Last visit was: 06 Sep 2026, 15:17 It is currently 06 Sep 2026, 15:17
Home
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 06 Sep 2026
Posts: 113,167
Own Kudos:
839,574
 [7]
Given Kudos: 111,337
Products:
GMAT Club Tests
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 113,167
Kudos: 839,574
 [7]
During the Jenovian War, about 128,000 Karthusian civilians died in 15 Apr 2025, 00:30
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
6
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
Hide
Show
History
B
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

60% (01:28) correct 40% (01:52) wrong based on 267 sessions

History

Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
During the Jenovian War, about 128,000 Karthusian civilians died in Karthusia, and about the same number of Karthusian soldiers died in battle. On the basis of these figures, it can be hypothesized that it was just as life-threatening to be a Karthusian civilian at that time as it was to be a Karthusian soldier.

Which of the following, if it could be carried out, would be most useful in an evaluation of the above hypothesis?

A. Separating between civilian deaths directly related to the war and civilian deaths not related to the war such as deaths caused by old age or natural causes

B. Comparing the percentage of death rates in each group rather than comparing the total numbers of deaths

C. Adding the number of war-related injuries in each group to the number of deaths

D. Comparing the number of deaths among male civilians with the number of deaths among Karthusian soldiers

E. Comparing the number of deaths among Karthusian civilians with the number of deaths among civilians in countries Karthusia was at war with during that time


­
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
B
User avatar
HadjiMurad
User avatar
Joined: 12 Nov 2024
Last visit: 14 May 2025
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
16
 [3]
Given Kudos: 8
Posts: 8
Kudos: 16
 [3]
During the Jenovian War, about 128,000 Karthusian civilians died in 15 Apr 2025, 07:44
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think the answer is B.
A - it's could be an answer, but it doesn't seem to be exactly what we looking for, while the question "most useful". Just leave it as an option
B - precisely what we need. From "it was just as life-threatening to be a Karthusian civilian at that time as it was to be a Karthusian soldier" we need to know, "is it as dangerous to be civilian as soldier?". From finding out what 128 000 is a percentage of total amount civilians/soldiers we can conclude that.
C - injuries - does not matter
D - only male - not sufficient
E - they comparing civilians from distinct sites, does not relate to main point. Can't help us to provide argument to prove hypothesis.
User avatar
Dereno
User avatar
Joined: 22 May 2020
Last visit: 30 Jul 2026
Posts: 1,399
Own Kudos:
1,417
 [1]
Given Kudos: 433
Posts: 1,399
Kudos: 1,417
 [1]
During the Jenovian War, about 128,000 Karthusian civilians died in 15 Apr 2025, 12:34
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
During the Jenovian War, about 128,000 Karthusian civilians died in Karthusia, and about the same number of Karthusian soldiers died in battle. On the basis of these figures, it can be hypothesized that it was just as life-threatening to be a Karthusian civilian at that time as it was to be a Karthusian soldier.

Which of the following, if it could be carried out, would be most useful in an evaluation of the above hypothesis?

A. Separating between civilian deaths directly related to the war and civilian deaths not related to the war such as deaths caused by old age or natural causes

B. Comparing the percentage of death rates in each group rather than comparing the total numbers of deaths

C. Adding the number of war-related injuries in each group to the number of deaths

D. Comparing the number of deaths among male civilians with the number of deaths among Karthusian soldiers

E. Comparing the number of deaths among Karthusian civilians with the number of deaths among civilians in countries Karthusia was at war with during that time


­
Show more
During a war, the number of civilians belonging to karthusia who are dead equals the number of Karthusian soldiers who died in battle.

The hypothesis is that : it was just as life-threatening to be a Karthusian civilian at that time as it was to be a Karthusian soldier. What EXTRA information do we need to ascertain this hypothesis.

Let’s see the options now.

A. Separating between civilian deaths directly related to the war and civilian deaths not related to the war such as deaths caused by old age or natural causes

comparison is between civilian and soldier deaths. So out of scope.

B. Comparing the percentage of death rates in each group rather than comparing the total numbers of deaths

The percentage of deaths that happen in each group with respect to the total population of each group provides a more accurate picture on the death rate for civilians and soldiers. So, if more deaths happened per population of soldiers compared to civilian group. We can say the hypothesis is wrong.

C. Adding the number of war-related injuries in each group to the number of deaths

Adding war injuries to death might skew the data more towards soliders death. Hence eliminated.

D. Comparing the number of deaths among male civilians with the number of deaths among Karthusian soldiers

Civilian death is not only confined to male civilians alone. Hence out of scope.

E. Comparing the number of deaths among Karthusian civilians with the number of deaths among civilians in countries Karthusia was at war with during that time

Comparison with other countries doesn’t add value to the hypothesis in question. Hence, out of scope.

Answer is Option B
User avatar
Sketchitesh
User avatar
Joined: 29 Nov 2024
Last visit: 09 Feb 2026
Posts: 141
Own Kudos:
114
Given Kudos: 19
Concentration: Operations, Finance
Schools: INSEAD Jan '26 Kellogg Yale
GPA: 7.2
WE:Operations (Other)
Products:
My Reviews
Schools: INSEAD Jan '26 Kellogg Yale
Posts: 141
Kudos: 114
During the Jenovian War, about 128,000 Karthusian civilians died in 16 Apr 2025, 00:05
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hypothesis is it was equal life threating to be a civilian or soldier
A. focusing on cause of death which does not matter. (Irrelevant)
B. %of death rate of both group can give better picture. what if %death rate of civilian is 20% while soldier is 80% . Keep it
C. Adding war injuries to war deaths ( Out of scope)
D. Comparing deaths of male (Irrelevant)
E. Comparing deaths with other contries (Out of scope)

B is answer
Bunuel
During the Jenovian War, about 128,000 Karthusian civilians died in Karthusia, and about the same number of Karthusian soldiers died in battle. On the basis of these figures, it can be hypothesized that it was just as life-threatening to be a Karthusian civilian at that time as it was to be a Karthusian soldier.

Which of the following, if it could be carried out, would be most useful in an evaluation of the above hypothesis?

A. Separating between civilian deaths directly related to the war and civilian deaths not related to the war such as deaths caused by old age or natural causes

B. Comparing the percentage of death rates in each group rather than comparing the total numbers of deaths

C. Adding the number of war-related injuries in each group to the number of deaths

D. Comparing the number of deaths among male civilians with the number of deaths among Karthusian soldiers

E. Comparing the number of deaths among Karthusian civilians with the number of deaths among civilians in countries Karthusia was at war with during that time


­
Show more
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 06 Sep 2026
Posts: 113,167
Own Kudos:
839,574
Given Kudos: 111,337
Products:
GMAT Club Tests
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 113,167
Kudos: 839,574
During the Jenovian War, about 128,000 Karthusian civilians died in 04 May 2025, 01:15
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post

OFFICIAL EXPLANATION



During the Jenovian War, about 128,000 Karthusian civilians died in Karthusia, and about the same number of Karthusian soldiers died in battle. On the basis of these figures, it can be hypothesized that it was just as life-threatening to be a Karthusian civilian at that time as it was to be a Karthusian soldier.

Which of the following, if it could be carried out, would be most useful in an evaluation of the above hypothesis?


A. Separating between civilian deaths directly related to the war and civilian deaths not related to the war such as deaths caused by old age or natural causes

Incorrect.

In this variation of Investigation questions, you are required to find which method of investigation will be most useful in evaluating the conclusion. To do so, first break down the argument. The first sentence is factual - a premise. The second sentence uses the conclusion phrase hypothesized that, marking it as the conclusion:


Premise: In the Jenovian War the same number of Karthusian civilians and Karthusian soldiers died
=
Hypothesis: it was just as dangerous being a Karthusian civilian as it was being a Karthusian soldier

Relevant Investigation: ?

The correct answer is a method of investigation which could support or weaken the conclusion depending on its outcome, i.e., an investigation that tests the most crucial factor.

This answer choice suggests a separation which would not shed any light on the comparison between the civilians and the soldiers. Even if all 128,000 civilians died of old age that would not change the fact that they died during the war. Since the conclusion is about danger to one's life at that time and not "because of the war", we cannot separate war and non-war causes of death.


B. Comparing the percentage of death rates in each group rather than comparing the total numbers of deaths

The above hypothesis relies on the assumption that the number of civilians and the number of soldiers was about the same. If the assumption is invalid - for example, if there had been at that time 200,000 Karthusian soldiers and 10,000,000 Karthusian civilians - then the similar number of deaths does not reflect a similar level of danger.

Comparing percentages rather than total numbers allows a valid comparison of two groups that are not the same size.


C. Adding the number of war-related injuries in each group to the number of deaths

Incorrect.

In this variation of Investigation questions, you are required to find which method of investigation will be most useful in evaluating the conclusion. To do so, first break down the argument. The first sentence is factual - a premise. The second sentence uses the conclusion phrase hypothesized that, marking it as the conclusion:


Premise: In the Jenovian War the same number of Karthusian civilians and Karthusian soldiers died
=
Hypothesis: it was just as dangerous being a Karthusian civilian as it was being a Karthusian soldier

Relevant Investigation: ?

The correct answer is a method of investigation which could support or weaken the conclusion depending on its outcome, i.e., an investigation that tests the most crucial factor.

Mixing deaths with injuries in this comparison, as suggested by this answer choice, will not help evaluate the conclusion as the conclusion revolves around the risk of death (life-threatening).


D. Comparing the number of deaths among male civilians with the number of deaths among Karthusian soldiers

Incorrect.

While it is possible that most Karthusian soldiers were men, comparing civilian men and soldiers would not helps us affirm or disprove the hypothesis that civilians of any kind - be it infant, child, man or woman - were under the same threat to their lives as were Karthusian soldiers during the war.


E. Comparing the number of deaths among Karthusian civilians with the number of deaths among civilians in countries Karthusia was at war with during that time

Incorrect.

This answer choice does not provide a method of analyzing the hypothesis as it deals with deaths among civilians only. Instead of comparing Karthusian civilians with Karthusian soldiers, it compares Karthusian civilians with civilians in other countries.
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7399 posts
AbhishekP220108
Verbal Forum Moderator
705 posts