Last visit was: 20 Nov 2025, 01:25 It is currently 20 Nov 2025, 01:25
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
HarveyS
Joined: 14 Jan 2013
Last visit: 25 Apr 2017
Posts: 112
Own Kudos:
1,704
 [37]
Given Kudos: 30
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
GMAT Date: 08-01-2013
GPA: 3.7
WE:Consulting (Consulting)
Posts: 112
Kudos: 1,704
 [37]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
32
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
77,001
 [11]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 77,001
 [11]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
dav90
Joined: 13 Nov 2014
Last visit: 07 Feb 2016
Posts: 34
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105
GMAT 1: 590 Q42 V29
GMAT 2: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 630 Q47 V29
Posts: 34
Kudos: 18
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
77,001
 [2]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 77,001
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
dav90
VeritasPrepKarishma
Mountain14
Did Jeff record more sales revenue this month than Dan did?

(1) Jeff earned 20% more in sales commission this month than Dan did.

(2) Dan earns 6% commission on his sales, and Jeff earns 8% commission on his.


Based on revenue, salespeople earn commission. We need to know whether Jeff recorded more revenue than Dan.

(1) Jeff earned 20% more in sales commission this month than Dan did.
Jeff's more commission doesn't imply more revenue, Their rate of commission could be different (as given in stmnt 2) due to their different profile, the products they sell could offer varying commissions etc

(2) Dan earns 6% commission on his sales, and Jeff earns 8% commission on his.
This alone is not sufficient since we don't know who got more commission in absolute terms.

Using both, we know that Dan earns 6% and Jeff earns 8%. This means for every $100 of revenue, Dan gets $6 and Jeff gets $8 so Jeff gets (2/6)*100 = 33.33% more than Dan for same revenue.
Had their revenue been same, Jeff would have earned 33.33% more than Dan in commission. Since Jeff earned only 20% more in commission, his revenue must have been less than that of Dan. Both statements together are sufficient.

Answer (C)


I am not able to understand the reasoning, Why are we assuming that both of them are getting percentage on same amount,
It's commission so one's sale could be 10000$ while other's sale could be 10$ so how can the percentage give me the correct answer?

We are not assuming that their revenue is the same. What we are saying is that if the revenue were the same, Jeff would have earned 33.33% more than Dan in commission. If Jeff's revenue were higher than Dan's, then Jeff would have earned more than 33.33% more than Dan, say 40% more commission than Dan or 50% more than Dan etc.
If Jeff's revenue were lower than Dan's, then Jeff would have earned less than 33.33% more than Dan, that is Jeff would have earned 30% more commission than Dan, or 20% more commission than Dan etc.

Try some numbers to understand this better.

Since we are given that Jeff's commission is only 20% more than Dan's commission, it means Jeff's revenue must be lower than Dan's revenue.
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
77,001
 [1]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 77,001
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VeritasPrepKarishma
Mountain14
Did Jeff record more sales revenue this month than Dan did?

(1) Jeff earned 20% more in sales commission this month than Dan did.

(2) Dan earns 6% commission on his sales, and Jeff earns 8% commission on his.


Based on revenue, salespeople earn commission. We need to know whether Jeff recorded more revenue than Dan.

(1) Jeff earned 20% more in sales commission this month than Dan did.
Jeff's more commission doesn't imply more revenue, Their rate of commission could be different (as given in stmnt 2) due to their different profile, the products they sell could offer varying commissions etc

(2) Dan earns 6% commission on his sales, and Jeff earns 8% commission on his.
This alone is not sufficient since we don't know who got more commission in absolute terms.

Using both, we know that Dan earns 6% and Jeff earns 8%. This means for every $100 of revenue, Dan gets $6 and Jeff gets $8 so Jeff gets (2/6)*100 = 33.33% more than Dan for same revenue.
Had their revenue been same, Jeff would have earned 33.33% more than Dan in commission. Since Jeff earned only 20% more in commission, his revenue must have been less than that of Dan. Both statements together are sufficient.

Answer (C)

Responding to a pm:

Quote:

Could u please tell me that how u got this:
(2/6)*100 = 33.33% more

On $100, Dan earns $6 and Jeff earns $8. So for every $100, Jeff earns $2 more than Dan.

So for every $100, Jeff earns (2/6)*100 = 33.33% more than Dan.
2 is Jeff's extra earning and 6 is Dan's earning.
avatar
ajdse22
Joined: 17 Aug 2015
Last visit: 30 Nov 2019
Posts: 76
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 196
Posts: 76
Kudos: 86
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
statement #1 -- says Jeff's sales comission is more than Dan's. But it is possible that this could be due to comission rate. Even if Dan's sales commission is higher he could still make less comission. Another case is when their sales comission rate is same in that case Jeff's sales will have to be higher. NS

statement #2 -- sales commission rate of Dan is higher. But we dont know what is Dan's total comission relative to Jeff's.

combining the statements. If Dan's commission rate is higher but he still makes less total commission, this implies his sales has to be lower to make this happen.
I have solved it via intuition and reasoning, but we can apply algebra inequality as well

Sj - sales of Jeff
Sd- sales of Dan
Rj - Jeff's commission rate
Rd- Dan's commission rate

combine statements
statement #1 --Sj*Rj> Sd*Rd --cross multiply ..since we know everything is positive so
Sj/Sd> Rd/Rj.
statement #2--.now since Rd > Rj this implies Sj/Sd >1 => Sj>Sd--sufficient
Note that
If instead it was given that commission rate of Dan is less than commission rate of Jeff, that would still have been insufficient and answer would have been E. Why?
Rd<Rj=> Rd/Rj <1. If Sj/Sd> Rd/Rj -- this does not imply Sj/Sd is either greater or less than or equal to 1. Anything can happen.
avatar
manishtank1988
Joined: 14 Oct 2012
Last visit: 31 Oct 2019
Posts: 114
Own Kudos:
282
 [2]
Given Kudos: 1,023
Products:
Posts: 114
Kudos: 282
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
My 2 cents:
NOTE: Commission = (x%)*Revenues;
Sales Commission = (x%)*(Sales Revenues). Therefore, C = (x%)*R
Question: Jr > Dr?
1) Jc = 1.2*Dc
2) Jc = 0.08*Jr & Dc = 0.06Dr
1+2) Jc = 1.2*Dc
=> 0.08*Jr = 1.2*0.06*Dr
=> 8*Jr = 1.2*6*Dr
=> Jr = (7.2/8)*Dr | 72/80 = 9/10 = 0.9
=> Jr = 0.9*Dr
=> Jr < Dr | Answer C
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,593
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,593
Kudos: 1,079
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
Math Expert
105408 posts
496 posts