Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 18:42 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 18:42
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,374
 [10]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
azhrhasan
Joined: 13 Apr 2019
Last visit: 13 Sep 2024
Posts: 121
Own Kudos:
165
 [3]
Given Kudos: 93
Location: Canada
Concentration: Marketing, Operations
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
GPA: 3.5
WE:General Management (Retail: E-commerce)
Products:
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
Posts: 121
Kudos: 165
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
colinlin1
Joined: 05 Mar 2018
Last visit: 25 Oct 2021
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 19
Posts: 15
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Kosukefev
Joined: 06 May 2022
Last visit: 10 Sep 2022
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi experts,

Why is A wrong?
Since G said "we would irresponsively sacrifice the human lives that could have been saved by the drugs," I thought it is unreasonable to test cosmetics, which do not save human lives, on animals.

Thanks in advance!
avatar
jim441
Joined: 29 Apr 2022
Last visit: 14 Dec 2023
Posts: 193
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 276
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V35 (Online)
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V35 (Online)
Posts: 193
Kudos: 51
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Kosukefev
Hi experts,

Why is A wrong?
Since G said "we would irresponsively sacrifice the human lives that could have been saved by the drugs," I thought it is unreasonable to test cosmetics, which do not save human lives, on animals.

Thanks in advance!


I have the same doubt. GMATNinja can you helpp us here!@
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,787
 [2]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,787
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jim441
Kosukefev
Hi experts,

Why is A wrong?
Since G said "we would irresponsively sacrifice the human lives that could have been saved by the drugs," I thought it is unreasonable to test cosmetics, which do not save human lives, on animals.

Thanks in advance!


I have the same doubt. GMATNinja can you helpp us here!@
This one is a bit convoluted, so it's important to really understand the exact positions that F and G are arguing and the exact question that we have to answer.

To start with the question itself: we're asked which answer choice "is the best objection that could be made from F's point of view to counter G's point." In other words, if F and G continue their discussion, what can F say to defeat G's argument?

Here's a breakdown of F and G's positions:

  • F concludes that "we ought not to test the safety of new drugs on sentient animals." He/she supports this conclusion by saying that animal testing causes the animals pain.
  • G concludes that "we must carry out such tests." His/her support is that "otherwise, we would irresponsibly sacrifice the human lives that could have been saved by the drugs."

Notice here that G assumes that there is no way to get life-saving drugs to humans unless the drugs are tested on sentient animals. G thinks, "No animal testing? Then no life-saving drugs."

How could F defeat this argument? Look at (E) first:
Quote:
(E) Many tests now performed on sentient animals can be performed equally well on fertilized chicken eggs that are at a very early stage of development.
This is a beautiful counterpoint to G's argument. If F said this, he/she would expose the faulty assumption that G made. It IS possible to save human lives without testing on sentient animals.

(E) is a good objection to G's point, so keep (E).

Compare that to (A):
Quote:
(A) Even though it is not necessary for people to use cosmetics, cosmetics are also being tested on sentient animals.
G doesn't care about drugs that are not necessary for people to use. He/she only cares about drugs that could potentially save human life. So, answer choice (A) doesn't raise an objection to G's argument -- in fact, G might well agree that it's wrong to test cosmetics on sentient animals! We simply don't know.

We DO know that G cares deeply about life-saving drugs. This answer choice doesn't offer a rebuttal for G's argument concerning these drugs. If F said the info in (A), it would not effectively defeat G's argument that testing certain drugs on sentient animals is necessary for saving human lives.

Eliminate (A).

I hope that helps!
avatar
bronaugust
Joined: 06 Jun 2024
Last visit: 29 Aug 2024
Posts: 233
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 33
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 233
Kudos: 315
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
Quote:
­F: We ought not to test the safety of new drugs on sentient animals, such as dogs and rabbits. Our benefit means their pain, and they are equal to us in the capacity to feel pain.

G: We must carry out such tests; otherwise, we would irresponsibly sacrifice the human lives that could have been saved by the drugs.

Which of the following, if true, is the best objection that could be made from F's point of view to counter G's point?


(A) Even though it is not necessary for people to use cosmetics, cosmetics are also being tested on sentient animals.

(B) Medical science already has at its disposal a great number of drugs and other treatments for serious illnesses.

(C) It is not possible to obtain scientifically adequate results by testing drugs in the test tube, without making tests on living tissue.

(D) Some of the drugs to be tested would save human beings from great pain.

(E) Many tests now performed on sentient animals can be performed equally well on fertilized chicken eggs that are at a very early stage of development.
The examiner wants you as a solver to choose the option that happens to be the best objection F could make to counter the point made by G. Now that you have understood what the examiner wants out of you, you may read and understand the views shared by F and G. F's main point is that it is not right to test the safety of new drugs on sentient animals. The word 'sentient' is crucial. F is not opposed to the idea of testing the safety of new drugs on animals, but F does not want it to be tested on animals that can feel pain, that is on animals that are sentient. G, on the other hand, says that such tests must be carried out to prevent the irresponsible sacrifice of human lives that could have been saved by the drugs. The right answer, clearly an objection that F could make to counter G's point, must introduce a situation that says it is possible to test the safety of new drugs without actually subjecting sentient animals to pain. Now, you shall eliminate the answer options that are either out of scope or too extreme. 

(A) Even though it is not necessary for people to use cosmetics, cosmetics are also being tested on sentient animals. - OUT OF SCOPE - Not worried about cosmeticsELIMINATE

(B) Medical science already has at its disposal a great number of drugs and other treatments for serious illnesses. - OUT OF SCOPE - Not worried about what medical science has at its disposal for serious illnesses - ELIMINATE

(C) It is not possible to obtain scientifically adequate results by testing drugs in the test tube, without making tests on living tissue. - OUT OF SCOPE - Not worried about whether or not it is possible to obtain scientifically adequate results by testing drugs in the test tube ELIMINATE

(D) Some of the drugs to be tested would save human beings from great pain. - OUT OF SCOPE - Not worried about SOME of the drugs to be tested - ELIMINATE

(E) Many tests now performed on sentient animals can be performed equally well on fertilized chicken eggs that are at a very early stage of development. - CLEARLY INTRODUCES A SITUATION THAT SAYS IT IS POSSIBLE TO TEST THE SAFETY OF NEW DRUGS ON ANIMALS THAT ARE NOT SENTIENT - No reason to eliminate - MARK AND MOVE

Without a shadow of a doubt, E is the right answer.  ­
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,830
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,830
Kudos: 986
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts