Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
we say that whenever a particple phrase is not closet to the pronoun or noun its modifying , its then a misplaced-modifier. but sometimes, we agree even if the modifying part comes in the end of the sentence like -
For members of the Ashanthi nation in Africa, animal-hide shields with wooden frames were essential items of miltary equipment, a method to protect warriors against enemy arrows and spears.
1-
2- as a mthod protecting
3 - protecting
4 - as a protection of
5 - to protect
I was able to rule out 1,2 and 4. But when it came between 3 and 5 , i thought that 3 is incoorect because this participle phrase should have come immediately after animal-hide shields like -
For members of the Ashanthi nation in Africa, animal-hide shields with wooden-frames , protecting warriors against enemy arrows and spears, were essential items of miltary equipment.
Somehow as per the original sentence, i felt that the protecting phrase was modifying the military equipment and hence didn't chose it.
Also, i remember in some question that choice was eliminated because the phrase came in the end and it was supposed to modify a noun in the begining of the sentence. i am trying to locate that sentence.
So what are the rules that govern the acceptance of modifier in the begining of the sentence and end of the sentence when its supposed to modify the noun in the begining of the sentence.
i am not sure if i have expressed myself clearly .
any help please.[/u]
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
You would generally use a relative pronoun ( that, which) if you wanted to modify "military..". also, just a little more, a pronoun modifies a noun. here "protecting" is not a pronoun for military.
Correct me if i am wrong, but I believe that "protecting......" is an absolute phrase, which gives us more info about the shields.
Search for an explanation by ob. ob explained it really well.
hope this helps. i
Praetorian
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.