Last visit was: 17 Jul 2025, 05:44 It is currently 17 Jul 2025, 05:44
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
nverma
Joined: 24 Jul 2009
Last visit: 13 Jun 2011
Posts: 155
Own Kudos:
526
 [2]
Posts: 155
Kudos: 526
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
angel2009
Joined: 25 Jul 2009
Last visit: 17 Jan 2011
Posts: 146
Own Kudos:
Posts: 146
Kudos: 778
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
shaselai
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 12 Jun 2009
Last visit: 17 Jun 2019
Posts: 1,675
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 52
Status:What's your raashee?
Location: United States (NC)
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Schools: UNC (Kenan-Flagler) - Class of 2013
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
WE:Programming (Computer Software)
Products:
Schools: UNC (Kenan-Flagler) - Class of 2013
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
Posts: 1,675
Kudos: 435
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
einstein10
Joined: 13 Dec 2009
Last visit: 10 Jul 2012
Posts: 77
Own Kudos:
611
 [1]
Given Kudos: 10
Posts: 77
Kudos: 611
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
nverma
Dr. Libokov: Certain islands near New Zealand are home to the tuatara, reptiles that are the sole surviving members of the sphenodontidans. Sphenodontidans were plentiful throughout the world during the age of the dinosaurs. But the survival of sphenodontidans near New Zealand, and their total disappearance elsewhere, is no mystery. New Zealand and nearby islands have no native land mammals. Land mammals, plentiful elsewhere, undoubtedly became major predators of sphenodontidans and their eggs, leading to their extinction.
Dr. Santos: In fact, the tuatara thrive only on a few islands near New Zealand. On all those where land mammals, such as rats, dogs, or cats, have been introduced in recent years, the tuatara are now extinct or nearly so.
Which one of the following most accurately characterizes Dr. Santos’ response to the hypothesis advanced by Dr. Libokov?
(A) It identifies a flaw in Dr. Libokov’s reasoning.
(B) It restates Dr. Libokov’s major hypothesis and thus adds nothing to it.
(C) It contradicts one of Dr. Libokov’s assertions.
(D) It offers a hypothesis that is incompatible with Dr. Libokov’s position.
(E) It provides additional evidence in support of Dr. Libokov’s hypothesis.

Santos response does not identifies any flaw in Libokov’s reasoning or any other thing as mentioned in other options, instead Santos response giving more evidence to support the Libokov’s reasoning. Santos whole response is directed towards support of Libokov’s reasoning .. IMO E

what is the OA ?
User avatar
amp0201
Joined: 24 Dec 2009
Last visit: 14 Aug 2013
Posts: 115
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 115
Kudos: 130
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A) It identifies a flaw in Dr. Libokov’s reasoning.
-- Definitely doesn't identify a flaw. Hence not a correct answer choice.

(B) It restates Dr. Libokov’s major hypothesis and thus adds nothing to it.
-- It though restates Dr. Lobokov's hypothesis, it provides evidences to support what Dr. Libokov's has said. Hence cannot be correct answer choice.

(C) It contradicts one of Dr. Libokov’s assertions.
-- It is not at all contradicting with Dr. Libokov's assertions. Hence cannot be correct answer choice.

(D) It offers a hypothesis that is incompatible with Dr. Libokov’s position.
-- Both the hypothesis are stating same thing hence compatible to each other. Hence D cannot be a correct answer choice.

(E) It provides additional evidence in support of Dr. Libokov’s hypothesis.
-- This is correct answer choice. Since Dr. Santos is providing additional evidences of island where the land mammals exist, the reptiles have disappeared.

Please provide with OA. Thank You.

Thanks,
Akhil M.Parekh
User avatar
whiplash2411
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Last visit: 02 Mar 2015
Posts: 1,761
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 210
Status:Three Down.
Concentration: General Management, Nonprofit
Posts: 1,761
Kudos: 3,555
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I would go with E as well since the statement strengthens the original hypothesis by providing information of experimental evidence (i.e. introduction of the mammalian species like rats etc lead to near extinction)

What's the OA?
User avatar
Testluv
User avatar
Kaplan GMAT Instructor
Joined: 21 Jun 2010
Last visit: 10 Dec 2010
Posts: 55
Own Kudos:
485
 [2]
Given Kudos: 2
Location: Toronto
Posts: 55
Kudos: 485
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi,

let's consider the two choices under discussion. Let's start with choice B. It reads:
Quote:
It restates Dr. Libokov’s major hypothesis and thus adds nothing to it

What is Dr. Libokov's major hypothesis, and where does it appear in his remarks?

Dr. Libokov's major hypothesis is his last sentence:
Quote:
Land mammals, plentiful elsewhere, undoubtedly became major predators of sphenodontidans and their eggs, leading to their extinction.

Does Dr. Santos simply RESTATE this hypothesis?

Well, given that "restate" means "state again", the answer is clearly "NO". (Thus, choice B is incorrect).

How, then, does Dr. Santos' response relate to Dr. Libokov's major hypothesis?

Santos' response supports Libokov's hypothesis; if we were to remove Santos' response, then Libokov's hypothesis would have less support (denial test).

Thus, Santos' response provides additional support for Libokov's major hypothesis, and choice E is correct.
User avatar
Rikhraj1
Joined: 27 Jan 2024
Last visit: 15 May 2025
Posts: 33
Given Kudos: 210
Posts: 33
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel KarishmaB pls help me how this was an evaluate question?
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 17 Jul 2025
Posts: 16,111
Own Kudos:
74,364
 [2]
Given Kudos: 475
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,111
Kudos: 74,364
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
nverma
Dr. Libokov: Certain islands near New Zealand are home to the tuatara, reptiles that are the sole surviving members of the sphenodontidans. Sphenodontidans were plentiful throughout the world during the age of the dinosaurs. But the survival of sphenodontidans near New Zealand, and their total disappearance elsewhere, is no mystery. New Zealand and nearby islands have no native land mammals. Land mammals, plentiful elsewhere, undoubtedly became major predators of sphenodontidans and their eggs, leading to their extinction.

Dr. Santos: In fact, the tuatara thrive only on a few islands near New Zealand. On all those where land mammals, such as rats, dogs, or cats, have been introduced in recent years, the tuatara are now extinct or nearly so.

Which one of the following most accurately characterizes Dr. Santos’ response to the hypothesis advanced by Dr. Libokov?


(A) It identifies a flaw in Dr. Libokov’s reasoning.

(B) It restates Dr. Libokov’s major hypothesis and thus adds nothing to it.

(C) It contradicts one of Dr. Libokov’s assertions.

(D) It offers a hypothesis that is incompatible with Dr. Libokov’s position.

(E) It provides additional evidence in support of Dr. Libokov’s hypothesis.


This is a method of reasoning question.
Discussion on Method Questions: https://youtu.be/uA5aXAZI1Z8


Dr. Libokov:
Certain islands near New Zealand are home to T, sole surviving members of the S.
S were plentiful throughout the world during the age of the dinosaurs.
Now S survive only near New Zealand.
New Zealand and nearby islands have no native land mammals.
Hypothesis (Conclusion): Land mammals, plentiful elsewhere, became major predators of S and that is why S survive only near New Zealand.


Dr. Santos:
In fact, the T thrive only on a few islands near New Zealand.
On all those where land mammals, such as rats, dogs, or cats, have been introduced in recent years, the T are now extinct or nearly so.

Santos adds further evidence to Libokov's argument. Libokov insists that land mammals are responsible for extinction of S from everywhere else. Santos says that yes, even in New Zealand, on those islands where land mammals were introduced, T disappeared. Hence Santos supports Libokov's hypothesis with additional evidence.

(E) It provides additional evidence in support of Dr. Libokov’s hypothesis.

Answer (E)
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7359 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts