Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 07:07 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 07:07
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Spectre26
Joined: 20 May 2023
Last visit: 19 Jun 2025
Posts: 104
Own Kudos:
127
 [1]
Given Kudos: 82
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q85 V81 DI79
GPA: 8.5/10
WE:Project Management (Manufacturing)
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q85 V81 DI79
Posts: 104
Kudos: 127
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ready01
Joined: 20 Aug 2023
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 4
Given Kudos: 795
Posts: 4
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
dhwanit2412
Joined: 24 Feb 2024
Last visit: 13 Feb 2025
Posts: 28
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 74
Posts: 28
Kudos: 16
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,389
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,389
Kudos: 778,236
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Spectre26
­Ethicist: Robert Gillette has argued that because a thorough knowledge of genetics would enable us to cure the over 3,000 inherited disorders that affect humanity, deciphering the human genetic code will certainly benefit humanity despite its enormous cost. Gillette's argument is not persuasive, however, because he fails to consider that such knowledge might ultimately harm human beings more than it would benefit them.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the conclusion of the ethicist's argument?

A. Gillette's argument wrongly assumes that deciphering the genetic code will lead to cures for genetic disorders.
B. Deciphering the genetic code might ultimately harm human beings more than benefit them.
C. Because of its possible negative consequences, genetic research should not be conducted.
D. Gillette's claim that a thorough knowledge of genetics would enable us to cure over 3,000 disorders is overstated.
E. Gillette's argument is unconvincing because it ignores certain possible consequences of genetic research.­
­This question is discussed here:

https://gmatclub.com/forum/ethicist-rob ... 67985.html

Hope this helps.

Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
188 posts