I think +ve angle is defined anti-clockwise from X-axis. Not clock-wise.
Then only you get the answer "slope of the line = sqrt 3 unambiguously!".
Just to assure yourself, look at the number of quadrants(I,II,III,IV) in xy plane of co-ordinate geometry. Do let me know if I am wrong.
Ian does have a point here. If (1) is saying No and (2) is saying yes, as per the definition of D, we can say D is the answer. However, it also answers E where statements (1) & (2) together are NOT sufficient. Thus, both D & E are correct. That is why such questions donot appear in GMAT.
This fundamentally boils down to the fact, if you get 'yes' for (1) (i.e., individually sufficient), then you get 'yes' for (2) also (i.e., individually sufficient) to enable you to go for the answer D.
Alternately, if you get 'no' for (1) (i.e., individually sufficient), then you get 'no' for (2) also (i.e., individually sufficient) to enable you to go for the answer D.
But, never do you get 'yes'(or 'no') for (1) and 'no'(or 'yes') for (2) to enable you to go for the answer D in GMAT. Take my bet for it. 100$ is tough for me as I am from India. But, 100 rupees is definitely what I can afford
boksana
60 is always clockwise from x. So it's cannot be two scenario.
My explanations:
y=xsrt3-5sqrt3, => (0,-5sqrt3), (5,0) => distances are not equal! so
From 1) we can definitely say NO, therefore 1 is sufficient
slope of the line = sqrt 3 unambiguously! From 2 slope =tan 60=sqrt 3
WE can definitely say YES. 2 is sufficient
THUS, each is sufficient. D.