Hi Devzzz,Your instinct is sharp, and you've actually spotted the exact wrinkle that makes (B) tricky. You're right that the documents only cover his
early career. The key is realizing that's all we need.
Go back to how the stimulus frames the puzzle. There are only
two possible patterns, and each one describes his
entire30-year career:
-
Simultaneous - he was a traveling administrator serving
all four magistrates
throughout, living part of each year in each city.
-
Sequential - he served
one magistrate for several years, then left to join the next.
Notice what this means: the question is asking which of these
twocareer-long patterns he followed. It assumes he followed
one of them consistently - not that he switched styles halfway through. (That's the point KarishmaB made: if he served one magistrate early and multiple later, the question wouldn't make sense.)
So take any single slice of time - his early career works perfectly:
- If those early documents involve
only one magistrate - he was fixed in one place -
sequential.
- If they involve
several/all four at once - he was juggling all of them -
simultaneous.
One period settles it, because the pattern is the same across the whole career.
A quick stand-in to feel it: Imagine a worker who either (a) visits
four offices every single week, or (b) works at
one office for years, then moves on. You only need to watch
one week.
Four cities that week? Pattern (a).
One city? Pattern (b). You don't need the whole career - just one honest sample.
That's exactly what (B) gives you.
Answer: BDevzzz
My only problem with option B is, it is specifically telling EARLY ON FROM HIS CAREER. So the docs would only tell about his early career while he has served 4 people in 30 years.. I would have chosen it had it not been for the EARLY ON FROM HIS CAREER part. Can I please get more clarity on this?