Does it say in the original problem that z is an Int? That would seem to make a difference here. Here is how I would attack it assuming z is Int. I think you would need logic, more than algebra for this problem which seems to be testing your knowledge of number properties.
Restating the problem we see that it is asking, is Z positive?
Statement 1. The form z-1, z, z+1 should be recognize able as the sequence of three numbers. [this is what makes me think the problem may have specified z is Int]
Three numbers when multiplied will be negative if all three are negative, or only one is.
Because this is a sequence. The only option where one number is positive would mean z=0. {-1, 0, 1}
(-1)(0)(-1) cannot be less than 0, as statement one requires, thus the only possibility is that all three numbers are less than 0. So...
Z+1<0
z<0
z-1<0
Statement 1 seems to be telling us, z cannot be 0, and z cannot be -1, and z is negative
Therefore sufficient, we can say for certain z is not greater than 0
Statement 2 seems a bit easier. The only integer for which |z| < 1 is true is 0.
Thus, if z = 0 then sufficient. And the answer is D.
It looks like in your algebra for statement 1, what you didn't consider was that none of the terms can equal 0 because that would make a false statement. 0 multiplied by anything is 0, and 0 cannot be <0
Your algebra in statement two, I think you forgot to bound the set.
|z| < 1
Breaks down into...
z < 1
z > -1
The set of answers for this inequality are only numbers between and not including 1 and -1. If we are dealing with Ints, then the only option is 0 and we have sufficiency
Sent from my iPhone using
GMAT Club Forum mobile app