Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Are you an Indian-IT-Male or an American working in Finance Industry? Join us in this live webinar with Scott Edinburgh, Wharton grad and Founder of Personal MBA Coach, to learn how to succeed despite coming from an overrepresented background.
Want to score 90 percentile or higher on GMAT CR? Attend this free webinar to learn how to pre-think assumptions and solve the most challenging questions in less than 2 minutes.
Want to solve 700+ level Algebra questions within 2 minutes? Attend this free webinar to learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Values questions in GMAT
What you'll gain: Strategies and techniques for approaching featured GMAT topics, an introduction to Manhattan Prep's world class GMAT instructors, and more.
Crises in international diplomacy do not always result from malice
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Oct 2009, 12:19
2
7
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
55% (hard)
Question Stats:
56% (01:20) correct 44% (01:35) wrong based on 354 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
Crises in international diplomacy do not always result from malice; for nations, like individuals, can find themselves locked into difficult positions, unable to back down.
(A) do not always result from malice; for nations, like individuals, can find
(B) do not always results from malice; nations, just as individuals, finding
(C) do not always results from malice; nations, such as individuals, can find
(D) aren’t always the results of malice; nations in the same way that individuals can find
(E) aren’t resulting always from malice; just like individuals who can find
Re: Crises in international diplomacy do not always result from malice
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Oct 2009, 15:41
2
a) correct subject verb agreement. Correct use of “like” b) Incorrect Subject Verb agreement – “results” is wrong. “Just as” can be replaced with “like” so it is unnecessarily wordy. c) Incorrect Subject Verb agreement – “results” is wrong. “Such as” is incorrect, as it is using individuals to provide an example of a nation, where as the original intention is to draw similarity. d) Incorrect Subject Verb agreement – “results” is wrong. “In the same way that individuals” can be replaced by “like”. e) Awkward sentence. The 2nd half of sentence is a fragment.
Re: Crises in international diplomacy do not always result from malice
[#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Nov 2009, 17:54
2
sagarsabnis wrote:
229. Crises in international diplomacy do not always result from malice; for nations, like individuals, can find themselves locked into difficult positions, unable to back down.
The semi colon separates two individual but related sentences. The purpose of the second sentence is to add more information to what the first sentence is explaining.
The second sentence basically says "Nations can find themselves lock into difficult positions". From my understanding this is how I brokedown the second sentence: "For" - basically means Because. Semicolons are often followed by words such as 'however', 'therefore' and 'for'. "Nations" - Main subject "like individuals" - is basically drawing a comparison from one noun to another. It is comparing that Nations are similar to individuals in how they can find themselves lock into difficult positions. "Locked into difficult positions" - is what the subject is doing so its the verb component. "unable to back down" - I think this is a modifier for difficult positions but am not completely sure on this one.
Re: Crises in international diplomacy do not always result from malice
[#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Sep 2010, 13:00
sagarsabnis wrote:
229. Crises in international diplomacy do not always result from malice; for nations, like individuals, can find themselves locked into difficult positions, unable to back down. (A) do not always result from malice; for nations, like individuals, can find (B) do not always results from malice; nations, just as individuals, finding (C) do not always results from malice; nations, such as individuals, can find (D) aren’t always the results of malice; nations in the same way that individuals can find (E) aren’t resulting always from malice; just like individuals who can find
B-- do not always results is wrong . it should be result C-- same as B. such as is wrong. it should be like. D-- wordy and awkward E-- aren't resulting is wrong. we don't need any continuous tense
Crises in international diplomacy do not always
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 27 Oct 2013, 14:35
2
Hello Guys,
I get the question in the last practice test of Kaplan Verbal and weren't convinced by their answer. Could you guy help me?? Crises in international diplomacy do not always result from malice; for nations, like individuals, can find themselves locked into difficult positions, unable to back down.
A] do not always result from malice; for nations, like individuals, can find B] does not always result from malice; nations, just as individuals, finding C] do not always result of malice; nations, such as individuals, can find D] aren't always the results of malice; nations in the same way that individuals can find E] aren't resulting always from malice; just like nations and individuals who can find
I believe 'For' is not used in independent clause...Please help
Originally posted by dreambig1990 on 27 Oct 2013, 13:36.
Last edited by dentobizz on 27 Oct 2013, 14:35, edited 1 time in total.
WE: General Management (Non-Profit and Government)
Re: Help with Kaplan SC question with For clause
[#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Oct 2013, 14:25
3
dreambig1990 wrote:
Hello Guys, I get the question in the last practice test of Kaplan Verbal and weren't convinced by their answer. Could you guy help me?? Crises in international diplomacy do not always result from malice; for nations, like individuals, can find themselves locked into difficult positions, unable to back down. A, B, does not always result from malice; nations, just as individuals, finding C, do not always result of malice; nations, such as individuals, can find D, aren't always the results of malice; nations in the same way that individuals can find E, aren't resulting always from malice; just like nations and individuals who can find
The correct ans is A tho I believe For is not used in independent clause...Please help
Hi dreambig1990,Two things :[1] PLS. search before you post the question on the forum to avoid duplication; this particular question has been discussed 6 times! on Gmatclub alone. [2] Always the title of your post should be first few words of your question
Now coming to your question on the OA ambiguity : B, does not always result from malice; nations, just as individuals, finding-Crises is the plural of crisis it needs a plural verb and finding is a modifier, thus the sentence lacks a main verb C, do not always result of malice; nations, such as individuals, can find-such as implies for example,this makes the sentence nonsensical D, aren't always the results of malice; nations in the same way that individuals can find--'results' is incorrect it should have been 'result of malice' and use of that is incorrect too E, aren't resulting always from malice; just like nations and individuals who can find--no main verb in the first sentence
A is the best pick or the least horrible out of the other four. But A is wrong to use a coordinating conjunction (for) after the semicolon.Semicolon should join two complete sentences or independent clauses. So A is also incorrect. BTW this question is from 1000 series (as indicated by prev. posters in the forum) and 1000 SC ia a very unreliable source for practice. Do not waste your time over it.
Re: Crises in international diplomacy do not always
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Dec 2015, 13:25
1
1
A. ‘For’ is used in the sense of because or since as a subordinate conjunction. Therefore, it can follow the semi-colon. One can authentic info about the usage of ‘for’ in this link < http://www.thefreedictionary.com/for. The best among the lot. B; SV error C; Individuals are not examples of nations D: the part after the semi-colon is a fragment. E. The subordinate clause is a fragment
P.S: This topic is from the infamous 1000 series and not from Kaplan.
_________________
If you stumble into the SC pitfall and limp, spend two months with me one-to-one online and see yourself flying.+91 9884544509, <newnaren@gmail.com>
Re: Crises in international diplomacy do not always
[#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Apr 2016, 18:25
dreambig1990 wrote:
Crises in international diplomacy do not always result from malice; for nations, like individuals, can find themselves locked into difficult positions, unable to back down.
A] do not always result from malice; for nations, like individuals, can find
B] does not always result from malice; nations, just as individuals, finding - no verb C] do not always result of malice; nations, such as individuals, can find - result OF - no. nations such as individuals nononono!!! D] aren't always the results of malice; nations in the same way that individuals can find - result OF no! no verb for nations. E] aren't resulting always from malice; just like nations and individuals who can find - just like X and Y - but where is the verb?
A is the best..though I do not agree with the construction. we have a semicolon, so we can not use the conjunction for and still be correct. for=because. because is a word that introduces a subordinate clause..so clearly semicolon + for is not right...but it is the best from the given...
Re: Crises in international diplomacy do not always result from
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Nov 2019, 08:06
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!
Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).
Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
gmatclubot
Re: Crises in international diplomacy do not always result from
[#permalink]
26 Nov 2019, 08:06
10:30am ET (3:30pm GMT / 9pm IST) | GMAT Club Chat Room
Chelsea Hann, Admission Director of Cornell johnson, will interact with applicants and answer their questions about Cornell’s MBA program & applications.
close
56% (01:20) correct 
