amlan1985
Hi
mikemcgarry,
Thanks for the reply. But my question had arisen after working on several inference/conclusion questions. I noticed that
- In an Inference question, the correct answer is often a rephrase of the question stem or a contrapositive of the question stem but in a conclusion question contrapositive or rephrase is not the correct answer choice. In conclusion question type the correct ans seems to be always a deduction or prediction---- for example
If a Q says - If A and B then C. But If A then not B and if B then not A.
Inference ans choice - If not C, then neither A nor B.
Conclusion ans choice - C is not possible.
I have noticed this change of approach in selecting correct ans choice in many Inference / Conclusion questions.
Kindly let me know your view.
Regards
Amlan Mishra
Dear
amlan1985,
My friend, I think you may be thinking too much in terms of formal logic. While the LSAT cares about formal logic, the GMAT is much more practical: it cares about the push & pull of the real world. I think there's a real danger about getting too formal in your approach to the GMAT CR. If you have a "one size fits all" approach to categories of CR questions, you inevitably will meet some that simply don't fit the pattern. Instead, you have to be tuned in to where the rubber meets the road in the real world. See:
GMAT Critical Reasoning and Outside KnowledgeReading the business news every day will help you much more on GMAT CR than studying formal logic.
Does all this make sense?
Mike