GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 15 Dec 2018, 03:30

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

## Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in December
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
2526272829301
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
303112345
Open Detailed Calendar
• ### Free GMAT Strategy Webinar

December 15, 2018

December 15, 2018

07:00 AM PST

09:00 AM PST

Aiming to score 760+? Attend this FREE session to learn how to Define your GMAT Strategy, Create your Study Plan and Master the Core Skills to excel on the GMAT.
• ### \$450 Tuition Credit & Official CAT Packs FREE

December 15, 2018

December 15, 2018

10:00 PM PST

11:00 PM PST

Get the complete Official GMAT Exam Pack collection worth \$100 with the 3 Month Pack (\$299)

# First GMAT AWA. Please tell me how it was and how I can improve.

Author Message
Intern
Joined: 28 Nov 2017
Posts: 1
First GMAT AWA. Please tell me how it was and how I can improve.  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Nov 2017, 02:44
Question:
The following appeared in a report issued by a Marketing Director:
Over the past two years, our website has converted a consistent 3% of its visitors into sales, with very little fluctuation. Clearly, then, our goal for the upcoming year should be to raise the number of visitors to our site by any means necessary. If we can double our number of visitors by casting a wider net on pay-per-click advertising and by creating site content that is more search-engine friendly, we'll double our sales.
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.
This argument states that its website has converted 3% of its visitors into sales for the last two years, and it also states that if the visitors to the website are doubled, the sales will double as well. This argument fails to consider various internal and external factors that could lead to an increase in visitor traffic without a proportional increase in sales and so while this argument makes sense when looking at it from one standpoint, it is not detailed enough to be logical and well reasoned.

Firstly, the argument assumes that while the current visitors to the website are actively searching for it and not seeing it in an advertisement, other visitors would still have as much interest in what the website sells. This is a flawed assumption because if a person is searching for a specific item and they go to the website they will be more likely to make a sale than someone who saw an advertisement and went to the website.
Lastly, the argument doesn't speak about how well established the website is and how many people know about the website. If the website is known to people on a wide scale and the additional visitors are people who already regularly buy from the website but are accessing it from advertisements, there will be no improvement in the sales at all.

The argument can be strengthened drastically if the author included what the product was, how well established the website is, how many visitors currently visit the website and how many sales are done by the same customer. Once all these points are in place, the argument can be analyzed better and the conclusion can be better evaluated.
Manager
Joined: 12 Nov 2017
Posts: 110
Location: India
GMAT 1: 650 Q50 V28
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
GPA: 2.8
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: First GMAT AWA. Please tell me how it was and how I can improve.  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Nov 2017, 03:34
lillysingh123123 wrote:
Question:
The following appeared in a report issued by a Marketing Director:
Over the past two years, our website has converted a consistent 3% of its visitors into sales, with very little fluctuation. Clearly, then, our goal for the upcoming year should be to raise the number of visitors to our site by any means necessary. If we can double our number of visitors by casting a wider net on pay-per-click advertising and by creating site content that is more search-engine friendly, we'll double our sales.
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.
This argument states that its website argument's website? has converted 3% of its visitors into sales for the last two years, and it also states that if the visitors to the website are doubled, the sales will double as well. This argument fails to consider various internal and external factors that could leadwhy past tense? to an increase in visitor traffic without a proportional increase in sales and so while this argument makes sense when looking at it from one standpoint, it is not detailed enough to be logical and well reasoned.

Firstly, the argument assumes that while the current visitors to the website are actively searching for it and not seeing it in an advertisement, other visitors would still have as much interest in what the website sells. This is a flawed assumption because if a person is searching for a specific item and they go to the website they will be more likely to make a sale than someone who saw an advertisement and went to the website.
Lastly, the argument doesn't speak about how well established the website is and how many people know about the website. If the website is known to people on a wide scale and the additional visitors are people who already regularlyalready buy on regular basis will sound better buy from the website but are accessing it from advertisements, there will be no improvement in the sales at all.

The argument can be strengthened drastically if the author included what the product waspast, how well established the website ispresent, how many visitors currently visit the website and how many sales are done by the same customer. Once all these points are in place, the argument can be analyzed better and the conclusion can be better evaluated.

It is nicely structured article with lots of key words. But, there are tense mismatches on several occasions.
I would rate it 4 out of 6.
Re: First GMAT AWA. Please tell me how it was and how I can improve. &nbs [#permalink] 29 Nov 2017, 03:34
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# First GMAT AWA. Please tell me how it was and how I can improve.

Moderator: HKD1710

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.