anish777
I have a question. The assumption in this argument was that if the speed humps could reduce the traffic speed and enhance safety in nearby towns, it can do the same in the mentioned town. But here we are assuming that speed humps were the only reason because of which the traffic speed was reduced. What if there is a different angle to it ? What if the speed limits itself was far less than the speed limits of the Ardane town and that might be the reason there was lesser traffic speed and more safety.
Option C exactly states this. Then can you please tell me why option C is not the right answer choice ?
GMATNinjaKarishmaBChiranjeevSinghIn most CR questions there is a comparison - sometimes obvious but at other times subtle. The comparison could be between two people, objects, states, time frames etc.
Here, the argument talks about 'reduction in speed' which effectively means 'reduction in speed from before'. In the towns, the speed reduced by 20-25% (of their own previous levels) and hence safety increased (compared with their own previous safety levels).
In Ardane too, speed humps could be made to reduce speed (compared with the current avg speed in Ardane and hence increase safety (compared with the current safety levels in Ardane). Hence everyone is being compared with their own selves in the past. We are not comparing towns with each other.
That is why (C) is out of scope for us.
Once you understand this fine point of CR questions, most CR questions will become very easy.