GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 17 Jan 2019, 16:08

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions in January
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
303112345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
Open Detailed Calendar
  • The winning strategy for a high GRE score

     January 17, 2019

     January 17, 2019

     08:00 AM PST

     09:00 AM PST

    Learn the winning strategy for a high GRE score — what do people who reach a high score do differently? We're going to share insights, tips and strategies from data we've collected from over 50,000 students who used examPAL.
  • Free GMAT Strategy Webinar

     January 19, 2019

     January 19, 2019

     07:00 AM PST

     09:00 AM PST

    Aiming to score 760+? Attend this FREE session to learn how to Define your GMAT Strategy, Create your Study Plan and Master the Core Skills to excel on the GMAT.

Every element on the periodic chart is radioactive, though

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

 
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 27 Mar 2012
Posts: 12
Every element on the periodic chart is radioactive, though  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jul 2012, 20:31
1
2
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

64% (01:16) correct 36% (01:20) wrong based on 139 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Every element on the periodic chart is radioactive, though the most stable elements have half-lives that are thousands and thousands of years long. When an atom decays, it splits into two or more smaller atoms. Even considering the fusion taking place inside of stars, there is only a negligible tendency for smaller atoms to transmute into larger ones. Thus, the ratio of lighter to heavier atoms in the universe is increasing at a measurable rate. Therefore, __________________________.

Which of the following most logically completes the above statements?
1) it is possible to use a shifting ratio of light to heavy atoms to calculate the age of the universe.
2) the fusion taking place inside stars has to produce enough atoms of the heavy elements to offset the radioactive decay of large atoms elsewhere in the universe.
3) without radioactive decay of atoms, there could be no solar combustion and no life as we know it.
4) it is imperative that scientists begin developing ways to reverse the trend and restore the proper balance between the lighter and the heavier elements.
5) there are now more light elements in the universe than heavy ones.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 12 Jun 2011
Posts: 2
Re: Every element on the periodic chart is radioactive  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jul 2012, 22:21
1 is correct, The last statement indicates that the ratio is increasing and it is measurable. The initial statement gives background on atoms, decay rate & half life indicating various factors for determining age of universe.
Retired Moderator
avatar
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 578
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Every element on the periodic chart is radioactive  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jul 2012, 08:55
gjg wrote:
Every element on the periodic chart is radioactive, though the most stable elements have half-lives that are thousands and thousands of years long. When an atom decays, it splits into two or more smaller atoms. Even considering the fusion taking place inside of stars, there is only a negligible tendency for smaller atoms to transmute into larger ones. Thus, the ratio of lighter to heavier atoms in the universe is increasing at a measurable rate. Therefore, __________________________.

2) the fusion taking place inside stars has to produce enough atoms of the heavy elements to offset the radioactive decay of large atoms elsewhere in the universe.
3) without radioactive decay of atoms, there could be no solar combustion and no life as we know it.
4) it is imperative that scientists begin developing ways to reverse the trend and restore the proper balance between the lighter and the heavier elements.
5) there are now more light elements in the universe than heavy ones.


I liked this one because It took me quite long time to guest the meaning of the argument. However, my choice is the first one, choice (A). My reasoning is:
(A) it is possible to use a shifting ratio of light to heavy atoms to calculate the age of the universe. => the cause the ratio of lighter to heavier atom in the universe is increasing at a MEASURABLE RATE (this is the keyword for all of this argument) => We can measure the speed of decaying => can calculate the time
(B) HAS TO in this choice is very extreme. And the argument also did not mention the offset between various kind of elements
(C) SOLAR COMBUSTION is irrelevant to the argument
(D) IMPERATIVE is also a extreme word. So, out of scope
(E) This hypothesis that there are now more light elements in the universe than heavy ones is really non-provable because there is no clue in the argument.
_________________

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 10 May 2012
Posts: 43
GMAT Date: 09-10-2012
Re: Every element on the periodic chart is radioactive  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jul 2012, 10:37
Dont understand why cant E be the answer!

what is the OA and OE?
Current Student
User avatar
B
Joined: 11 May 2011
Posts: 321
Re: Every element on the periodic chart is radioactive  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jul 2012, 20:58
My Answer is A.
1) it is possible to use a shifting ratio of light to heavy atoms to calculate the age of the universe.

Whats OA?
_________________

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What you do TODAY is important because you're exchanging a day of your life for it!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 04 Mar 2008
Posts: 37
Re: Every element on the periodic chart is radioactive  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jul 2012, 23:06
jaiswalamrita wrote:
Dont understand why cant E be the answer!

what is the OA and OE?



For E to be the conclusion, the proportion of lighter to higher needs to be discussed. which is not the case.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 May 2010
Posts: 167
Re: Every element on the periodic chart is radioactive, though  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Aug 2012, 18:40
Every element on the periodic chart is radioactive, though the most stable elements have half-lives that are thousands and thousands of years long. When an atom decays, it splits into two or more smaller atoms. Even considering the fusion taking place inside of stars, there is only a negligible tendency for smaller atoms to transmute into larger ones. Thus, the ratio of lighter to heavier atoms in the universe is increasing at a measurable rate. Therefore, __________________________.

Which of the following most logically completes the above statements?

2) the fusion taking place inside stars has to produce enough atoms of the heavy elements to offset the radioactive decay of large atoms elsewhere in the universe.

Went with 2. Can someone give an explanation. I though the negligible tendency for smaller atoms to transmute into larger ones paralleled 2.
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 12 Feb 2012
Posts: 26
Location: United States
GMAT Date: 08-30-2012
Re: Every element on the periodic chart is radioactive, though  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Aug 2012, 23:50
Except B & E , other options are just far away from the ans.
I was eliminated E because it says " there are now more light elements in the universe than heavy ones." .It might be true , But we dont know the current conditions ...so it seems difficult to conclude .....
So ,I would go with B
BTW what is the OA ????
_________________

KUMAR GAURAB
GET MAD ABOUT TEST

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 21 Aug 2012
Posts: 18
Re: Every element on the periodic chart is radioactive, though  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Aug 2012, 02:03
grbjha wrote:
Except B & E , other options are just far away from the ans.
I was eliminated E because it says " there are now more light elements in the universe than heavy ones." .It might be true , But we dont know the current conditions ...so it seems difficult to conclude .....
So ,I would go with B
BTW what is the OA ????


Per me the answer is A. Ruling B out as there is no mention in the passage about requirement to offset the increase in ratio of lighter atoms. On the otherhand Passage does mention that Shift towards lighter atoms is mesureable hence A makes a better choice.
_________________

Please give kudos if you like my reply!

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Mar 2010
Posts: 337
Re: Every element on the periodic chart is radioactive, though  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Aug 2012, 20:09
Answer choice is A.

B makes a normative statement that is not supported by the stimulus. Nowhere does it say that fusion within stars NEEDS to offset radioactive decay elsewhere.

E is NOT the answer because the question stimulus says that the RATIO of light to heavy atoms is increasing at a measurable rate. However, that tells us nothing about the ABSOLUTE number of light atoms in the universe vs. heavy. For instance, let's say that a million years ago there was 1 billion light atoms and 10 billion heavy atoms, for a ratio of 1:10. Now, there is 5 billion light atoms and 6 billion heavy atoms, for a ratio of 5:6. The ratio has certainly increased a lot, but there is still more heavy atoms. So we cannot conclude based on the information given that E holds true. This is the classic ratio vs raw number trick that the GMAT loves to pull.

A is correct because it makes the correct conclusion based on the information given. If the ratio of light to heavy atoms is increasing at MEASURABLE (key word for this question) rate, then we can mathematically figure out the age of the universe since this fusion process has been going on since the beginning of the universe.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 06 Jul 2012
Posts: 32
Re: Every element on the periodic chart is radioactive, though  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Aug 2012, 22:57
I'l go with A.

The choice gives relation between 2 premises - half lives and ratios of lighter to heavier atoms.
Knowing these 2 and we can calculate the speed with which the division of an heavier atom to lighter atom is going on, and thus the life of universe when compared with the actual life of undivided atom, can be calculated.

regards
_________________

If you think you are lost, you are.

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 07 Feb 2008
Posts: 49
Location: United States
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Re: Every element on the periodic chart is radioactive, though  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Aug 2012, 01:32
My answer is A

keywords are "increasing at a measurable rate"

so, increasing rate = shifting ratio can be used to determine the age of the universe
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2012
Posts: 13
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GPA: 3.5
Re: Every element on the periodic chart is radioactive, though  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Aug 2012, 08:20
OA is A

every-element-on-the-periodic-chart-is-radioactive-although-74688.html
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: exam is close ... dont know if i ll hit that number
Joined: 06 Jun 2011
Posts: 144
Location: India
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
GMAT Date: 10-09-2012
GPA: 3.2
Re: Every element on the periodic chart is radioactive, though  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Aug 2012, 10:15
good question ..
i missed it
but now i understand how it works ..whenever we digress from the conclusion the chances of missing the question are very high
_________________

just one more month for exam...

Board of Directors
User avatar
P
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3283
Re: Every element on the periodic chart is radioactive, though  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Aug 2012, 11:12
mohan514 wrote:
good question ..
i missed it
but now i understand how it works ..whenever we digress from the conclusion the chances of missing the question are very high


Even though I do not like LSAT question because they do not resemble real GMAT questions, I like this one.

In complete the argument whenever you see SINCE or BECAUSE at the end of the stimulus is a strenghtening or assumption question, but in other cases you have to weakening or find the paradox or conclusion.......in sum, you have to rely on the context of the same and then evaluate your response accordingly.

2) the fusion taking place inside stars has to produce enough atoms of the heavy elements to offset the radioactive decay of large atoms elsewhere in the universe. here is not the point

3) without radioactive decay of atoms, there could be no solar combustion and no life as we know it. once againg, here is not the point at end

4) it is imperative that scientists begin developing ways to reverse the trend and restore the proper balance between the lighter and the heavier elements. too extreme and also wrong because we are not concerned to reverse any trend

5) there are now more light elements in the universe than heavy ones. we can't infer this because we are talking about of ratio

1) it is possible to use a shifting ratio of light to heavy atoms to calculate the age of the universe. looking at the stimulus we have "Every element on the periodic chart is radioactive, though the most stable elements have half-lives that are thousands and thousands of years long" and "the ratio of lighter to heavier atoms in the universe is increasing at a measurable rate."......so a shifting

;)
_________________

COLLECTION OF QUESTIONS AND RESOURCES
Quant: 1. ALL GMATPrep questions Quant/Verbal 2. Bunuel Signature Collection - The Next Generation 3. Bunuel Signature Collection ALL-IN-ONE WITH SOLUTIONS 4. Veritas Prep Blog PDF Version 5. MGMAT Study Hall Thursdays with Ron Quant Videos
Verbal:1. Verbal question bank and directories by Carcass 2. MGMAT Study Hall Thursdays with Ron Verbal Videos 3. Critical Reasoning_Oldy but goldy question banks 4. Sentence Correction_Oldy but goldy question banks 5. Reading-comprehension_Oldy but goldy question banks

Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 3582
Premium Member
Re: Every element on the periodic chart is radioactive, though  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Jan 2019, 18:55
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

-
April 2018: New Forum dedicated to Verbal Strategies, Guides, and Resources

GMAT Club Bot
Re: Every element on the periodic chart is radioactive, though &nbs [#permalink] 09 Jan 2019, 18:55
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Every element on the periodic chart is radioactive, though

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.