SINFULVEINS
I think you can eliminate B D E, for q3 but I really don't see how you can tell A and C apart. I marked A because it's given that creativity is supposed to create solutions which implies that the website should be easy to use and not only aesthetic, which makes what the author said debatable and hence creating an argument.
Idk why it's C but I guess the same "creativity is supposed to create solutions and not only look beautiful" thing applies for it as well. However, option C says that chaos theory does not have actual applications despite looking beautiful. Now, how is the reader supposed to know that chaos theory was not useful? The passage makes some statements about chaos theory and why do you expect the reader to argue over something they don't understand?
Unless anybody here has an actual explanation for C, if this passage and q come in any exam I would still mark A as it makes way more sense.
The author makes an assertion in the second paragraph about web design: "The goal of web design, for instance, is not to add to the functionality of an application but to make an application aesthetically pleasing and accessible to its users."
This statement implies that web design's purpose is purely aesthetic and accessibility-focused, not functional. A reader might naturally respond with option A: "Web pages should be visually appealing as well as easy to use." This represents a counterargument suggesting that web design should balance both visual appeal AND usability, challenging the author's either/or framing.
Reasoning: The author positions aesthetic appeal and accessibility as if they're separate from functionality, but a reader might argue that visual appeal and ease of use should go hand-in-hand with functionality rather than being the sole focus. The phrase "as well as" in option A suggests this complementary relationship rather than an exclusive one.
Options B and C relate to other examples (robotics and chaos theory) but don't directly counter specific assertions made by the author. Option D about ancient philosophers isn't addressed in the passage. Option E about monotonous work isn't implied as a concern the author raises.
The answer should be A. The passage's claim that web design aims purely for aesthetics and accessibility (rather than functionality) would naturally prompt a reader to argue that visual appeal should complement usability, not replace functional considerations.