Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 14:19 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 14:19
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
b14kumar
Joined: 17 Sep 2005
Last visit: 13 Jan 2013
Posts: 297
Own Kudos:
Posts: 297
Kudos: 424
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GMATT73
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Last visit: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 2,877
Own Kudos:
Posts: 2,877
Kudos: 1,256
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
shahnandan
Joined: 26 Sep 2005
Last visit: 11 Jan 2013
Posts: 239
Own Kudos:
Location: Munich,Germany
Posts: 239
Kudos: 86
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
OasisNYK
Joined: 07 Apr 2006
Last visit: 18 Jun 2009
Posts: 449
Own Kudos:
Products:
Posts: 449
Kudos: 15
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I had a tougher time with this one...it looks like it is between A and C for sure - and while C looks like it is the right answer, it does not say that pike is a specific predator of sun fish unless it is stating it is a predator of all fish - in which case it would be correct.

A on the other hand looks like it would reduce the number of fish in the population because while the water has become cleaner, it is still polluted a little and this causes there to be less offspring, thus reducing the population.

I chose A but I would not be overly confident that it is correct. OA?
User avatar
old_dream_1976
Joined: 09 Aug 2005
Last visit: 30 Nov 2006
Posts: 133
Own Kudos:
Posts: 133
Kudos: 17
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
OasisNYK
I had a tougher time with this one...it looks like it is between A and C for sure - and while C looks like it is the right answer, it does not say that pike is a specific predator of sun fish unless it is stating it is a predator of all fish - in which case it would be correct.

A on the other hand looks like it would reduce the number of fish in the population because while the water has become cleaner, it is still polluted a little and this causes there to be less offspring, thus reducing the population.

I chose A but I would not be overly confident that it is correct. OA?


here is my take on why not A

we are talking about a period 1 year max . My gold fish is with me for more than a year. and i bought him when he was about 2 inches long now he is 2 1/4 inc.

we are talking about decrease not decrease in growth.
User avatar
ps_dahiya
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Last visit: 15 Oct 2019
Posts: 1,486
Own Kudos:
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
Schools:Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
Posts: 1,486
Kudos: 1,215
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
OasisNYK
I had a tougher time with this one...it looks like it is between A and C for sure - and while C looks like it is the right answer, it does not say that pike is a specific predator of sun fish unless it is stating it is a predator of all fish - in which case it would be correct.

A on the other hand looks like it would reduce the number of fish in the population because while the water has become cleaner, it is still polluted a little and this causes there to be less offspring, thus reducing the population.

I chose A but I would not be overly confident that it is correct. OA?


C it is.

I also had a problem with these CRs but not now. I used to think cause of a cause. I mean thinking to far.
If you are inclined towards A then you might be thinking that more pollution ----> less offsprings ------> reduce population.
Less offsprings doesn't mean less population but it says less population growth.
User avatar
u2lover
Joined: 14 May 2006
Last visit: 08 Oct 2007
Posts: 706
Own Kudos:
Posts: 706
Kudos: 933
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
C... this was recently discussed
User avatar
mailtheguru
Joined: 31 May 2006
Last visit: 25 Mar 2007
Posts: 185
Own Kudos:
Location: Phoenix AZ
Posts: 185
Kudos: 89
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATT73
B is the trap answer for those who don`t understand the word benign (no effect).

The cleaner water creates a favorable enviornment for Pike to flourish. The pike`s prey are the sunfish, and hence their voracious eating habits have resulted in dwindling sunfish numbers. (C) clearly resolves the paradox.


Damn, i fell for it.
User avatar
Juaz
Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Last visit: 06 Oct 2008
Posts: 241
Own Kudos:
Posts: 241
Kudos: 307
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Between A and C, C is better choice.
User avatar
jaynayak
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Last visit: 07 Jul 2008
Posts: 894
Own Kudos:
Posts: 894
Kudos: 639
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Clear winner C

If the predator fish that feeds on the sunfish increase. It can account for the dwindling population of sunfish
User avatar
Gauss
Joined: 15 Nov 2005
Last visit: 10 Sep 2006
Posts: 100
Own Kudos:
Location: Italy
Posts: 100
Kudos: 433
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
in this case there is a close call between C and D but I would say D because it more directly address the new clining policy while C is more a consequence of the porcess
User avatar
dwivedys
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Last visit: 02 Sep 2018
Posts: 597
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 17
Concentration: Strategy
Schools:Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)
Posts: 597
Kudos: 750
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Did we get an OA on this C. I chose C as well.
User avatar
rnachloo
Joined: 12 Jul 2006
Last visit: 18 Dec 2006
Posts: 36
Own Kudos:
Location: Boston
Posts: 36
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
C

I see that we are discussing if A could be the answer? Doesn't A state the contrary. I think it says "if pollution is high, life span doesnt come down, by the number of offspring production during their life span comes down".

If this were true, the population of this particular fish should increase and not decrease?

Am I missing anything here.
User avatar
gmatornot
Joined: 14 Jul 2005
Last visit: 15 Apr 2007
Posts: 237
Own Kudos:
Posts: 237
Kudos: 361
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Got stuck between A & C but went with C finally (however note that it does not say that pike, the predator fish are actually in the lake)



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts