It is currently 19 Sep 2017, 21:09

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

During the U.S. Supreme Court case of 1857, Dred Scott v. Sandford, tw

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Status: The best is yet to come.....
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 406

Kudos [?]: 142 [1], given: 172

GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
During the U.S. Supreme Court case of 1857, Dred Scott v. Sandford, tw [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Jul 2017, 05:11
1
This post received
KUDOS
6
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  85% (hard)

Question Stats:

38% (01:11) correct 63% (01:23) wrong based on 113 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

During the U.S. Supreme Court case of 1857, Dred Scott v. Sandford, two justices opposed the judgment for the defendant, half as many as later dissented with another landmark case, 2000’s Bush v. Gore.

A. judgment for the defendant, half as many as later dissented with

B. defendant’s judgment, half those that gave their dissent later in

C. judgment of the defendant, half the number as dissented later on

D. defendant’s judgment, which was half the ones who later dissented in

E. judgment for the defendant, half those who later dissented in
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Hasan Mahmud

Kudos [?]: 142 [1], given: 172

1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Status: The best is yet to come.....
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 406

Kudos [?]: 142 [1], given: 172

GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
During the U.S. Supreme Court case of 1857, Dred Scott v. Sandford, tw [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Jul 2017, 05:12
1
This post received
KUDOS
OE

It is more idiomatic to say that the judges dissented in a case, or that the judges dissented from an opinion or interpretation than to say the judges dissented with a case.

The correct response is (E), “those” is the correct pronoun to refer back to “justices,” while “later dissented in another landmark case” correctly uses a past-tense verb.

If you chose (A), “half as many as later dissented” is not correct. This answer choice appears to be saying “two is half as many as later dissented” A better way of expressing this comparison is to say “two is half the number that later dissented”. Additionally, it is more idiomatic to say “the judges dissented in a landmark case” than to say “the judges dissented with a landmark case”. You can disagree with the verdict reached in a case, but you don’t disagree with the case itself.

If you chose (B), since “those” refers to people, the “justices,” we cannot use the pronoun “that.” Only “who” and “whom” can refer to people.

If you chose (C), the phrase “judgment of the defendant” here implies that the defendant was the one making the judgment, which is clearly false. In addition, the phrase “half the number as dissented later on” is needlessly wordy. Look for a more concise choice.

If you chose (D), “the ones” is an awkward choice of pronoun. Additionally, since the pronoun “which” refers to the immediately preceding noun (judgment), this answer choice appears to be saying “the judgment was half the ones who later dissented in…”


http://www.gmatpracticequestions.com/gm ... tice-test/
_________________

Hasan Mahmud

Kudos [?]: 142 [1], given: 172

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 02 Nov 2015
Posts: 174

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 120

GMAT 1: 640 Q49 V29
Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: During the U.S. Supreme Court case of 1857, Dred Scott v. Sandford, tw [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Jul 2017, 06:59
Came down to A and E . ?as per the sentence, I feel judgement for is right.
Selected E.


Sent from my Lenovo TAB S8-50LC using GMAT Club Forum mobile app

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 120

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 21 Mar 2016
Posts: 464

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 85

Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: During the U.S. Supreme Court case of 1857, Dred Scott v. Sandford, tw [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Jul 2017, 07:34
judgement for is right,,,, so came down to A and E...

in A two justices opposed is properly compared with half the number of justices who opposed another case,,,

luks like A for me,,,,
whats the OA??

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 85

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Status: The best is yet to come.....
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 406

Kudos [?]: 142 [0], given: 172

GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: During the U.S. Supreme Court case of 1857, Dred Scott v. Sandford, tw [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Aug 2017, 23:50
mikemcgarry

Dear Mike,

I have a query regarding the OA. Is the usage of 'those who' correct?

In a reply to the following topic by EMPOWERgmatRichC it is said that 'those who' is Incorrect. ‘Who’ referring to ‘those’ is redundant.

In a blow to those who still harbored the illusion that E-mail exchanges are private, a watchdog group recently uncovered a trick for enabling an interloper to rig an E-mail message so that this person will be privy to any comments that a recipient had added as the message is forwarded to others or sent back and forth. (https://gmatclub.com/forum/in-a-blow-to ... 39698.html)

Expert opinion is highly solicited.
_________________

Hasan Mahmud

Kudos [?]: 142 [0], given: 172

Re: During the U.S. Supreme Court case of 1857, Dred Scott v. Sandford, tw   [#permalink] 02 Aug 2017, 23:50
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 After much deliberation, The Supreme Court determined, by guerrero25 10 03 Apr 2013, 18:38
13 The telecom minister had been indicted by the Supreme court getgyan 15 21 Jun 2017, 00:10
87 EXPERTS_POSTS_IN_THIS_TOPIC Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution RohitKalla 61 31 Jul 2017, 08:22
16 EXPERTS_POSTS_IN_THIS_TOPIC Although the Supreme Court ruled as long ago as 1880 that goalsnr 48 05 Feb 2017, 13:04
2 In the most bizarre court case this month, zrezre 3 14 Aug 2017, 11:57
Display posts from previous: Sort by

During the U.S. Supreme Court case of 1857, Dred Scott v. Sandford, tw

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.