Let the roots be
r1 and r2
Given:
r1≠r2 (distinct roots)
∣r1−4∣ = ∣r2 - 4| (both are equidistant from 4)
This means that 4 is the midpoint of the two roots.
So:
(r1+r2) / 2 = 4 ⇒
r1 + r2 = 8
This is a crucial inference from the question stem itself.
Also, from the quadratic formula:
x^2 + bx + c = 0
⇒
Sum of roots = −b,
Product of roots = c
So if
r1+r2 = 8
⇒
−b=8
therefore, b=−8
So the stem alone tells us the sum of the roots is 8.
That already gives us one thing: b = -8.
We still need to find the greater root — but we don’t yet know what the roots are individually.
Let’s evaluate each statement.
Statement (1):
x is a factor of the expression x^2+bx+c
If
x is a factor, then:
x^2+bx+c = x(x+d) => x^2 + dx
But this would imply
c=0
So one of the roots is 0, and the other is −d
Let’s suppose
x ∣ x^2 + bx + c
x is a factor of the expression, which implies that one of the roots is 0. So:
Let’s suppose:
x^2 + bx +c = x(x+d) ⇒ x^2 + dx =x^2 + bx + c
⇒ c =0, b = d
So, we conclude:
c=0
One root is 0, the other is −b
Also from the stem, we know that the sum of the roots is 8:
0 + (−b) = 8
⇒ −b = 8
⇒ b = −8
Then:
The roots are
0 and 8
The greater root is 8
Statement (1) is sufficient.
Statement (2):
The sum of roots of the equation is 8
We already deduced from the stem that the roots are equidistant from 4 ⇒ sum is 8.
So this statement adds no new information.
Hence, Statement (2) is not sufficient.
Statement (1) alone is sufficient, but Statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
Answer: (A)