nandini14
I did understand why other options dont make sense but what is it about A directly stating because "inevitably" does not seem right to me either
nandini14 Understanding Cicero's Logical Chain:Cicero's argument flows like this:
\(1.\) Emotions come from evaluations of goodness/badness
\(2.\) A wise person can NEVER achieve complete emotionlessness
\(3.\) Therefore: A wise person must always be making some evaluations
Why "Inevitably" Is Necessary:Think about what would happen if we weakened the word "inevitably":
- If wise people
sometimes evaluate → They could have emotion-free periods
- If wise people
often evaluate → Still leaves room for emotionlessness
- If wise people
inevitably evaluate → They can NEVER be emotion-free
Since Cicero concludes that complete emotionlessness is
impossible for wise people, he must assume they
inevitably (always, unavoidably) make evaluations.
What Went Wrong in Your Thinking:You're experiencing what I call "strong language resistance" - a common GMAT trap where test-takers shy away from absolute-sounding words. But remember: assumptions need to be strong enough to guarantee the conclusion. Weak assumptions create logical gaps.
Pattern Recognition:This belongs to the "Required Assumption" family. Look for trigger words like "never," "always," "impossible" in the conclusion - they signal you'll need equally strong language in the correct assumption.