Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 06:11 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 06:11
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
saurya_s
Joined: 08 Jul 2004
Last visit: 14 Aug 2006
Posts: 319
Own Kudos:
Posts: 319
Kudos: 2,375
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
bigtooth81
Joined: 05 May 2004
Last visit: 04 Aug 2011
Posts: 141
Own Kudos:
Affiliations: CFA Level 2
Location: Hanoi
GPA: 3.6
Posts: 141
Kudos: 1,039
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ian7777
Joined: 09 Mar 2003
Last visit: 24 Jan 2010
Posts: 227
Own Kudos:
Posts: 227
Kudos: 178
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
saurya_s
Joined: 08 Jul 2004
Last visit: 14 Aug 2006
Posts: 319
Own Kudos:
Posts: 319
Kudos: 2,375
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Ian
This is courtsey of bluetooth
The problem here is that normally we take E when (1)+(2) --> NO UNIQUE RESULT but in this case, we take E when (1)+(2) --> UNREASONABLE.
So E is the right anwer, as you got.
User avatar
ian7777
Joined: 09 Mar 2003
Last visit: 24 Jan 2010
Posts: 227
Own Kudos:
Posts: 227
Kudos: 178
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
where is this question from?

unreasonable isn't really an option. it likely wouldn't be that way on the real test.

You see, the data sufficiency questions always work out. It's not possible that the conditions in this town actually exist. On the data sufficiency, the question writer always starts with a real problem with a real answer and then takes information away, not the other way around.

If he's taken away too much information, and doesn't give enough back int he statements, then it's E. But he won't give back information that doesn't work out, because he won't change the information he started with.

That's why the two statements will never contradict each other, because they apply to that same question.

Does that make sense?
User avatar
saurya_s
Joined: 08 Jul 2004
Last visit: 14 Aug 2006
Posts: 319
Own Kudos:
Posts: 319
Kudos: 2,375
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Ian
What you are saying does make sense. I got this question from som ebody in the forum. so it might not be correct.
S
User avatar
ian7777
Joined: 09 Mar 2003
Last visit: 24 Jan 2010
Posts: 227
Own Kudos:
Posts: 227
Kudos: 178
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Fair enough. Data sufficiencies are hard to wrap your head around. they have a lot of nuances that make them very difficult for many people. The less noise, the better, so I'm glad we had an opportunity to discuss one like this. Hopefully it will help people better understand ds as a whole.



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Data Sufficiency (DS) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
Math Expert
105388 posts
GMAT Tutor
1924 posts