Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
75%
(hard)
Question Stats:
48%
(01:40)
correct 52%
(01:53)
wrong
based on 25
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Ethicist: Robert Gillette has argued that because a thorough knowledge of genetics would enable us to cure the over 3,000 inherited disorders that affect humanity, deciphering the human genetic code will certainly benefit humanity despite its enormous cost. Gillette's argument is not persuasive, however, because he fails to consider that such knowledge might ultimately harm human beings more than it would benefit them.
Which one of the following most accurately expresses the conclusion of the ethicist's argument?
A. Gillette's argument wrongly assumes that deciphering the genetic code will lead to cures for genetic disorders. B. Deciphering the genetic code might ultimately harm human beings more than benefit them. C. Because of its possible negative consequences, genetic research should not be conducted. D. Gillette's claim that a thorough knowledge of genetics would enable us to cure over 3,000 disorders is overstated. E. Gillette's argument is unconvincing because it ignores certain possible consequences of genetic research.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Ethicist: Robert Gillette has argued that because a thorough knowledge of genetics would enable us to cure the over 3,000 inherited disorders that affect humanity, deciphering the human genetic code will certainly benefit humanity despite its enormous cost. Gillette's argument is not persuasive, however, because he fails to consider that such knowledge might ultimately harm human beings more than it would benefit them.
Which one of the following most accurately expresses the conclusion of the ethicist's argument?
A. Gillette's argument wrongly assumes that deciphering the genetic code will lead to cures for genetic disorders. B. Deciphering the genetic code might ultimately harm human beings more than benefit them. C. Because of its possible negative consequences, genetic research should not be conducted. D. Gillette's claim that a thorough knowledge of genetics would enable us to cure over 3,000 disorders is overstated. E. Gillette's argument is unconvincing because it ignores certain possible consequences of genetic research.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.