Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 15:15 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 15:15
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
605-655 Level|   Logical Flaw|                        
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,364
 [270]
29
Kudos
Add Kudos
241
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 11,238
Own Kudos:
43,706
 [58]
Given Kudos: 335
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,238
Kudos: 43,706
 [58]
37
Kudos
Add Kudos
20
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatVerbal
User avatar
EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Joined: 23 Feb 2015
Last visit: 17 Feb 2025
Posts: 1,694
Own Kudos:
15,177
 [18]
Given Kudos: 766
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,694
Kudos: 15,177
 [18]
14
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
SonalSinha803
Joined: 14 Feb 2018
Last visit: 18 Feb 2019
Posts: 306
Own Kudos:
319
 [5]
Given Kudos: 29
Posts: 306
Kudos: 319
 [5]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. On residential streets without speed humps, many vehicles travel at speeds more than 25 percent above the posted speed limit. - strengthens. Incorrect.

B. Because of their high weight, emergency vehicles such as fire trucks and ambulances must slow almost to a stop at speed humps. - irrelevant.

C. The residential speed limit in Ardane is higher than that of the nearby towns where speed humps were installed. - irrelevant.

D. //Motorists who are not familiar with the streets in Ardane's residential districts would be likely to encounter the speed humps unawares// ((unless warned by signs and painted indicators.)) - though first part might lead to something like it poses danger etc.; however, the second part makes it weird and kinda irrelevant. According to the second part the plan would be ok, if indicators are put. But, the argument doesn't say they won't put an indicator or vice versa. So it is a strengthener and also irrelevant.

E. Bicyclists generally prefer that speed humps be constructed so as to leave a space on the side of the road where //bicycles can travel //without going over// the humps.// - this casts a doubt whether the plan will succeed as the bicyclists might misuse it and chance of accidents would still exist and road safety is not guaranteed in this way.

Thus, to me E is best.

Sent from my Lenovo K53a48 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
User avatar
redskull1
Joined: 11 Feb 2018
Last visit: 25 Sep 2022
Posts: 294
Own Kudos:
213
 [6]
Given Kudos: 115
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V37
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
GMAT 3: 750 Q50 V42
Products:
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think this is B.Talking about safety.If ambulances and firefighters arrive late then there is danger to life.I thought this was straightforward.Or I am horribly wrong and need to do some brain rewiring.
User avatar
dave13
Joined: 09 Mar 2016
Last visit: 12 Aug 2025
Posts: 1,108
Own Kudos:
1,113
 [11]
Given Kudos: 3,851
Posts: 1,108
Kudos: 1,113
 [11]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
here is my reasoning :)

A. On residential streets without speed humps, many vehicles travel at speeds more than 25 percent above the posted speed limit.

this option favors installation of humps, so A is out

B. Because of their high weight, emergency vehicles such as fire trucks and ambulances must slow almost to a stop at speed humps.

this one is the most logical answer choice :) since we talk about installing humps that limit speed, it will definately be a problem for emergency vehicles :) just imagine an ambulance driving at a speed of 150mph, emergency pizza delivery in 10 minutes :)

C. The residential speed limit in Ardane is higher than that of the nearby towns where speed humps were installed.

this option gives information that speed in Ardane is higher. that means it strengths the initiative of installing humps, hence C is out

D. Motorists who are not familiar with the streets in Ardane's residential districts would be likely to encounter the speed humps unawares unless warned by signs and painted indicators.

this one doesnt give reason to not install humps, there will always be motorists unaware of humps :) everywhere in the world :) moreover the main topic isnt about motorists and painted indicators, we are concerned about speed limit d humps :) hence D is out

E. Bicyclists generally prefer that speed humps be constructed so as to leave a space on the side of the road where bicycles can travel without going over the humps.

this option is totally irrelevant , do we talk about Bicyclists ? no ! its about cars and speed limit :) hence E is out :)
avatar
jayarora
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 24 Oct 2016
Last visit: 26 Apr 2025
Posts: 163
Own Kudos:
237
 [6]
Given Kudos: 116
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GMAT 2: 760 Q50 V44 (Online)
GPA: 3.61
Products:
GMAT 2: 760 Q50 V44 (Online)
Posts: 163
Kudos: 237
 [6]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Enforcement of local speed limits through police monitoring has proven unsuccessful in the town of Ardane. In many nearby towns, speed humps (raised areas of pavement placed across residential streets, about 300 feet apart) have reduced traffic speeds on residential streets by 20 to 25 percent. In order to reduce traffic speed and thereby enhance safety in residential neighborhoods, Ardane's transportation commission plans to install multiple speed humps in those neighborhoods.

Which of the following, if true, identifies a potentially serious drawback to the plan for installing speed humps in Ardane?


Argument: Speed humps proved successful in nearby towns. Therefore, Arcane should install these speed humps to reduce traffic speed and thus ensure safety.
What sort of an answer choice we are looking for -> We need an answer choice that is a drawback for this plan. An answer choice that shows despite the installation, either traffic speed will not be reduced or safety will not be ensured. For example, say that installation of speed humps causes people to avoid certain routes and speed on others causing more accidents etc.

A. On residential streets without speed humps, many vehicles travel at speeds more than 25 percent above the posted speed limit.All the more reason to install the speed humps then! This is not a drawback

B. Because of their high weight, emergency vehicles such as fire trucks and ambulances must slow almost to a stop at speed humps.Ahh..so looks fire trucks and ambulances that are required in emergency situations would be impacted. If firetrucks slow down, fires would cause more damage than they would have had the trucks been quicker. Clearly, the safety of people is in question!

C. The residential speed limit in Ardane is higher than that of the nearby towns where speed humps were installed. All the more reason to have speed humps then! This choice gives us no reason to believe why the installation would not slow the traffic down.

D. Motorists who are not familiar with the streets in Ardane's residential districts would be likely to encounter the speed humps unawares unless warned by signs and painted indicators.Firstly, what proportion of people are unfamiliar with these streets? The argument does not tell us that. Moreover, warning signs could be a part of the installation process.

E. Bicyclists generally prefer that speed humps be constructed so as to leave a space on the side of the road where bicycles can travel without going over the humps.Good to know fact but does not tell us anything much! Even if transport commission adheres to the preference of the bicyclists, we have no reason to believe why the other traffic will not slow down.


NEW question from GMAT® Official Guide 2019


(CR04925)
User avatar
Skywalker18
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Last visit: 15 Nov 2023
Posts: 2,039
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 171
Status:Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Products:
Posts: 2,039
Kudos: 9,962
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Enforcement of local speed limits through police monitoring has proven unsuccessful in the town of Ardane. In many nearby towns, speed humps (raised areas of pavement placed across residential streets, about 300 feet apart) have reduced traffic speeds on residential streets by 20 to 25 percent. In order to reduce traffic speed and thereby enhance safety in residential neighborhoods, Ardane's transportation commission plans to install multiple speed humps in those neighborhoods.

Which of the following, if true, identifies a potentially serious drawback to the plan for installing speed humps in Ardane?

Boil it down - In order to reduce traffic speed and thereby enhance safety in residential neighborhoods, Ardane's transportation commission plans to install multiple speed humps in those neighborhoods.

C'-- In order to reduce traffic speed/bring traffic speed within the speed limit and thereby enhance safety in residential neighborhoods, Ardane's transportation commission plans to install multiple speed humps in those neighborhoods.
If the conclusion was C' as specified above, will A be valid weakener ? -- Since even with speed humps, the traffic speed will not be within the speed limits .


A. On residential streets without speed humps, many vehicles travel at speeds more than 25 percent above the posted speed limit.

B. Because of their high weight, emergency vehicles such as fire trucks and ambulances must slow almost to a stop at speed humps. -- Correct

mcelroytutoring , AjiteshArun , GMATNinja , mikemcgarry , egmat , sayantanc2k, RonPurewal , DmitryFarber , MagooshExpert , ccooley , ChiranjeevSingh, GMATGuruNY , KarishmaB , other experts-- please enlighten
User avatar
ChiranjeevSingh
Joined: 22 Oct 2012
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 411
Own Kudos:
3,061
 [4]
Given Kudos: 155
Status:Private GMAT Tutor
Location: India
Concentration: Economics, Finance
Schools: IIMA  (A)
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V85 DI85
GMAT Focus 2: 735 Q90 V85 DI85
GMAT Focus 3: 735 Q88 V87 DI84
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V47
GRE 1: Q170 V168
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: IIMA  (A)
GMAT Focus 3: 735 Q88 V87 DI84
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V47
GRE 1: Q170 V168
Posts: 411
Kudos: 3,061
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Skywalker18
Enforcement of local speed limits through police monitoring has proven unsuccessful in the town of Ardane. In many nearby towns, speed humps (raised areas of pavement placed across residential streets, about 300 feet apart) have reduced traffic speeds on residential streets by 20 to 25 percent. In order to reduce traffic speed and thereby enhance safety in residential neighborhoods, Ardane's transportation commission plans to install multiple speed humps in those neighborhoods.

Which of the following, if true, identifies a potentially serious drawback to the plan for installing speed humps in Ardane?

Boil it down - In order to reduce traffic speed and thereby enhance safety in residential neighborhoods, Ardane's transportation commission plans to install multiple speed humps in those neighborhoods.

C'-- In order to reduce traffic speed/bring traffic speed within the speed limit and thereby enhance safety in residential neighborhoods, Ardane's transportation commission plans to install multiple speed humps in those neighborhoods.
If the conclusion was C' as specified above, will A be valid weakener ? -- Since even with speed humps, the traffic speed will not be within the speed limits .


A. On residential streets without speed humps, many vehicles travel at speeds more than 25 percent above the posted speed limit.

B. Because of their high weight, emergency vehicles such as fire trucks and ambulances must slow almost to a stop at speed humps. -- Correct


No. Even with your conclusion, option A will not be weakener. For the following reason:

Let x be the speed limit. If many vehicles drive at 1.25x and we bring down their speed by 20-25%, their new speed will be 0.94x to 1.0x. Thus, their new speed will be within the speed limit.

- Chiranjeev
User avatar
GMATYoda
Joined: 24 Sep 2018
Last visit: 18 Jan 2021
Posts: 103
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 14
Posts: 103
Kudos: 190
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MikunDash
(CR04925)---> If we consider B as the option, won't the emergency vehicles in nearby towns facing similar problems? Why has it lead to a reduction in traffic speeds in those towns?
Dear MikunDash,

I'll try to answer your query. kindly follow.
Read the question stem carefully.

Enforcement of local speed limits through police monitoring has proven unsuccessful in the town of Ardane. In many nearby towns, speed humps (raised areas of pavement placed across residential streets, about 300 feet apart) have reduced traffic speeds on residential streets by 20 to 25 percent. In order to reduce traffic speed and thereby enhance safety in residential neighborhoods, Ardane's transportation commission plans to install multiple speed humps in those neighborhoods.

Quote:
Which of the following, if true, identifies a potentially serious drawback to the plan for installing speed humps in Ardane?

The author wants us to answer with the potential serious drawback to the plan for installing speed humps in ARDANE. Author isn't concerned about the drawbacks in the neighbouring cities. Only concern is Ardane.
I hope this is in itself enough to actually eliminate your query, but if you still need further reinforcement.

The author says that Ardane's transportation commission plans to install multiple speed humps in those neighborhoods.
Multiple jumps off to me from this sentence, may be the neighbouring city didn't install multiple speed humps, hence may be the draw back in the neighbouring city aren't as severe as in Arden.

B. Because of their high weight, emergency vehicles such as fire trucks and ambulances must slow almost to a stop at speed humps.

Quote:
C. The residential speed limit in Ardane is higher than that of the nearby towns where speed humps were installed.
Just addressing C because it is the second most choose answer option. Also to answer adkikani, "if same could be avoided by more precise reading."
Yes, more precise reading may help you eliminate C. As follows:

Even if residential speed limit in Arden is higher than that of the nearby towns where speed humps were installed. This isn't the potential serious drawback of having speed humps in Arden.

If we read the question carefully, the question mentions potentially serious draw back.

Speed limit is already existent, and potential serious drawback is yet to occur.

I hope this helps us eliminate this answer option as a clear non-contender.
avatar
sonkarnishant
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 05 Apr 2020
Last visit: 21 May 2023
Posts: 33
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja please provide why C is not a drawback in the argument ??
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,787
 [5]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,787
 [5]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sonkarnishant
GMATNinja please provide why C is not a drawback in the argument ??
According to the passage, Ardane’s transportation commission develops a plan to install speed humps “in order to reduce traffic speed and thereby enhance safety in residential neighborhoods.” The question asks that we identify a drawback to that plan. Consider (C):

Quote:
(C) The residential speed limit in Ardane is higher than that of the nearby towns where speed humps were installed.
If speed humps effectively reduced traffic speed where speed limits were lower (and drivers were presumably driving slower), then similar speed humps will almost certainly reduce driving speeds where speed limits are higher (and drivers are presumably driving faster). This means that the plan is very likely to achieve its goal of reducing traffic speeds.

(C) would require far too many assumptions and far too much additional information to even hint at a drawback. For example, some may argue that the plan could potentially reduce traffic speeds too much, but we have no information to indicate by how much the speed limit in Ardane differs from that of nearby towns. If the residential speed limit is merely 5 mph higher, then any negative impact on the flow of traffic will likely be negligible. Therefore, (C) does not indicate a drawback, and we can eliminate it.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
errorlogger
Joined: 01 Nov 2020
Last visit: 31 Jan 2022
Posts: 82
Own Kudos:
86
 [1]
Given Kudos: 52
Posts: 82
Kudos: 86
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Our ask is to find a flaw in the plan of installing humps. Why is there a need of installing humps --> To reduce speed & enhance safety.

How on earth does slowing down ambulances and emergency vehicles' indicates a flaw in the plan? Ok, I'll agree that the speed got reduced. What about enhancing safety?

What about bikers? They are failing both the objectives of the plan:
1. No speed is reduced as stated in the passage -- Unaware
2. Safety is at risk.

Even if we assume that the emergency vehicles have the potential to enhance safety. Aren't we assuming way too much?

GMATNinja or any experts, please help.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,787
 [5]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,787
 [5]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
errorlogger
Our ask is to find a flaw in the plan of installing humps. Why is there a need of installing humps --> To reduce speed & enhance safety.

How on earth does slowing down ambulances and emergency vehicles' indicates a flaw in the plan? Ok, I'll agree that the speed got reduced. What about enhancing safety?

What about bikers? They are failing both the objectives of the plan:
1. No speed is reduced as stated in the passage -- Unaware
2. Safety is at risk.

Even if we assume that the emergency vehicles have the potential to enhance safety. Aren't we assuming way too much?

GMATNinja or any experts, please help.
It's important to notice the exact language of the question -- here, we are not asked to find a flaw in the logic of the plan. Instead, we have to identify a "potentially serious drawback" to installing speed humps. (Side note: do people actually call these speed humps? I've always heard speed bumps. :dontknow: )

So we don't specifically need to determine why the humps would not reduce speed or increase safety. We're looking for ANY potential drawback to installing speed humps in the town -- maybe speed humps severely damage the bottoms of cars, or maybe thieves wait in the woods and carjack people who slow down at the speed humps. There doesn't HAVE to be a connection between the "drawback" and the intended goal of installing the speed humps.

With that in mind, consider (B):
Quote:
B. Because of their high weight, emergency vehicles such as fire trucks and ambulances must slow almost to a stop at speed humps.
This is a serious drawback! Emergency vehicles need to move quickly to put out fires and get injured people to the hospital. If the vehicles have to slow down almost to a stop, then the town of Ardane might, on the whole, suffer if the plan to install speed humps is implemented.

(B) identifies a drawback to installing speed humps, so it's the correct answer.

Take another look at (E):
Quote:
E. Bicyclists generally prefer that speed humps be constructed so as to leave a space on the side of the road where bicycles can travel without going over the humps.
(E) tells us about what kind of speed humps would be preferred by bicyclists. But it doesn't tell us that this kind of speed hump will actually be installed. So we really can't conclude that (E) gives us any information that would impact speed or safety.

In addition, even if the speed humps with space on the side ARE installed, (E) still doesn't identify a serious drawback to installing speed humps. Maybe these speed humps are slightly less effective at reducing speed than other speed humps would be, but overall, the speed humps would still be somewhat effective and there isn't really a downside to installing them.

(E) is out because it doesn't identify a serious drawback to installing speed humps.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
Bambi2021
Joined: 13 Mar 2021
Last visit: 23 Dec 2021
Posts: 318
Own Kudos:
136
 [1]
Given Kudos: 226
Posts: 318
Kudos: 136
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This is a big "what?" for me. As if ambulances and firefighters are not driving in the neighbourhoods of nearby cities too? If it worked in nearby cities, why wouldnt it work here?
User avatar
mSKR
Joined: 14 Aug 2019
Last visit: 10 Mar 2024
Posts: 1,290
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 381
Location: Hong Kong
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
GPA: 3.81
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
Posts: 1,290
Kudos: 938
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bambi2021
This is a big "what?" for me. As if ambulances and firefighters are not driving in the neighbourhoods of nearby cities too? If it worked in nearby cities, why wouldnt it work here?


although i choose B , but I had similar doubt on B .
Then i read the question:
Which of the following, if true, identifies a potentially serious drawback to the plan for installing speed humps in Ardane?
it is true that installing these speed humps would bring a disadvantage to emergency vehicles.
But my doubt prevails, what is so different in Ardane as compared to neighborhood towns? No such information is given in the argument that can distinguish it.

VeritasKarishma GMATNinja: Could you please clarify on this thought? Why shall we not bother about comparison?
If we can learn lesson of speed humps can help to reduce speed why not take consider disadvantage of stopping of emergency vehicles in other towns. It's not they may not have these vehicles.

please suggest.
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
77,000
 [4]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 77,000
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Enforcement of local speed limits through police monitoring has proven unsuccessful in the town of Ardane. In many nearby towns, speed humps (raised areas of pavement placed across residential streets, about 300 feet apart) have reduced traffic speeds on residential streets by 20 to 25 percent. In order to reduce traffic speed and thereby enhance safety in residential neighborhoods, Ardane's transportation commission plans to install multiple speed humps in those neighborhoods.

Which of the following, if true, identifies a potentially serious drawback to the plan for installing speed humps in Ardane?


A. On residential streets without speed humps, many vehicles travel at speeds more than 25 percent above the posted speed limit.

B. Because of their high weight, emergency vehicles such as fire trucks and ambulances must slow almost to a stop at speed humps.

C. The residential speed limit in Ardane is higher than that of the nearby towns where speed humps were installed.

D. Motorists who are not familiar with the streets in Ardane's residential districts would be likely to encounter the speed humps unawares unless warned by signs and painted indicators.

E. Bicyclists generally prefer that speed humps be constructed so as to leave a space on the side of the road where bicycles can travel without going over the humps.


NEW question from GMAT® Official Guide 2019


(CR04925)

Check out its video solution here: https://youtu.be/PXjBs1FOhzo


Local speed limits are not being enforced.
In nearby towns, speed humps have reduced traffic speeds by 20-25%.

Plan: Ardane plans to install speed humps in residential neighbourhoods.
Aim: To reduce traffic speed and thereby enhance safety in residential neighbourhoods

Which of the following, if true, identifies a potentially serious drawback to the plan?

A. On residential streets without speed humps, many vehicles travel at speeds more than 25 percent above the posted speed limit.

This point is in favour of installing speed humps.

B. Because of their high weight, emergency vehicles such as fire trucks and ambulances must slow almost to a stop at speed humps.

This identifies a serious drawback to the plan and needs to be addressed. The aim is to improve the safety of residents. If emergency response vehicles will face a problem because of speed humps, it is a potential drawback. Other towns have speed humps does not mean that this was not identified and addressed by them (e.g. making side roads for emergency vehicles etc). Also, perhaps other towns had other aims. Safety may not have been priority - we don't know. The point is - just because something exists somewhere else and does what it is supposed to, doesn't mean it does not come with its own problems which need to be mitigated.
Note that we are looking for an option that identifies a serious drawback. The plan may reduce speed limit in the area but what problem does it come with?
Pay special attention to the way your question stem is worded.

C. The residential speed limit in Ardane is higher than that of the nearby towns where speed humps were installed.

Irrelevant.

D. Motorists who are not familiar with the streets in Ardane's residential districts would be likely to encounter the speed humps unawares unless warned by signs and painted indicators.

We don't know whether speed humps are made with signs and indicators or without. So we don't have enough information to say whether this is a potential drawback.

E. Bicyclists generally prefer that speed humps be constructed so as to leave a space on the side of the road where bicycles can travel without going over the humps.

What bicyclists prefer is irrelevant.

Answer (B)
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,787
 [2]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,787
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mSKR
Bambi2021
This is a big "what?" for me. As if ambulances and firefighters are not driving in the neighbourhoods of nearby cities too? If it worked in nearby cities, why wouldnt it work here?


although i choose B , but I had similar doubt on B .
Then i read the question:
Which of the following, if true, identifies a potentially serious drawback to the plan for installing speed humps in Ardane?
it is true that installing these speed humps would bring a disadvantage to emergency vehicles.
But my doubt prevails, what is so different in Ardane as compared to neighborhood towns? No such information is given in the argument that can distinguish it.

VeritasKarishma GMATNinja: Could you please clarify on this thought? Why shall we not bother about comparison?
If we can learn lesson of speed humps can help to reduce speed why not take consider disadvantage of stopping of emergency vehicles in other towns. It's not they may not have these vehicles.

please suggest.
The question asks us to find a potentially serious drawback. As explained in this post, (B) does exactly that!

As for the nearby towns: all we know about these towns is that they installed the speed humps and successfully reduced the speed of traffic in residential areas. Perhaps they didn't think about the issue with the emergency vehicles, and they deeply regret installing the humps. Or perhaps they did know about the issue with the emergency vehicles, and decided that despite this serious drawback, it was still worth it to install the humps. Or perhaps they have lighter emergency vehicles, and this isn't an issue at all! We have no idea, and honestly the answer is irrelevant. (B) gives us a potentially serious drawback to installing the humps in Ardane, so (B) is the correct answer.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
woohoo921
Joined: 04 Jun 2020
Last visit: 17 Mar 2023
Posts: 516
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 623
Posts: 516
Kudos: 142
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I realize that the question asks for a "potentially serious drawback to the plan for installing speed humps." To clarify, does the drawback that we need to identify have to directly attack the reason behind why the commission wants to install the speed humps to 1. reduce traffic speed or 2. enhance safety.

Or theoretically could you have identified a more general reason as to why there are significant drawbacks to speed humps (e.g., they are super expensive)?

The question "a potentially serious drawback to the plan" is vague, but I realize on critical reasoning questions that you normally need to attack the logic/the correct answer does this by tackling one of the issues for the speed humps --> safety.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,787
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,787
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
woohoo921
I realize that the question asks for a "potentially serious drawback to the plan for installing speed humps." To clarify, does the drawback that we need to identify have to directly attack the reason behind why the commission wants to install the speed humps to 1. reduce traffic speed or 2. enhance safety.

Or theoretically could you have identified a more general reason as to why there are significant drawbacks to speed humps (e.g., they are super expensive)?

The question "a potentially serious drawback to the plan" is vague, but I realize on critical reasoning questions that you normally need to attack the logic/the correct answer does this by tackling one of the issues for the speed humps --> safety.
As we explained in this post, we're looking for ANY serious drawback to the speed humps. That drawback might directly relate to the commission's reasons for wanting the humps, or might not.

You really can't generalize about all CR questions -- you just have to take each one as it comes. Other CR questions might ask you to undermine (or strengthen, etc) an argument, and that could involve weakening the author's chain of logic.

This question doesn't ask you to do that, and there's no "rule" that you have to undermine the commission's reasoning. You just have to find a drawback to the speed humps, which is provided in option (B).

I hope that helps!
 1   2   3   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts