GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 05 Dec 2019, 23:36

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the body can

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 20 Jun 2005
Posts: 97
Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the body can  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 25 Nov 2019, 10:34
4
17
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

80% (01:05) correct 20% (01:28) wrong based on 821 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the body can constantly change its genes to fashion a seeming unlimited number of antibodies. each specifically targeted at an invading microbe or foreign substance.

(A) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, each specifically targeted at

(B) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, each targeted specifically to

(C) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, all specifically targeted at

(D) seemingly unlimited number of antibodies, all of them targeted specifically to

(E) seemingly unlimited number of antibodies, each targeted specifically at

https://www.nytimes.com/1987/10/13/science/mit-scientist-wins-nobel-prize-for-medicine.html

Dr. Tonegawa was cited by the Nobel committee at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm for discovering how the body can constantly change its genes to fashion a seemingly unlimited number of antibodies, each specifically targeted at an invading microbe or foreign substance.

Originally posted by pi10t on 06 Sep 2007, 14:48.
Last edited by Bunuel on 25 Nov 2019, 10:34, edited 4 times in total.
Edited the question.
Most Helpful Community Reply
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 640
Re: Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the body can  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Sep 2007, 22:48
8
1
pi10t wrote:
Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the body can constantly change its genes to fashion a seeming unlimited number of antibodies. each specifically targeted at an invading microbe or foreign
substance.

(A) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, each specifically targeted at
(B) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, each targeted specifically to
(C) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, all specifically targeted at
(D) seemingly unlimited number of antibodies, all of them targeted specifically to
(E) seemingly unlimited number of antibodies, each targeted specifically at


E is correct. adjectives only modify nouns while adverbs can modify verbs, phrases, and other adverbs.

in this case, seemingly (an adverb) is modifying "unlimited number of antibodies"

"seeming" is an adjective and therefore wrong so we can eliminate A, B, and C. between D and E, "targeted.. at" is preferred over "targeted.. to"
General Discussion
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 26 Nov 2008
Posts: 40
Re: Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the body can  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Dec 2008, 17:48
4
lgon wrote:
255. Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the body can constantly change its genes to fashion a seeming unlimited number of antibodies, each specifically targeted at an invading microbe or foreign substance.
(A) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, each specifically targeted at
(B) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, each targeted specifically to
(C) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, all specifically targeted at
(D) seemingly unlimited number of antibodies, all of them targeted specifically to
(E) seemingly unlimited number of antibodies, each targeted specifically at
Why A is wrong?



2 clues

1. "seemingly" must qualify an adj Eliminate A, ¨B and C
2. "Targeted at" is idiomatic
3. Each is required to illustrate the importance of each and every single antibody

Choose E
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 May 2011
Posts: 149
Concentration: Finance, Real Estate
GMAT Date: 12-27-2011
WE: Law (Law)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the body can  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Aug 2011, 11:34
1
Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the body can constantly change its genes to fashion a seeming unlimited number of antibodies. each specifically targeted at an invading microbe or foreign
substance.

(A) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, each specifically targeted at SEEMINGLY SHOULD APPLY TO DESCRIBE THE ADVERB. A, B, C ARE GONE
(B) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, each targeted specifically to
(C) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, all specifically targeted at
(D) seemingly unlimited number of antibodies, all of them targeted specifically to-TARGETED AT IS THE CORRECT IDIOM
(E) seemingly unlimited number of antibodies, each targeted specifically at
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Sep 2011
Posts: 130
Re: Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the body can  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Mar 2012, 15:36
I have chosen E for the answer:

A. Seemingly is the correct word here because we are trying to use a word to modify unlimited. Since an adjective cannot modify another adjective, an adverb must be used.

B. Seemingly is the correct word to be used, not seeming. "Targeted specifically at" is the correct form.

C. Seemingly is the correct word to be used, not seeming. The word "all" does not make sense in this case because it does not agree with the singular "an invading microbe or foreign substance."

D. The word "all" does not make sense in this case because it doesn't agree with "an invading microbe or foreign substance." Also, "targeted specifically to" is the incorrect form.

E. Seemingly is used correctly here and "each targeted specifically at" makes sense.
VP
VP
User avatar
Status: Far, far away!
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Posts: 1010
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the body can  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Jul 2013, 05:27
skamal7 wrote:
Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the body can constantly change its genes to fashion a seeming unlimited number of antibodies, each specifically targeted at an invading microbe or foreign substance.
(A) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, each specifically targeted at
(B) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, each targeted specifically to
(C) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, all specifically targeted at
(D) seemingly unlimited number of antibodies, all of them targeted specifically to
(E) seemingly unlimited number of antibodies, each targeted specifically at

I always get wrong when there is a construction like [adverb/adjective] [adverb/adjective] [noun]

Please some one help me to identify correctly in these type of constructions.
As per the meaning of sentence how the body can constantly change its genes to a antibodies . So it should be a adjective to modify the antibodies .Asusual i ended up wrongly with these constructions


This is form the OG's solution:
"Choices A, B, and C incorrectly use the adjective form seeming to modify the participial adjective unlimited. "
This means that "seeming (adj)unlimited (adj)number of antibodies" two adjectives cannot modify each other.
With this you are left with D and E only. I personally cannot find any difference between "targeted specifically" and "specifically targeted".
D is wrong because uses a wrong idiom "targeted TO"

Adjectives modify nouns.
Adverbs modify verbs, a clause, an adjective or an another adverb.
VP
VP
User avatar
Status: Far, far away!
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Posts: 1010
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the body can  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Jul 2013, 05:49
3
skamal7 wrote:
Carbon-14 dating reveals that the megalithic monuments in Brittany are nearly 2,000 years as old as any of their supposed Mediterranean predecessors.
(A) as old as any of their supposed
(B) older than any of their supposed
(C) as old as their supposed
(D) older than any of their supposedly
(E) as old as their supposedly
Here adjective is used. and can you tell me hw to identify whether it is modifying the adjective attached to it or the noun? here it modfies the noun but in the previous question it modifies the adjective.Am nt able to figure that out which one is being modified

B is answer here


Once you eliminate A C E (because they use "2000 years as old as"), you have to choose between supposed and supposedly

(B) older than any of their supposed (adjective) Mediterranean predecessors.
(D) older than any of their supposedly (adverb)Mediterranean predecessors.

What can "supposedly" modify? ONLY "Mediterranean ": it's a adverb so cannot refer to a noun.
So D says supposedly Mediterranean

What can "supposed" modify? ONLY "predecessors": it's a adjective so MUST refer to a noun.
So D says supposed predecessors

What is the intended meaning ? The sentence tries to say that those monuments are older than the supposed predecessors, so B is correct.

"Here adjective is used. and can you tell me hw to identify whether it is modifying the adjective attached to it or the noun? "
It's an adj, so it MUST refer to the noun. In the above question the adjective refereed to another adjective, and that's why it was wrong.
In the previous question
seeming/seemingly===> unlimited number of antibodies
we had to choose how to modify "unlimited " (an adj), so an adverb was required.

Hope everything is clear
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 01 Apr 2017
Posts: 25
Re: Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the body can  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Apr 2017, 08:58
Hello Guys,

Shall somebody explain me why ''target at'' and not ''target to''?

Does not ''Each'' or ''All of them''need an explicit subject?, Would it be better ''That''?

Regards,


Kind regards,

Manuel
Director
Director
User avatar
P
Joined: 09 Aug 2017
Posts: 604
Re: Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the body can  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Oct 2019, 17:43
Can I just say that when we are using verb related to aim, mark, fix, point, target etc. it is idiomatically correct to use "at"?
Look, when we are hitting at particular point or raising finger at specific person, we use "at". "At" normally talks about something specific.
What are your views over this?

beckee529 wrote:
pi10t wrote:
Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the body can constantly change its genes to fashion a seeming unlimited number of antibodies. each specifically targeted at an invading microbe or foreign
substance.

(A) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, each specifically targeted at
(B) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, each targeted specifically to
(C) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, all specifically targeted at
(D) seemingly unlimited number of antibodies, all of them targeted specifically to
(E) seemingly unlimited number of antibodies, each targeted specifically at


E is correct. adjectives only modify nouns while adverbs can modify verbs, phrases, and other adverbs.

in this case, seemingly (an adverb) is modifying "unlimited number of antibodies"

"seeming" is an adjective and therefore wrong so we can eliminate A, B, and C. between D and E, "targeted.. at" is preferred over "targeted.. to"
Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 7154
Re: Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Nov 2019, 10:34
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the   [#permalink] 25 Nov 2019, 10:34
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the body can

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne