It is currently 21 Apr 2018, 14:08

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Every photograph, because it involves the light rays that

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

1 KUDOS received
Senior CR Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: Long way to go!
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Posts: 1368
Location: Viet Nam
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Every photograph, because it involves the light rays that [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Sep 2017, 03:06
1
This post received
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  65% (hard)

Question Stats:

55% (01:50) correct 45% (01:24) wrong based on 253 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Every photograph, because it involves the light rays that something emits hitting film, must in some obvious sense be true. But because it could always have been made to show things differently than it does, it cannot express the whole truth and, in that sense, is false. Therefore, nothing can ever be definitively proved with a photograph.

Which one of the following is an assumption that would permit the conclusion above to be properly drawn?

(A) Whatever is false in the sense that it cannot express the whole truth cannot furnish definitive proof.
(B) The whole truth cannot be known.
(C) It is not possible to determine the truthfulness of a photograph in any sense.
(D) It is possible to use a photograph as corroborative evidence if there is additional evidence establishing the truth about the scene photographed.
(E) If something is being photographed, then it is possible to prove definitively the truth about it.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Actual LSAT CR bank by Broall

How to solve quadratic equations - Factor quadratic equations
Factor table with sign: The useful tool to solve polynomial inequalities
Applying AM-GM inequality into finding extreme/absolute value

New Error Log with Timer

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Posts: 12
Re: Every photograph, because it involves the light rays that [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Sep 2017, 03:01
I selected the answer as C which appears to be wrong. Can someone tell how?

Applying negation on option C: It is possible to determine the truthfulness of a photograph in any sense. which breaks the conclusion. Hence shouldnt C be right?
Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Posts: 168
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GPA: 3.32
Reviews Badge
Re: Every photograph, because it involves the light rays that [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Oct 2017, 05:17
Sanjeetgujrall wrote:
I selected the answer as C which appears to be wrong. Can someone tell how?

Applying negation on option C: It is possible to determine the truthfulness of a photograph in any sense. which breaks the conclusion. Hence shouldnt C be right?


Hi Sanjeetgujrall,

Let's analyze the question:

Every photograph, because it involves the light rays that something emits hitting film, must in some obvious sense be true. But because it could always have been made to show things differently than it does, it cannot express the whole truth and, in that sense, is false. Therefore, nothing can ever be definitively proved with a photograph.

Our conclusion is in dark blue, while our premise is in light blue. I think this is where you became confused. (C) talks about the premise, its truthfulness, but doesn't talk about how we can use the photo as proof. Does truthfulness = definitive proof? No. (A) does this. This is an assumption question, and you are correct to negate.
Here is a link to some more detailed explanations if this isn't clear: https://www.manhattanprep.com/lsat/foru ... t1310.html

Which one of the following is an assumption that would permit the conclusion above to be properly drawn?

(A) Whatever is false in the sense that it cannot express the whole truth cannot furnish definitive proof.
(C) It is not possible to determine the truthfulness of a photograph in any sense.

Does this help?
_________________

D-Day: November 18th, 2017

Director
Director
User avatar
D
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 989
Re: Every photograph, because it involves the light rays that [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Oct 2017, 18:16
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Every photograph, because it involves the light rays that something emits hitting film, must in some obvious sense be true. But because it could always have been made to show things differently than it does, it cannot express the whole truth and, in that sense, is false. Therefore, nothing can ever be definitively proved with a photograph.

Which one of the following is an assumption that would permit the conclusion above to be properly drawn?

(A) Whatever is false in the sense that it cannot express the whole truth cannot furnish definitive proof. -Correct. The argument states that since the photograph can't express the complete truth, thus, it is false. Since it is false, we can't definitely prove anything. Similarly this option states that whatever is false cannot be used to prove anything. This matches the argument word by word
(B) The whole truth cannot be known. -Irrelevant. We are worried about whether the photograph can explain the complete truth
(C) It is not possible to determine the truthfulness of a photograph in any sense. -In the argument we are talking about the truthfulness of an object and NOT the photograph. Thus this option reverses the causality
(D) It is possible to use a photograph as corroborative evidence if there is additional evidence establishing the truth about the scene photographed. -Okay. This is a mere fact which is irrelevant with respect to the argument at hand
(E) If something is being photographed, then it is possible to prove definitively the truth about it. -Irrelevant
_________________

Kudos if my post helps!

Long And A Fruitful Journey - V21 to V41; If I can, So Can You!!


My study resources:
1. Useful Formulae, Concepts and Tricks-Quant
2. e-GMAT's ALL SC Compilation
3. LSAT RC compilation
4. Actual LSAT CR collection by Broal
5. QOTD RC (Carcass)
6. Challange OG RC
7. GMAT Prep Challenge RC

Re: Every photograph, because it involves the light rays that   [#permalink] 10 Oct 2017, 18:16
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Every photograph, because it involves the light rays that

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.