GMAT Question of the Day: Daily via email | Daily via Instagram New to GMAT Club? Watch this Video

 It is currently 03 Jun 2020, 20:24

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Either high cholesterol or unbalance homocysteine levels can,

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 13 Jan 2018
Posts: 30
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 530 Q46 V17
GMAT 2: 640 Q49 V28
Either high cholesterol or unbalance homocysteine levels can,  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 05 Dec 2018, 05:31
5
00:00

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

49% (01:23) correct 51% (01:38) wrong based on 225 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Either high cholesterol or unbalance homocysteine levels can, along with elevated blood pressure, be factors contributing to the incidence of heart disease in this country.

(A) can, along with elevated blood pressure, be factors contributing to
(B) along with elevated blood pressure, can one or the other be contributing factors in
(C) can, along with elevated blood pressure, contribute as factors to
(D) can be a contributing factor to, along with elevated blood pressure
(E) can contribute, along with elevated blood pressure, to

Originally posted by srij13 on 05 Dec 2018, 03:39.
Last edited by Abhishek009 on 05 Dec 2018, 05:31, edited 1 time in total.
Formatted for better representation
Veritas Prep Representative
Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Posts: 425
Re: Either high cholesterol or unbalance homocysteine levels can,  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Dec 2018, 07:33
1
Top Contributor
srij13 wrote:
I am confused between C and E.

I'd look at the problems with C in two ways:

1) The meaning is off. When you include the "as factors" caveat, you're attributing "as factors" as an important part of how they contribute. For example if you say "As a university employee, you can receive free tuition for your immediate family" -- there "as a university employee" is integral to your ability to receive tuition. Or "Stacy was able, as CEO, to turn the company's fortunes around" -- that means she did that as CEO, not in a previous capacity as VP or Director of Ops or whatever.

So...when C says "are able to contribute as factors to..." it's assigning extra value to "as factors" as integral to how high cholesterol or unbalanced homocysteine contribute heart disease. Which doesn't really make sense..."factors" is kind of a placeholder definition - whether or not we give them that designation doesn't really matter as to whether they can contribute to heart disease.

2) Redundancy. If they're contributing to heart disease, then they're automatically factors that lead to heart disease...we don't need to call that out specifically (especially because of point #1 - calling it out specifically creates a strange meaning). E says the same thing more concisely without that redundancy, and therefore has a much cleaner, more precise meaning.
_________________
Brian

Curriculum Developer, Instructor, and Host of Veritas Prep On Demand

Save \$100 on live Veritas Prep GMAT Courses and Admissions Consulting

Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options.

Veritas Prep Reviews
##### General Discussion
Board of Directors
Status: QA & VA Forum Moderator
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Posts: 5006
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
Re: Either high cholesterol or unbalance homocysteine levels can,  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Dec 2018, 05:36
2
1
srij13 wrote:
Either high cholesterol or unbalance homocysteine levels can, along with elevated blood pressure, be factors contributing to the incidence of heart disease in this country.

(A) can, along with elevated blood pressure, be factors contributing to
(B) along with elevated blood pressure, can one or the other be contributing factors in
(C) can, along with elevated blood pressure, contribute as factors to
(D) can be a contributing factor to, along with elevated blood pressure
(E) can contribute, along with elevated blood pressure, to

Meaning : Out of the 2 factors ( high cholesterol or unbalance homocysteine levels ) can contribute to the incidence of heart disease in the country.

Contribute to : Correct Idiomatic Usage

Either high cholesterol or unbalance homocysteine levels can contribute, along with elevated blood pressure, to the incidence of heart disease in this country.

Further Either X or Y : Correct Idiomatic usage and is correctly used in option (E), thus Answer must be (E)

_________________
Thanks and Regards

Abhishek....

PLEASE FOLLOW THE RULES FOR POSTING IN QA AND VA FORUM AND USE SEARCH FUNCTION BEFORE POSTING NEW QUESTIONS

How to use Search Function in GMAT Club | Rules for Posting in QA forum | Writing Mathematical Formulas |Rules for Posting in VA forum | Request Expert's Reply ( VA Forum Only )
Director
Joined: 02 Oct 2017
Posts: 679
Re: Either high cholesterol or unbalance homocysteine levels can,  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Dec 2018, 23:34
1
After seeing the options we can narrow down to C and E

Clearly E conveys meaning in better way as C includes factors and contribute which makes kind of redundancy.

Good explanations by
VeritasPrepBrian Abhishek009
Manager
Joined: 04 Jun 2010
Posts: 116
Location: India
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GPA: 3.22
Re: Either high cholesterol or unbalance homocysteine levels can,  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2019, 01:49
1
VeritasPrepBrian wrote:
srij13 wrote:
I am confused between C and E.

I'd look at the problems with C in two ways:

1) The meaning is off. When you include the "as factors" caveat, you're attributing "as factors" as an important part of how they contribute. For example if you say "As a university employee, you can receive free tuition for your immediate family" -- there "as a university employee" is integral to your ability to receive tuition. Or "Stacy was able, as CEO, to turn the company's fortunes around" -- that means she did that as CEO, not in a previous capacity as VP or Director of Ops or whatever.

So...when C says "are able to contribute as factors to..." it's assigning extra value to "as factors" as integral to how high cholesterol or unbalanced homocysteine contribute heart disease. Which doesn't really make sense..."factors" is kind of a placeholder definition - whether or not we give them that designation doesn't really matter as to whether they can contribute to heart disease.

2) Redundancy. If they're contributing to heart disease, then they're automatically factors that lead to heart disease...we don't need to call that out specifically (especially because of point #1 - calling it out specifically creates a strange meaning). E says the same thing more concisely without that redundancy, and therefore has a much cleaner, more precise meaning.

Dear Sir,

Is answer option A grammatically correct?? it sure is not concise or succinct How do we eliminate option A
Manager
Joined: 23 Feb 2019
Posts: 53
Re: Either high cholesterol or unbalance homocysteine levels can,  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2019, 05:47
avikroy wrote:
VeritasPrepBrian wrote:
srij13 wrote:
I am confused between C and E.

I'd look at the problems with C in two ways:

1) The meaning is off. When you include the "as factors" caveat, you're attributing "as factors" as an important part of how they contribute. For example if you say "As a university employee, you can receive free tuition for your immediate family" -- there "as a university employee" is integral to your ability to receive tuition. Or "Stacy was able, as CEO, to turn the company's fortunes around" -- that means she did that as CEO, not in a previous capacity as VP or Director of Ops or whatever.

So...when C says "are able to contribute as factors to..." it's assigning extra value to "as factors" as integral to how high cholesterol or unbalanced homocysteine contribute heart disease. Which doesn't really make sense..."factors" is kind of a placeholder definition - whether or not we give them that designation doesn't really matter as to whether they can contribute to heart disease.

2) Redundancy. If they're contributing to heart disease, then they're automatically factors that lead to heart disease...we don't need to call that out specifically (especially because of point #1 - calling it out specifically creates a strange meaning). E says the same thing more concisely without that redundancy, and therefore has a much cleaner, more precise meaning.

Dear Sir,

Is answer option A grammatically correct?? it sure is not concise or succinct How do we eliminate option A

Please why is A incorrect? Should "factors" be singular?
Veritas Prep Representative
Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Posts: 425
Re: Either high cholesterol or unbalance homocysteine levels can,  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2019, 07:20
1
Top Contributor
Good questions on (A). A couple things on (A):

1) The meaning there is off. If you look at the subject/verb setup, (A) says "either X or Y can be factors" (and then "contributing to..." qualifies what kind of factors) - this makes the fact that these conditions contribute to heart disease kind of an afterthought, vs. E which more directly says "they contribute to heart disease." The purpose of the sentence is to say that these conditions lead to heart disease...(A) kind of buries the headline by saying they're factors as the main thought, and then qualifying those types of factors also. (NOTE: A vs. E to me is a great example of why having five answer choices is a HUGE advantage vs. trying to edit a single sentence in isolation - I wouldn't necessarily see this meaning problem unless I compare A and E, but when I do I think "yeah that meaning in A is off").

Also "can be factors" puts the conditional "can be" in an odd spot - the conditional "sometimes but not always" isn't that these conditions could be factors, but that they could contribute to heart disease. "Can be factors" suggests that we don't know whether they're always factors...what we really don't know is whether these factors can cause heart disease.

Similarly the tense on "contributing" is off, too - that suggests that these are temporarily contributing to heart disease, but with scientific cause-and-effect, logically they either contribute to heart disease always, or they don't. There isn't a "during this limited period high cholesterol will cause heart disease, but after the summer solstice that won't be the case anymore" kind of thing. If it were "are factors that contribute" then we solve that problem by using a more definitive tense fitting of the scientific subject, but as written it's too temporary.

2) It's a tricky one but in an Either/Or construction, the singularity/plurality is dictated by the noun that comes after "or." And here although "levels" is plural, we're not really saying the levels themselves are what cause heart disease, but rather the state of them being unbalanced. You really should have "unbalanced homocysteine levels can be a factor," singular.

This is one that's pretty ugly - you wouldn't say "unbalanced levels is a factor" but rather "unbalanced levels are a factor"...as a test-taker what I love about E is that it just avoids the situation altogether. That's pretty classic GMAT - wrong answers introduce a really unique and odd structure, but instead of making you choose a unique grammatical structure, they give you an answer that just totally avoids it.
_________________
Brian

Curriculum Developer, Instructor, and Host of Veritas Prep On Demand

Save \$100 on live Veritas Prep GMAT Courses and Admissions Consulting

Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options.

Veritas Prep Reviews
Re: Either high cholesterol or unbalance homocysteine levels can,   [#permalink] 09 Aug 2019, 07:20