Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Join us in a live GMAT practice session and solve 30 challenging GMAT questions with other test takers in timed conditions, covering GMAT Quant, Data Sufficiency, Data Insights, Reading Comprehension, and Critical Reasoning questions.
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
Passage: Hypothesizing that lullabies, characterized by their slow tempos, are universally calming to infants, Constance M. Bainbridge and colleagues played a lullaby sung in the Scottish Gaelic language and a non-lullaby sung in the Seri language to a group of infants. The team found that the infants' heart rates decreased more during the lullaby than during the non-lullaby. Since a decrease in heart rate is associated with relaxation, the team concluded that the lullaby relaxed the infants. Noting that reduced heart rate can also be associated with increased attention, one critic argues that instead, the lullaby simply attracted the infants' attention. Bainbridge and colleagues also measured pupil size, as pupils typically become larger when a stimulus captures a person's attention. Question: Which finding, if true, would most directly weaken the critic's claim? Answer Choices: A. Blinking, which indicates attention, was equally frequent whether infants were listening to the song in Scottish Gaelic or song in Seri. B. Neither the Scottish Gaelic language nor the melody of the traditional Scots lullaby was familiar to infants in the study. C. The infants' pupils were smaller when the infants were listening to lullabies than when they were listening to non-lullabies. D. Parents of infants in the study chose the lullaby over the non-lullaby when asked which song they would use to calm their child.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Passage: Hypothesizing that lullabies, characterized by their slow tempos, are universally calming to infants, Constance M. Bainbridge and colleagues played a lullaby sung in the Scottish Gaelic language and a non-lullaby sung in the Seri language to a group of infants. The team found that the infants' heart rates decreased more during the lullaby than during the non-lullaby. Since a decrease in heart rate is associated with relaxation, the team concluded that the lullaby relaxed the infants. Noting that reduced heart rate can also be associated with increased attention, one critic argues that instead, the lullaby simply attracted the infants' attention. Bainbridge and colleagues also measured pupil size, as pupils typically become larger when a stimulus captures a person's attention. Question: Which finding, if true, would most directly weaken the critic's claim? Answer Choices: A. Blinking, which indicates attention, was equally frequent whether infants were listening to the song in Scottish Gaelic or song in Seri. B. Neither the Scottish Gaelic language nor the melody of the traditional Scots lullaby was familiar to infants in the study. C. The infants' pupils were smaller when the infants were listening to lullabies than when they were listening to non-lullabies. D. Parents of infants in the study chose the lullaby over the non-lullaby when asked which song they would use to calm their child.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Show more
This is not a GMAT question. The question is archived.