Last visit was: 20 Nov 2025, 02:26 It is currently 20 Nov 2025, 02:26
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
Akshat_verma_25
Joined: 26 Jan 2024
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 65
Own Kudos:
40
 [1]
Given Kudos: 59
Products:
Posts: 65
Kudos: 40
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Akshat_verma_25
Joined: 26 Jan 2024
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 65
Own Kudos:
40
 [1]
Given Kudos: 59
Products:
Posts: 65
Kudos: 40
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,108
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 700
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,108
Kudos: 32,888
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Akshat_verma_25
Joined: 26 Jan 2024
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 65
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 59
Products:
Posts: 65
Kudos: 40
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
egmat

Akshat_verma_25 I can see you've done excellent critical thinking here - you correctly identified the gap in the study's sample! The confusion stems from a crucial detail in the question stem that determines which argument you're supposed to support.

The Key Issue: Which Claim Are You Strengthening?

The question asks: "Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the claim that first-graders who are graduates of preschool programs perform better academically?"

This is asking you to strengthen the prevailing opinion (that preschool HELPS), NOT the study's finding (that showed no benefit for males).

Why Option D is Correct

Option D: "Urban first-graders who are graduates of preschool programs receive better grades than do other urban first-graders."

This directly demonstrates that in urban settings, preschool graduates DO perform better academically. This strengthens the prevailing opinion by providing concrete evidence that preschool helps - at least for certain populations - despite the study's findings about males.

What Went Wrong in Your Approach

Your instinct about representative samples was actually excellent CR thinking! You correctly identified that the study only examined male first-graders, which is indeed a limitation.

However, you then tried to prove the male sample was representative to support the study's conclusion. But the question asks you to do the opposite - strengthen the prevailing opinion that preschool does help, which the study challenged.

The gap you identified (males-only sample) actually weakens the study's ability to disprove the prevailing opinion. Option D goes further by providing positive evidence that preschool does benefit students in at least one context.

I hope this clears up your confusion! Feel free to ask any follow-up questions you may have.

Now I understand clearly where I was lacking and what I should have done. I had identified the claim that needed to be strengthened and was confident about it. However, I was anticipating an answer that would weaken the idea that the male first-graders in the study were representative of the whole first-grade population. I thought that by weakening the representativeness of the sample, I could strengthen the claim that first-graders who attended preschool actually perform better.

That kind of strengthener would have been a strong approach — it would show that the study’s conclusion doesn’t apply to all first-graders, only to the male subgroup. But since that option wasn’t present, I failed to shift my thinking toward directly strengthening the claim itself. That was my main mistake.

I think sometimes when we pre-think, we narrow our scope too much. In this case, I forgot to keep in mind that strengthening can happen in two ways: by undermining the evidence against the claim or by adding new evidence that directly supports it. I focused only on the first route and missed the second.

I hope I’m on the right track. If not, kindly correct my dumb brain so I can control its flow in the most absolutely dumb way possible.
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,108
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 700
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,108
Kudos: 32,888
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Akshat_verma_25 Your understanding is absolutely correct now :)

And your question wasn't dumb at all. It all comes down to mastering the pre-thinking approach. I'd highly recommend going through the pre-thinking module here (it's available for free). This will help you understand how to pre-think the right way as well as apply it to different types of questions in CR.

All the best for your prep!
Akshat_verma_25


Now I understand clearly where I was lacking and what I should have done. I had identified the claim that needed to be strengthened and was confident about it. However, I was anticipating an answer that would weaken the idea that the male first-graders in the study were representative of the whole first-grade population. I thought that by weakening the representativeness of the sample, I could strengthen the claim that first-graders who attended preschool actually perform better.

That kind of strengthener would have been a strong approach — it would show that the study’s conclusion doesn’t apply to all first-graders, only to the male subgroup. But since that option wasn’t present, I failed to shift my thinking toward directly strengthening the claim itself. That was my main mistake.

I think sometimes when we pre-think, we narrow our scope too much. In this case, I forgot to keep in mind that strengthening can happen in two ways: by undermining the evidence against the claim or by adding new evidence that directly supports it. I focused only on the first route and missed the second.

I hope I’m on the right track. If not, kindly correct my dumb brain so I can control its flow in the most absolutely dumb way possible.
avatar
Akshat_verma_25
Joined: 26 Jan 2024
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 65
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 59
Products:
Posts: 65
Kudos: 40
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
egmat
Akshat_verma_25 Your understanding is absolutely correct now :)

And your question wasn't dumb at all. It all comes down to mastering the pre-thinking approach. I'd highly recommend going through the pre-thinking module here (it's available for free). This will help you understand how to pre-think the right way as well as apply it to different types of questions in CR.

All the best for your prep!


Yes you are absolutely right, I need to work more on my skills. Anyways, thanks for this document. Means a lot to me.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts