New Project RC Butler 2019 - Practice 2 RC Passages Everyday Passage # 213, Date : 18-Jul-2019 This post is a part of New Project RC Butler 2019 . Click here for Details Faced with the problems of insufficient evidence, of conflicting evidence, and of evidence relayed through the flawed perceptual, retentive, and narrative abilities of witnesses, a jury is forced to draw inferences in its attempt to ascertain the truth. By applying the same cognitive tools they have developed and used over a lifetime, jurors engage in the inferential exercise that lawyers call fact-finding. In certain decision-making contexts that are relevant to the trial of lawsuits, however, these normally reliable cognitive tools may cause jurors to commit inferential errors that distort rather than reveal the truth. Although juries can make a variety of inferential errors, most of these mistakes in judgment involve the drawing of an unwarranted conclusion from the evidence, that is, in reality, it does not prove. For example, evidence that the defendant in a criminal prosecution has a prior conviction may encourage jurors to presume the defendant’s guilt, because of their preconception that a person previously convicted of a crime must be inclined toward repeated criminal behavior. That commonly held belief is at least a partial distortion of reality; not all former convicts engage in repeated criminal behavior. Also, a jury may give more probative weight than objective analysis would allow to vivid photographic evidence depicting a shooting victim’s wounds, or may underestimate the weight of defense testimony that is not delivered in a sufficiently forceful or persuasive manner. Finally, complex or voluminous evidence might be so confusing to a jury that its members would draw totally unwarranted conclusions or even ignore the evidence entirely. Recent empirical research in cognitive psychology suggests that people tend to commit inferential errors like these under certain predictable circumstances. By examining the available information, the situation, and the type of decision being made, cognitive psychologists can describe the kinds of inferential errors a person or a group is likely to make. These patterns of human decision-making may provide the courts with a guide to evaluating the effect of evidence on the reliability of the jury’s inferential processes in certain situations. The fact that juries can commit inferential errors that jeopardize the accuracy of the fact-finding process is not unknown to the courts. In fact, one of a presiding judge’s duties is to minimize jury inferential error through explanation and clarification. Nonetheless, most judges now employ only a limited and primitive concept of jury inferential error: limited because it fails to recognize the potential for errors outside certain traditional situations, primitive because it ignores the research and conclusions of psychologists in favor of notions about human cognition held by lawyers. 1 A 1 . Which of the following best explains the main idea of the passage? (A). When making decisions in certain predictable situations, juries may commit inferential errors that obscure rather than reveal the truth. (B). The views of human cognition held by psychologists on the one hand and by the legal profession are demonstrably dissimilar. (C). When confronting powerful preconceptions, particularly shocking evidence, or complex situations, jurors make errors in judgment. (D). The problem of inferential error by juries is typical of the difficulties with cognitive processes that people face in their everyday lives. (E). Juries would probably make more reliable decisions if cognitive psychologists, rather than judges, instructed them about the problems inherent in drawing unwarranted conclusions. 2 D 2. Of the following hypothetical reforms in trial procedure, which one would the author be most likely to support as the best way to address the problem of jury inferential error? (A) a move away from jury trials (B) the institution of minimum formal educational requirements for jurors (C) the development of strict guidelines for defense testimony (D) specific training for judges in the area of jury instruction (E) restrictions on lawyers’ use of psychological research 3 D 3. In the second paragraph, the author’s primary purpose is to (A) refute the idea that the fact-finding process is a complicated exercise (B) emphasize how carefully evidence must be presented in order to avoid jury inferential error (C) explain how commonly held beliefs affect the Jury’s ability to ascertain the truth (D) provide examples of situations that may precipitate jury errors (E) recommend a method for minimizing mistakes by juries 4 C 4. Which one of the following best describes the author’s attitude toward the majority of judges today? (A) apprehensive about whether they are consistent in their instruction of juries (B) doubtful of their ability to draw consistently correct conclusions based on the evidence (C) critical of their failure to take into account potentially helpful research (D) pessimistic about their willingness to make significant changes in trial procedure (E) concerned about their allowing the presentation of complex and voluminous evidence in the courtroom 5 B 5. Which one of the following statements, if true, would most seriously undermine the author’s suggestion about the use of current psychological research in the courtroom? (A) All guidelines about human behavior must take account of variations in the patterns of human decision-making. (B) Current models of how humans make decisions apply reliably to individuals but do not hold for decisions made by groups. (C) The current conception of jury inferential error employed by judges has been in use for nearly a century. (D) Inferential errors can be more easily predicted in controlled situations such as the trial of lawsuits than in other kinds of decision making processes. (E) In certain predictable circumstances, juries are less susceptible to inferential errors than they are in other circumstances. 6 A 6. It can be inferred from the passage that the author would be most likely to agree with which of the following generalizations about lawyers? (A) They have a less sophisticated understanding of human cognition than do psychologists. (B) They often present complex or voluminous information merely in order to confuse a jury. (C) They are no better at making logical inferences from the testimony at a trial than are most judges. (D) They have worked to help judges minimize jury inferential error. (E) They are unrealistic about the ability of jurors to ascertain the truth. 7 E 7. The author would be most likely to agree with which one of the following generalizations about a jury’s decision making process? (A) The more evidence a jury has, the more likely it is that the jury will reach a reliable verdict. (B) Juries usually overestimate the value of visual evidence such as photographs. (C) Jurors have preconceptions about the behavior of defendants that prevent them from making an objective analysis of the evidence in a criminal trial. (D) Most of the jurors who make inferential errors during a trial do so because they are unaccustomed to having to make difficult decisions based on inferences. (E) The manner in which evidence is presented to a jury may influence the jury either to overestimate or to underestimate the value of that evidence. Source: LSAT Official PrepTest 13 ( December 1994 ) Difficulty Level: 700

Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 18:30

It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 18:30

Toolkit

Reading Comprehension (RC)

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Go to My Error Log Learn more

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Nov 20
UCR MBA Impact - Live Q&A with UCR AdCom & Student
07:30 AM PST
-
08:30 AM PST
Learn what truly sets the UC Riverside MBA apart and how it helps in your professional growth
Nov 22
GMAT RC Masterclass
11:00 AM IST
-
01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Nov 23
Conquer Algebra on the GMAT Focus Edition
11:00 AM IST
-
01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease.
Nov 25
Try OnDemand GMAT Masterclass
10:00 AM EST
-
11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.

Back to Forum

Create Topic

Faced with the problems of insufficient evidence, of conflicting evide

1 2

anurag2018

Joined: 12 Feb 2018

Last visit: 03 Dec 2021

Posts: 16

Given Kudos: 38

Location: India

Schools: Haas '24 Kellogg '24 LBS '24

GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V37 Verified score

Schools: Haas '24 Kellogg '24 LBS '24

GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V37 Verified score

Posts: 16

Kudos: 0

29 Sep 2021, 20:27

Kudos

Bookmarks

Can you please help with Q7? Is C wrong because of use of "usually" than "may"?

Sajjad1994

GRE Forum Moderator

Joined: 02 Nov 2016

Last visit: 19 Nov 2025

Posts: 17,304

Own Kudos:

49,313

Given Kudos: 6,180

GPA: 3.62

Products:

Posts: 17,304

Kudos: 49,313

01 Oct 2021, 09:33

Kudos

Bookmarks

anurag2018

Can you please help with Q7? Is C wrong because of use of "usually" than "may"?

Hi anurag2018

(C) is tricky, but it’s not a generalization that the author would agree with. Remember, the passage says that preconceptions about defendants with prior convictions influence juries, not that preconceptions about defendants in general are problematic.

Mck2023

Joined: 23 Feb 2020

Last visit: 09 Jun 2023

Posts: 131

Own Kudos:

Given Kudos: 297

Location: Nepal

GMAT 1: 650 Q44 V35 Verified score

Posts: 131

Kudos: 89

06 Oct 2021, 20:54

Kudos

Bookmarks

Hi Experts (GMATNinja VeritasKarishma )
Can you please help me with the Question No 1. Its asking about main idea of the passage. And I got stuck between A and E. After some analysis, I decided to go with E.
What is actually the primary purpose of the author? Just to tell about the inferential errors or to tell about the issues in and ways of mitigating those errors? If second case is true, then correct answer may be option E.
Please clarify. I could not know where I am going wrong. Thank you.

KarishmaB

Tutor

Joined: 16 Oct 2010

Last visit: 19 Nov 2025

Posts: 16,267

Own Kudos:

77,001

[2]

Given Kudos: 482

Location: Pune, India

Expert

Expert reply

Posts: 16,267

Kudos: 77,001

[2]

07 Oct 2021, 04:47

Kudos

Bookmarks

Mck2023

Mck2023

I understand your confusion but (A) is correct.

Nowhere does the author mention who should instruct the juries. He only tells us that the judges use a limited and primitive scope. Perhaps the judges could start instructing based on psychologists' conclusions. The point of the passage is not who should instruct but inferential errors juries make.

Ayushi0002

Joined: 07 May 2023

Last visit: 10 Oct 2025

Posts: 51

Own Kudos:

Given Kudos: 21

Posts: 51

Kudos: 23

30 Sep 2023, 08:54

Kudos

Bookmarks

Q2 - In this - "By applying the same cognitive tools they have developed and used over a lifetime, jurors engage in the inferential exercise that lawyers call fact-finding.”
Should this not indicate the answer to be E rather than D?
Not sure, though I was inbetween the two - if someone could clarify why not D - that would be great!!

(D) specific training for judges in the area of jury instruction

(E) restrictions on lawyers’ use of psychological research

Sajjad1994

GRE Forum Moderator

Joined: 02 Nov 2016

Last visit: 19 Nov 2025

Posts: 17,304

Own Kudos:

49,313

Given Kudos: 6,180

GPA: 3.62

Products:

Posts: 17,304

Kudos: 49,313

01 Oct 2023, 02:10

Kudos

Bookmarks

Ayushi0002

Explanation

2. Of the following hypothetical reforms in trial procedure, which one would the author be most likely to support as the best way to address the problem of jury inferential error?

Difficulty Level: 650

Paragraphs 3 and 4 address possible reforms. (D) fits well with Paragraph 4’s point that judges—with their “limited and primitive” understanding of the problem—aren’t always fulfilling their obligation to minimize jury error through explanation and clarification.

(A) is too extreme.

(B) Beyond the scope: Formal educational requirements is an issue often discussed in relation to juries, but isn’t discussed here.

(C) Defense testimony is mentioned earlier in Para 2, a sure sign that it’s not relevant to the reform discussion (Paragraphs 3 and 4). In any case, misleading defense testimony is only one of several causes of jury error mentioned, so you can infer that monitoring defense testimony wouldn’t provide a broadly effective remedy.

(E) should sound distinctly Opposite; the passage advocates wider understanding of psychological research.

Answer: E

VerbalBot

Non-Human User

Joined: 01 Oct 2013

Last visit: 04 Jan 2021

Posts: 18,830

Own Kudos:

986

Posts: 18,830

Kudos: 986

02 Sep 2025, 04:56

Kudos

Bookmarks

Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

1 2

Moderators:

GMATNinja

GMAT Club Verbal Expert

7443 posts

GMATNinjaTwo

GMAT Club Verbal Expert

231 posts

Sajjad1994

GRE Forum Moderator

17304 posts

miag