Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 18:56 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 18:56
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Gladiator59
Joined: 16 Sep 2016
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 839
Own Kudos:
2,613
 [30]
Given Kudos: 260
Status:It always seems impossible until it's done.
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V42
Products:
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V42
Posts: 839
Kudos: 2,613
 [30]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
25
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
yash312
Joined: 28 Aug 2018
Last visit: 24 Feb 2025
Posts: 160
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 22
Posts: 160
Kudos: 175
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Rakeshtewatia
Joined: 03 Jul 2017
Last visit: 04 Jan 2020
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Accounting
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Posts: 23
Kudos: 13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
philipssonicare
Joined: 15 Feb 2018
Last visit: 22 Nov 2022
Posts: 412
Own Kudos:
431
 [2]
Given Kudos: 2,380
Posts: 412
Kudos: 431
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Editorialist: The positions advanced by radical environmentalists often contain hypotheses that are false and proposals that are economically infeasible. But there is a positive role to be played even by these extremists, for the social and political inertia that attends environmental issues is so stubborn that even small areas of progress can be made only if the populace fears environmental disaster, however untenable the reasons for those fears may be.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main conclusion of the editorialist’s argument?

(A) The little progress that has been made in improving the environment is mainly due to the fear created by radical environmentalists.
This is assuming too much. The piece doesn't say that little progress has been made. Additionally, 'even small...progress...made only...fear' allows other ways for fear to be generated (a mudslide destroying a town may elicit more fear than a guy with a placard).
Not great.
(B) Radical environmentalists, by promoting their views, stimulate progress on environmental issues.
This is better. Does the pieces discuss radical environmentalists? Yes, mentioned first sentence. Does it mention their views being promoted? Yes. It states they are factually inaccurate. Does it say those views create progress? Yes, small progress. This does not limit other forms of progress, other people having views etc. Non-extreme language.
B
(C) Social and political inertia is most effectively overcome by an extremely fearful populace, regardless of whether its fears are well-founded.
Most effectively causes a problem like it did in A. The piece only discusses environmental issues, not all areas that have social and political inertia. A real life example being gay marriage in the West, which may have been pushed more by positive messages than fears of gays being marginalised etc
B
(D) Radical environmentalists often put forth untenable positions in order to produce the fear that is required to bring about moderate reforms.
Has all the ideas from the piece but links them incorrectly. Untenable positions. Fear. Reform. But, as above, maybe they do it to promote positive aspects, not fear. "save the great barrier reef for the low low price of $10" doesn't elicit fear, but it is untenable.
B
(E) Radical environmentalists advocate positions without regard for factual support or economic feasibility.
'without regard' is the problem here. e.g. teach my friend some maths, after having read something about a formula, and still give wrong information. Tried to present a factually supported position, but made mistakes/don't know stuff etc
B
User avatar
sssanskaar
Joined: 09 Aug 2020
Last visit: 09 Oct 2022
Posts: 221
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 163
Location: India
Schools: IIMA PGPX'23
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V39 (Online)
Schools: IIMA PGPX'23
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V39 (Online)
Posts: 221
Kudos: 119
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Gladiator59
Editorialist: The positions advanced by radical environmentalists often contain hypotheses that are false and proposals that are economically infeasible. But there is a positive role to be played even by these extremists, for the social and political inertia that attends environmental issues is so stubborn that even small areas of progress can be made only if the populace fears environmental disaster, however untenable the reasons for those fears may be.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main conclusion of the editorialist’s argument?

(A) The little progress that has been made in improving the environment is mainly due to the fear created by radical environmentalists.
(B) Radical environmentalists, by promoting their views, stimulate progress on environmental issues.
(C) Social and political inertia is most effectively overcome by an extremely fearful populace, regardless of whether its fears are well-founded.
(D) Radical environmentalists often put forth untenable positions in order to produce the fear that is required to bring about moderate reforms.
(E) Radical environmentalists advocate positions without regard for factual support or economic feasibility.

The portion in bold is the conclusion of the argument. Only option B is on the similar lines.
User avatar
Crytiocanalyst
Joined: 16 Jun 2021
Last visit: 27 May 2023
Posts: 950
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 309
Posts: 950
Kudos: 208
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A) The little progress that has been made in improving the environment is mainly due to the fear created by radical environmentalists.
This is subjective since the progress could be due to some other factors therefore we are not in a position to comment on the same -hence out

(B) Radical environmentalists, by promoting their views, stimulate progress on environmental issues.
This can be infered since their constant strikes has a possiblity of bringing in a change

(C) Social and political inertia is most effectively overcome by an extremely fearful populace, regardless of whether its fears are well-founded.
efeectiveness is a relative term and can have multiple implication on the given premise - hence out

(D) Radical environmentalists often put forth untenable positions in order to produce the fear that is required to bring about moderate reforms.
These are untenable cannot be infered and the moderate reforms is also completely subjective - hence out

(E) Radical environmentalists advocate positions without regard for factual support or economic feasibility.
This too is speculation and cannot be infered from the given subject -hence out
Hence IMO B
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,835
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,835
Kudos: 986
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts