Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
In Episode 7 of our GMAT Ninja CR series, we are rounding up the oddballs, the misfits, and the format-benders: EXCEPT, Fill-In-The-Blanks, and other unusual Critical Reasoning question types. When you see a question that ends with a literal blank line
For most test takers, Data Insights is the most challenging section on the GMAT, with test takers scoring several points lower on average on DI than on Quant or Verbal and completing the section with less time to spare.
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight Fair – the world’s premier event for serious MBA candidates. This is your chance to hear directly from Admissions Directors at nearly every Top 30 MBA program..
Ethicist: Robert Gillette has argued that because a thorough knowledge of genetics would enable us to cure the over 3,000 inherited disorders that affect humanity, deciphering the human genetic code will certainly benefit humanity despite its enormous cost. Gillette's argument is not persuasive, however, because he fails to consider that such knowledge might ultimately harm human beings more than it would benefit them.
Which one of the following most accurately expresses the conclusion of the ethicist's argument?
A. Gillette's argument wrongly assumes that deciphering the genetic code will lead to cures for genetic disorders. B. Deciphering the genetic code might ultimately harm human beings more than benefit them. C. Because of its possible negative consequences, genetic research should not be conducted. D. Gillette's claim that a thorough knowledge of genetics would enable us to cure over 3,000 disorders is overstated. E. Gillette's argument is unconvincing because it ignores certain possible consequences of genetic research.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Ethicist: Robert Gillette has argued that because a thorough knowledge of genetics would enable us to cure the over 3,000 inherited disorders that affect humanity, deciphering the human genetic code will certainly benefit humanity despite its enormous cost. Gillette's argument is not persuasive, however, because he fails to consider that such knowledge might ultimately harm human beings more than it would benefit them.
Which one of the following most accurately expresses the conclusion of the ethicist's argument?
A. Gillette's argument wrongly assumes that deciphering the genetic code will lead to cures for genetic disorders. B. Deciphering the genetic code might ultimately harm human beings more than benefit them. C. Because of its possible negative consequences, genetic research should not be conducted. D. Gillette's claim that a thorough knowledge of genetics would enable us to cure over 3,000 disorders is overstated. E. Gillette's argument is unconvincing because it ignores certain possible consequences of genetic research.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.