Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
GMAT Inequalities is a high-frequency topic in GMAT Quant, but many students struggle because the concepts behave differently from standard algebra. Understanding the right rules, patterns, and edge cases can significantly improve both speed and accuracy.
In Episode 3 of our GMAT Ninja Critical Reasoning series, we tackle Discrepancy, Paradox, and Explain an Oddity questions. You know the feeling: the passage gives you two facts that seem completely contradictory....
Join the special YouTube live-stream for selecting the winners of GMAT Club MBA Scholarships sponsored by Juno live. Watch who gets these coveted MBA scholarships offered by GMAT Club and Juno.
When looking at an answer with a two path possible strategy, I look for a question that necessarily weakens, and strengthens or one that answers the authors conclusion, on a yes, it will weaken, and no, this strengthens the authors claim/conclusion? How do I determine the difference? By knowing the assumption, or correct assumption? I don't know if I'm on the right track with this?
In order to achieve correct answers, I must be able to determine the following from the argument 1)conclusion 2)premises 3)brain storm assumptions? Then find an answer with a 2 path possibility? Yes, weakens claim, and No, strengthens authors claim? I guess it's confusing, but is this correct?
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
When looking at an answer with a two path possible strategy, I look for a question that necessarily weakens, and strengthens or one that answers the authors conclusion, on a yes, it will weaken, and no, this strengthens the authors claim/conclusion? How do I determine the difference? By knowing the assumption, or correct assumption? I don't know if I'm on the right track with this?
In order to achieve correct answers, I must be able to determine the following from the argument 1)conclusion 2)premises 3)brain storm assumptions? Then find an answer with a 2 path possibility? Yes, weakens claim, and No, strengthens authors claim? I guess it's confusing, but is this correct?
Show more
here as a video by Ron that explains how to tackle such kind of question
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.