The correct answer here is
Option E in my opinion.
The question focuses the Weakening Type. Let's dive into the options!
A) A glaucoma patient suffers no side effects from using cannabis.This is about patient effects, not the legal consequences for doctors. ❌
Does not weaken(B) For doctors, ethics weigh below the American Medical Association’s (AMA) mandates.If doctors follow AMA rules over ethics, they won’t recommend cannabis, which would actually
support the idea that they avoid arrest. ❌
Does not clearly weaken.
(C) Lawyers, with professional discretion, can withhold information if the information is damaging to clients.This is irrelevant. It’s about lawyers, not doctors or the situation at hand. ❌
Does not weaken the conclusion.
(D) Many patients have been arrested for following the advice of doctors.This supports the seriousness of the law, which
strengthens the idea that doctors might be arrested too. ❌
Strengthens, not weakens.
(E) Some drugs now commonly used, such as Novocain, were once illegal to use.This shows that
drugs currently illegal may eventually be accepted, which suggests
doctors might not face punishment forever, or that the situation might change in the future, making the idea of arrest not evitable.
✅
Weakens the conclusion.
siddhantvarma
Doctors face an ethical dilemma with glaucoma patients over the choice between prescribing a legal drug with harmful side effects or recommending the illegal drug cannabis, which works better despite the hallucinations it causes. The American Medical Association (AMA) has posted an official warning to medical practitioners that advising patients to use an illicit drug is forbidden under federal law, and punishment can include prison sentences. While no doctor has been arrested yet, it is inevitable that doctors cannot avoid arrest for long.
Which of the following, if true, would undermine the conclusion derived in the argument
(A) A glaucoma patient suffers no side effects from using cannabis.
(B) For doctors, ethics weigh below the American Medical Association’s (AMA) mandates.
(C) Lawyers, with professional discretion, can withhold information if the information is damaging to clients.
(D) Many patients have been arrested for following the advice of doctors.
(E) Some drugs now commonly used, such as Novocain, were once illegal to use.