It is currently 14 Dec 2017, 00:33

# Decision(s) Day!:

CHAT Rooms | Ross R1 | Kellogg R1 | Darden R1 | Tepper R1

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# During the three months before and the three months after a

Author Message
Director
Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 921

Kudos [?]: 282 [0], given: 0

During the three months before and the three months after a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Dec 2005, 16:36
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

75% (00:00) correct 25% (00:00) wrong based on 11 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

During the three months before and the three months after a major earthquake in California, students at a college there happened to be keeping a record of their dreams. After experiencing the earthquake, half of the students reported dreaming about earthquakes. During the same six months, a group of college students in Ontario who had never experienced an earthquake also recorded their dreams. Almost none of the students in Ontario reported dreaming about earthquakes. So it is clear that experiencing an earthquake can cause people to dream about earthquakes.

Which of the following , if true, most strengthens the argument?

A) before the california earthquake, no more of the students in California than those in Ontario recorded dreams about earthquakes

b) the students in California were members of a class studying dreams and dream recollection, but the students in Ontario were not.

c) Before they started keeping records of their dreams,, many of the students in California had experienced at least one earthquake.

D) the students in Ontario reported having more dreams overall, per student, than the students in California did.

E) the students in Ontario who reported having dreams about earthquatkes recored the dreams as having occurred after the California earthquake.

Kudos [?]: 282 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 1705

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

22 Dec 2005, 17:34
little confusing between A and C.

chosed A before. but should go with C.

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 21 Sep 2003
Posts: 1057

Kudos [?]: 82 [0], given: 0

Location: USA

### Show Tags

22 Dec 2005, 18:33
Vote for (C)

A and E distantly support the same idea. C seems to support the conclusion better.

Kudos [?]: 82 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 921

Kudos [?]: 282 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

22 Dec 2005, 18:44
oa is A

I also chose C at first

Kudos [?]: 282 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 1705

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

22 Dec 2005, 18:48
HIMALAYA wrote:
little confusing between A and C.

chosed A before. but should go with C.

i posted A before as "many" doesnot tell anymore. ok i was correct but could not stood with it for a long..............

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 921

Kudos [?]: 282 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

22 Dec 2005, 18:51
its ok himalaya, this was a confusing one. I still dont get A. I used pOE to get to a and C

Kudos [?]: 282 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 22 Nov 2005
Posts: 137

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

22 Dec 2005, 18:57
It is definitely A. The argument can be strengthened only if the group of people who have started seeing these dreams did not see it before the earthquake. A birgs out this reasoning.

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 921

Kudos [?]: 282 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

22 Dec 2005, 19:03
thanks plsubbu that makes sense

Kudos [?]: 282 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 06 Jun 2004
Posts: 1050

Kudos [?]: 188 [0], given: 0

Location: CA

### Show Tags

22 Dec 2005, 20:30

ETS loves to test these kind of questions where it presents ratios/numbers to present cause-effect

One way to weaken the argument is to find out the relative umber for the before event and see if the effect would still stand.
_________________

Don't be afraid to take a flying leap of faith.. If you risk nothing, than you gain nothing...

Kudos [?]: 188 [0], given: 0

CEO
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2892

Kudos [?]: 337 [0], given: 0

Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008

### Show Tags

22 Dec 2005, 23:24
HIMALAYA wrote:
HIMALAYA wrote:
little confusing between A and C.

chosed A before. but should go with C.

i posted A before as "many" doesnot tell anymore. ok i was correct but could not stood with it for a long..............

Himalaya, Always trust your first instinct. I was in the same situtation but got A due to first instinct.
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

Kudos [?]: 337 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 1705

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Dec 2005, 07:34
ps_dahiya wrote:
HIMALAYA wrote:
HIMALAYA wrote:
little confusing between A and C.

chosed A before. but should go with C.

i posted A before as "many" doesnot tell anymore. ok i was correct but could not stood with it for a long..............

Himalaya, Always trust your first instinct. I was in the same situtation but got A due to first instinct.

i will. thankx....................................

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798

Kudos [?]: 174 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Dec 2005, 08:23
I got A. Here is my reasoning. Both califorians and ontarians recorded and recollected dreams. But if during the pre-earthquake period the size of earthquake dreamers are not realistically compared then the experiment would not lend support. So before the earthquake both the number of dreamer should be approximatley same.

Kudos [?]: 174 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 30 Jan 2016
Posts: 324

Kudos [?]: 240 [0], given: 97

Location: United States (MA)
During the three months before and the three months [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jun 2017, 05:39
During the three months before and the three
months after a major earthquake in California,
students at a college there happened to be keeping a
record of their dreams. After experiencing the
earthquake, half of the students reported dreaming
about earthquakes. During the same six months, a
group of college students in Ontario who had never
experienced an earthquake also recorded their drams.
Almost none of the students in Ontario reported
dreaming about earthquakes. So it is clear that
experiencing an earthquake can cause people to

Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens
the argument?

(A) Before the California earthquake, no more of
the students in California than of those in
(B) The students in California were members of a
class studying dreams and dream recollection,
but the students in Ontario were not.
(C) Before they started keeping records of their
dreams, many of the students in California
had experienced at least one earthquake.
(D) The students in Ontario reported having more
dreams overall, per student, than the students
in California did.
(E) The students in Ontario who reported having
dreams as having occurred after the
California earthquake.

Sourc: LSAT

Kudos!
_________________

+1 Kudos is the best way to say "Thank you!"

Kudos [?]: 240 [0], given: 97

During the three months before and the three months   [#permalink] 13 Jun 2017, 05:39
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# During the three months before and the three months after a

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.