GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 21 Feb 2019, 14:31

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

## Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in February
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
272829303112
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
242526272812
Open Detailed Calendar

February 21, 2019

February 21, 2019

10:00 PM PST

11:00 PM PST

Kick off your 2019 GMAT prep with a free 7-day boot camp that includes free online lessons, webinars, and a full GMAT course access. Limited for the first 99 registrants! Feb. 21st until the 27th.
• ### Free GMAT RC Webinar

February 23, 2019

February 23, 2019

07:00 AM PST

09:00 AM PST

Learn reading strategies that can help even non-voracious reader to master GMAT RC. Saturday, February 23rd at 7 AM PT

# During the U.S. Supreme Court case of 1857, Dred Scott v. Sandford, tw

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Retired Moderator
Status: The best is yet to come.....
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 501
During the U.S. Supreme Court case of 1857, Dred Scott v. Sandford, tw  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jul 2017, 04:11
1
8
00:00

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

38% (01:49) correct 62% (01:49) wrong based on 180 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

During the U.S. Supreme Court case of 1857, Dred Scott v. Sandford, two justices opposed the judgment for the defendant, half as many as later dissented with another landmark case, 2000’s Bush v. Gore.

A. judgment for the defendant, half as many as later dissented with

B. defendant’s judgment, half those that gave their dissent later in

C. judgment of the defendant, half the number as dissented later on

D. defendant’s judgment, which was half the ones who later dissented in

E. judgment for the defendant, half those who later dissented in

_________________

Hasan Mahmud

Retired Moderator
Status: The best is yet to come.....
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 501
During the U.S. Supreme Court case of 1857, Dred Scott v. Sandford, tw  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jul 2017, 04:12
1
OE

It is more idiomatic to say that the judges dissented in a case, or that the judges dissented from an opinion or interpretation than to say the judges dissented with a case.

The correct response is (E), “those” is the correct pronoun to refer back to “justices,” while “later dissented in another landmark case” correctly uses a past-tense verb.

If you chose (A), “half as many as later dissented” is not correct. This answer choice appears to be saying “two is half as many as later dissented” A better way of expressing this comparison is to say “two is half the number that later dissented”. Additionally, it is more idiomatic to say “the judges dissented in a landmark case” than to say “the judges dissented with a landmark case”. You can disagree with the verdict reached in a case, but you don’t disagree with the case itself.

If you chose (B), since “those” refers to people, the “justices,” we cannot use the pronoun “that.” Only “who” and “whom” can refer to people.

If you chose (C), the phrase “judgment of the defendant” here implies that the defendant was the one making the judgment, which is clearly false. In addition, the phrase “half the number as dissented later on” is needlessly wordy. Look for a more concise choice.

If you chose (D), “the ones” is an awkward choice of pronoun. Additionally, since the pronoun “which” refers to the immediately preceding noun (judgment), this answer choice appears to be saying “the judgment was half the ones who later dissented in…”

http://www.gmatpracticequestions.com/gm ... tice-test/
_________________

Hasan Mahmud

Manager
Joined: 02 Nov 2015
Posts: 165
GMAT 1: 640 Q49 V29
Re: During the U.S. Supreme Court case of 1857, Dred Scott v. Sandford, tw  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jul 2017, 05:59
Came down to A and E . ?as per the sentence, I feel judgement for is right.
Selected E.

Sent from my Lenovo TAB S8-50LC using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
Director
Joined: 21 Mar 2016
Posts: 521
Re: During the U.S. Supreme Court case of 1857, Dred Scott v. Sandford, tw  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jul 2017, 06:34
judgement for is right,,,, so came down to A and E...

in A two justices opposed is properly compared with half the number of justices who opposed another case,,,

luks like A for me,,,,
whats the OA??
Retired Moderator
Status: The best is yet to come.....
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 501
Re: During the U.S. Supreme Court case of 1857, Dred Scott v. Sandford, tw  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Aug 2017, 22:50
mikemcgarry

Dear Mike,

I have a query regarding the OA. Is the usage of 'those who' correct?

In a reply to the following topic by EMPOWERgmatRichC it is said that 'those who' is Incorrect. ‘Who’ referring to ‘those’ is redundant.

In a blow to those who still harbored the illusion that E-mail exchanges are private, a watchdog group recently uncovered a trick for enabling an interloper to rig an E-mail message so that this person will be privy to any comments that a recipient had added as the message is forwarded to others or sent back and forth. (https://gmatclub.com/forum/in-a-blow-to ... 39698.html)

Expert opinion is highly solicited.
_________________

Hasan Mahmud

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 3637
Re: During the U.S. Supreme Court case of 1857, Dred Scott v. Sandford, tw  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Jan 2019, 11:49
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
Re: During the U.S. Supreme Court case of 1857, Dred Scott v. Sandford, tw   [#permalink] 26 Jan 2019, 11:49
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# During the U.S. Supreme Court case of 1857, Dred Scott v. Sandford, tw

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.