Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 09:33 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 09:33
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Himalayan
Joined: 26 Feb 2006
Last visit: 09 Aug 2011
Posts: 384
Own Kudos:
Posts: 384
Kudos: 627
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
kirakira
Joined: 02 May 2007
Last visit: 25 Jun 2007
Posts: 54
Own Kudos:
Posts: 54
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Fig
Joined: 01 May 2006
Last visit: 02 Feb 2025
Posts: 1,031
Own Kudos:
Posts: 1,031
Kudos: 253
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Fig
Joined: 01 May 2006
Last visit: 02 Feb 2025
Posts: 1,031
Own Kudos:
Posts: 1,031
Kudos: 253
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Himalayan
kirakira
Himalayan
Find an integer R.

(1) (|R|)!=1
(2) |R|=R!

(1) => R can be 1 or -1 => insuff

why R is only 1 and -1?


1! = 1 and |1| = |-1| = 1 :)
User avatar
ggarr
Joined: 12 Jun 2006
Last visit: 20 Mar 2010
Posts: 263
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 263
Kudos: 802
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Fig
kirakira
Himalayan
Find an integer R.

(1) (|R|)!=1
(2) |R|=R!

(C) it is

(1) => R can be 1 or -1 => insuff
(2) => R can be 1 or 2 => insuff

(1) & (2) => R = 1

(C) as well, I agree :)

To complete the stat 1 analysis, we have also R=0 as a possibility. 0! = 1 :)

In (2), isn't |R| = -R or R? If so, how can -R = R!. Can we "factorialize" a negative #? Same question w/stmnt. 1. Isn't (|R|) = (R) or (-R). I'm prob missing something.
User avatar
Himalayan
Joined: 26 Feb 2006
Last visit: 09 Aug 2011
Posts: 384
Own Kudos:
Posts: 384
Kudos: 627
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ggarr
Fig
kirakira
Himalayan
Find an integer R.

(1) (|R|)!=1
(2) |R|=R!

(C) it is

(1) => R can be 1 or -1 => insuff
(2) => R can be 1 or 2 => insuff

(1) & (2) => R = 1

(C) as well, I agree :)

To complete the stat 1 analysis, we have also R=0 as a possibility. 0! = 1 :)
In (2), isn't |R| = -R or R? If so, how can -R = R!. Can we "factorialize" a negative #? Same question w/stmnt. 1. Isn't (|R|) = (R) or (-R). I'm prob missing something.


-ve integers do not have factorials.

in 1, R can be -1, 0 and 1.
C is correct.
User avatar
Fig
Joined: 01 May 2006
Last visit: 02 Feb 2025
Posts: 1,031
Own Kudos:
Posts: 1,031
Kudos: 253
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ggarr
Fig
kirakira
Himalayan
Find an integer R.

(1) (|R|)!=1
(2) |R|=R!

(C) it is

(1) => R can be 1 or -1 => insuff
(2) => R can be 1 or 2 => insuff

(1) & (2) => R = 1

(C) as well, I agree :)

To complete the stat 1 analysis, we have also R=0 as a possibility. 0! = 1 :)
In (2), isn't |R| = -R or R? If so, how can -R = R!. Can we "factorialize" a negative #? Same question w/stmnt. 1. Isn't (|R|) = (R) or (-R). I'm prob missing something.


To me, I read this problem like this:

For 1: (|R|)! = 1
> (|1|)! = 1! = 1
> (|0|)! = 0! = 1
> (|-1|)! = 1! = 1

For 2: |R| = R!
> |1| = 1! = 1
> |2| = 2! = 2

We never have a factorization of a negative number :)
User avatar
FN
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Last visit: 07 May 2012
Posts: 1,576
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Location: New York City
Concentration: Social Enterprise
Schools:Wharton'11 HBS'12
Posts: 1,576
Kudos: 675
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I am going with C..

R?

|R|!=1, well if R=0, |-1|, 1, the factorial of these numbers=1

|R|=R!, well if R=1, or 2..then we meet the requirement

now R! is positive..so which implies..R has to be positive..therefore

taking both statment 1) and 2) together we know R=1

C it is
User avatar
Himalayan
Joined: 26 Feb 2006
Last visit: 09 Aug 2011
Posts: 384
Own Kudos:
Posts: 384
Kudos: 627
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Fig
kirakira
Himalayan
Find an integer R.

(1) (|R|)!=1
(2) |R|=R!

(C) it is

(1) => R can be 1 or -1 => insuff
(2) => R can be 1 or 2 => insuff

(1) & (2) => R = 1

(C) as well, I agree :)

To complete the stat 1 analysis, we have also R=0 as a possibility. 0! = 1 :)



you got C on completing this one. :lol:
User avatar
GMATBLACKBELT
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Last visit: 03 Jun 2013
Posts: 1,139
Own Kudos:
Posts: 1,139
Kudos: 1,878
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Ya its C. |R|= -R or R. So stmnts 1 and 2 are insuff.

But together since they both have 1 as a value, then its true... Well thats how the Kaplan book explains these things.



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Data Sufficiency (DS) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
Math Expert
105389 posts
GMAT Tutor
1924 posts