GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 21 Jun 2018, 04:54

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Five years ago Jim was three times as old as Raoul was and Monica was

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 46251
Five years ago Jim was three times as old as Raoul was and Monica was [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Mar 2017, 07:01
1
2
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  75% (hard)

Question Stats:

47% (02:03) correct 53% (02:08) wrong based on 78 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Five years ago Jim was three times as old as Raoul was and Monica was six years older than Raoul was. If all three are still living in five years, which of the following must be true about their ages five years from now?

I. Monica is older than Jim.
II. Raoul is six years younger than Monica
III. The combined ages of Jim and Raoul are more than Monica's age.

A. I only
B. II only
C. I and II
D. I and III
E. II and III

_________________

New to the Math Forum?
Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread | All You Need for Quant | PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!!

Resources:
GMAT Math Book | Triangles | Polygons | Coordinate Geometry | Factorials | Circles | Number Theory | Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets | PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders | GMAT Prep Software Analysis | SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS) | Tricky questions from previous years.

Collection of Questions:
PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat

DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.


What are GMAT Club Tests?
Extra-hard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics

Director
Director
User avatar
P
Joined: 05 Mar 2015
Posts: 971
Five years ago Jim was three times as old as Raoul was and Monica was [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 30 Mar 2017, 10:36
Bunuel wrote:
Five years ago Jim was three times as old as Raoul was and Monica was six years older than Raoul was. If all three are still living in five years, which of the following must be true about their ages five years from now?

I. Monica is older than Jim.
II. Raoul is six years younger than Monica
III. The combined ages of Jim and Raoul are more than Monica's age.

A. I only
B. II only
C. I and II
D. I and III
E. II and III


Case 1:-
Let present age of raoul =6yrs
then 5 yrs back his age =1 yrs
then jim =3*Roaul= 3 yrs...
but monica's age was then =1+6=7 yrs

Case 2:-
Let present age of raoul =25yrs
then 5 yrs back his age =20 yrs
then jim =3*Roaul= 60yrs...
but monica's age was then =20+6=26yrs

(1) From case1 --> monica is older than jim
From case2-----> monica is younger than jim
Not true

(2)true for both cases

(3) true for case 2
False for case 1
not true

Ans B

Originally posted by rohit8865 on 29 Mar 2017, 10:55.
Last edited by rohit8865 on 30 Mar 2017, 10:36, edited 1 time in total.
Wharton Thread Master
User avatar
D
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1021
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Five years ago Jim was three times as old as Raoul was and Monica was [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Mar 2017, 11:12
Bunuel wrote:
Five years ago Jim was three times as old as Raoul was and Monica was six years older than Raoul was. If all three are still living in five years, which of the following must be true about their ages five years from now?

I. Monica is older than Jim.
II. Raoul is six years younger than Monica
III. The combined ages of Jim and Raoul are more than Monica's age.

A. I only
B. II only
C. I and II
D. I and III
E. II and III


Let the present ages of Jim, Raoul and Monica be J, R and M respectively.

5 years ago, we will have the following equations as per the question:
(J-5)=3(R-5) which can be simplified to => J=3R-10 ....................[A]
and, M=R+6 ...................................................................................

As per [A] ,the minimum value of R should be minimum 4 for J to be alive.
Case 1: When R=4, J=2 and M=10
Case 2: When R=20, J=40 and M=26

Therefore, the answer should be II ---> B
[b]
Hi Bunuel, please correct me if I am wrong in my assumption regarding the question.

_________________

Kudos if my post helps!

Long And A Fruitful Journey - V21 to V41; If I can, So Can You!!


My study resources:
1. Useful Formulae, Concepts and Tricks-Quant
2. e-GMAT's ALL SC Compilation
3. LSAT RC compilation
4. Actual LSAT CR collection by Broal
5. QOTD RC (Carcass)
6. Challange OG RC
7. GMAT Prep Challenge RC

Director
Director
User avatar
P
Joined: 05 Mar 2015
Posts: 971
Re: Five years ago Jim was three times as old as Raoul was and Monica was [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Mar 2017, 11:25
gmatexam439 wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
Five years ago Jim was three times as old as Raoul was and Monica was six years older than Raoul was. If all three are still living in five years, which of the following must be true about their ages five years from now?

I. Monica is older than Jim.
II. Raoul is six years younger than Monica
III. The combined ages of Jim and Raoul are more than Monica's age.

A. I only
B. II only
C. I and II
D. I and III
E. II and III


Let the present ages of Jim, Raoul and Monica be J, R and M respectively.

5 years ago, we will have the following equations as per the question:
(J-5)=3(R-5) which can be simplified to => J=3R-10 ....................[A]
and, M=R+6 ...................................................................................

As per [A] ,the minimum value of R should be minimum 4for J to be alive.
Case 1: When R=4, J=2 and M=10
Case 2: When R=20, J=40 and M=26

Therefore, the answer should be II ---> B
[b]
Hi Bunuel, please correct me if I am wrong in my assumption regarding the question.


Hope bunuel too respond....

but for now the highlighted part is not correct....
R should be minimum of 5 Yrs ...
Wharton Thread Master
User avatar
D
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1021
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Five years ago Jim was three times as old as Raoul was and Monica was [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Mar 2017, 11:37
rohit8865 wrote:
gmatexam439 wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
Five years ago Jim was three times as old as Raoul was and Monica was six years older than Raoul was. If all three are still living in five years, which of the following must be true about their ages five years from now?

I. Monica is older than Jim.
II. Raoul is six years younger than Monica
III. The combined ages of Jim and Raoul are more than Monica's age.

A. I only
B. II only
C. I and II
D. I and III
E. II and III


Let the present ages of Jim, Raoul and Monica be J, R and M respectively.

5 years ago, we will have the following equations as per the question:
(J-5)=3(R-5) which can be simplified to => J=3R-10 ....................[A]
and, M=R+6 ...................................................................................

As per [A] ,the minimum value of R should be minimum 4for J to be alive.
Case 1: When R=4, J=2 and M=10
Case 2: When R=20, J=40 and M=26

Therefore, the answer should be II ---> B
[b]
Hi Bunuel, please correct me if I am wrong in my assumption regarding the question.


Hope bunuel too respond....

but for now the highlighted part is not correct....
R should be minimum of 5 Yrs ...



I am sorry my silly mistake ... but I think it should 6 and not 5 because if R=5, J will be 0 five years ago which is not as per our assumption .... therefore if R>=6, then
case1: When R=6, J=8 and M=12
case2: as per above post;

Therefore answer should be E and not C.
_________________

Kudos if my post helps!

Long And A Fruitful Journey - V21 to V41; If I can, So Can You!!


My study resources:
1. Useful Formulae, Concepts and Tricks-Quant
2. e-GMAT's ALL SC Compilation
3. LSAT RC compilation
4. Actual LSAT CR collection by Broal
5. QOTD RC (Carcass)
6. Challange OG RC
7. GMAT Prep Challenge RC

Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 18 Aug 2014
Posts: 52
Location: India
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V40
GPA: 3.11
Reviews Badge
Re: Five years ago Jim was three times as old as Raoul was and Monica was [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Mar 2017, 19:44
Assume ages of Joe,Roula and monica five years back = J ,R,M respectivily

given that J = 3R and M=R+6 (this is 5 years back)
so 5 years from now the ages will be (we need to add 10 to each age)
J = 3R+10
M= R+16
and R = R+10

I. Monica is older than Jim.
Not true. because R should be at least 10 years old then J >M

II. Raoul is six years younger than Monica
True. From the equation R-M = 16-10 =6

III. The combined ages of Jim and Raoul are more than Monica's age.
True. J+M = 4R+20
M = R+16
therefore J+M > M

Hence answer is E



Statement 1 :
_________________

Today's actions are tomorrow's results

SVP
SVP
User avatar
P
Joined: 26 Mar 2013
Posts: 1676
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Five years ago Jim was three times as old as Raoul was and Monica was [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Mar 2017, 13:44
Bunuel wrote:
Five years ago Jim was three times as old as Raoul was and Monica was six years older than Raoul was. If all three are still living in five years, which of the following must be true about their ages five years from now?

I. Monica is older than Jim.
II. Raoul is six years younger than Monica
III. The combined ages of Jim and Raoul are more than Monica's age.

A. I only
B. II only
C. I and II
D. I and III
E. II and III


Let CURRENT ages of Jim=j, Raoul=r, and Monica=m

Five Years ago: Jim=j-5, Raoul=r-5, and Monica=m-5

Set up equations:
j-5=3(r-5)...........j+10=3r
m-5=r-5+6........m=r+6

Because we have only 2 equations in 3 variables, there is open cases. So we need to be careful to choose numbers that cover multiple cases.

Plug in numbers:
case 1: r=7, j=11, m=13, After 5 Yeas: r=12, j=16, m=18

case 2: r=10, j=20, m=16, After 5 Years: r=15, j=25, m=21

Checking Numeral I as it is most frequent.

From case 1: m>j

From case 2: m<j

Not always true...........Eliminate A,C & D

To save time, check Numeral III not II. Because if you do II and get correct then you will move to III. But we do III first, you will eliminate one choice in one step.

From case 1: r+j>m

From case 2: r+j>m

Therefore, Eliminate choice B

Answer: E
Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Target Test Prep Representative
User avatar
G
Status: Founder & CEO
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Posts: 2758
Location: United States (CA)
Re: Five years ago Jim was three times as old as Raoul was and Monica was [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Apr 2017, 16:04
1
1
Bunuel wrote:
Five years ago Jim was three times as old as Raoul was and Monica was six years older than Raoul was. If all three are still living in five years, which of the following must be true about their ages five years from now?

I. Monica is older than Jim.
II. Raoul is six years younger than Monica
III. The combined ages of Jim and Raoul are more than Monica's age.

A. I only
B. II only
C. I and II
D. I and III
E. II and III



We can let Jim’s age today = J, Raoul’s age today = R, and Monica’s age today = M.

Let’s set up their ages 5 years ago: Jim was (J - 5), Rauol was (R - 5), and Monica was (M - 5).

Since five years ago Jim was three times as old as Raoul was:

(J - 5) = 3(R - 5)

J - 5 = 3R - 15

J = 3R - 10

Since five years ago Monica was six years older than Raoul was:

(M - 5) = (R - 5) + 6

M - 5 = R + 1

M = R + 6

Notice that Raoul is the youngest of the three people, and Raoul must be more than 5 years old since only then can we talk about their ages 5 years ago.

Let’s now test each Roman numeral:

I. Monica is older than Jim.

We can represent Monica's age in 5 years as M + 5, or R + 6 + 5 = R + 11.

We can represent Jim’s age in 5 years as J + 5, or 3R - 10 + 5 = 3R - 5.

Is M + 5 > J + 5 ?

Is R + 11 > 3R - 5 ?

Is 16 > 2R ?

Is 8 > R ?

Is R < 8?

We know that R > 5, however, we can’t determine whether R < 8. Thus, we cannot determine whether Monica is older than Jim.

II. Raoul is six years younger than Monica

Since M = R + 6, in 5 years Raoul will still be 6 years younger than Monica. Roman numeral II is true.

III. The combined ages of Jim and Raoul are more than Monica's age.

We already see that in 5 years, Monica’s age will be R + 11, Jim’s age will be 3R - 5, and Raoul’s age will be R + 5. We can create the following inequality:

Is 3R - 5 + R + 5 > R + 11 ?

Is 4R > R + 11 ?

Is 3R > 11 ?

Is R > 11/3 ?

We know that R > 5, so R > 11/3. Thus Roman numeral III is true.

Answer: E
_________________

Scott Woodbury-Stewart
Founder and CEO

GMAT Quant Self-Study Course
500+ lessons 3000+ practice problems 800+ HD solutions

Expert Post
Top Contributor
CEO
CEO
User avatar
P
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Posts: 2564
Location: Canada
Re: Five years ago Jim was three times as old as Raoul was and Monica was [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Apr 2018, 08:16
Top Contributor
Bunuel wrote:
Five years ago Jim was three times as old as Raoul was and Monica was six years older than Raoul was. If all three are still living in five years, which of the following must be true about their ages five years from now?

I. Monica is older than Jim.
II. Raoul is six years younger than Monica
III. The combined ages of Jim and Raoul are more than Monica's age.

A. I only
B. II only
C. I and II
D. I and III
E. II and III


Let R = Raoul's PRESENT age
So, R - 5 = Raoul's age 5 YEARS AGO

Five years ago .... Monica was six years older than Raoul was.
So, (R - 5) + 6 = Monica's age 5 YEARS AGO
In other words, R + 1 = Monica's age 5 YEARS AGO

Five years ago Jim was three times as old as Raoul was
So, 3(R - 5) = Jim's age 5 YEARS AGO

IMPORTANT: In order for us to know the information about Raoul's age 5 years ago, it must be the case that Raoul's PRESENT age is greater than 5. Otherwise, Raoul wouldn't have been alive 5 years ago

To find the ages 5 years in the FUTURE, we must take these ages for 5 years ago and add 10 years.

So, (R - 5) + 10 = Raoul's age 5 YEARS IN THE FUTURE
R + 1 + 10 = Monica's age 5 YEARS IN THE FUTURE
3(R - 5) + 10 = Jim's age 5 YEARS IN THE FUTURE

SIMPLIFY to get:
R + 5 = Raoul's age 5 YEARS IN THE FUTURE
R + 11 = Monica's age 5 YEARS IN THE FUTURE
3R - 5 = Jim's age 5 YEARS IN THE FUTURE


Now, let's examine the statements:

I. Monica is older than Jim.
MUST it be the case that R + 11 is greater than 3R - 5?
No.
If R = 10, then R + 11 = 21 and 3R - 5 = 25
So, if R = 10, Monica is NOT older than Jim (5 years from now)
So, statement 1 need not be true.

We can ELIMINATE answer choices A, C and D

IMPORTANT: Notice that the remaining answer choices (B and E) both say that statement II is correct.
So, we need not check statement II, since it MUST be correct.

III. The combined ages of Jim and Raoul are more than Monica's age.

Is it true that (3R - 5) + (R + 5) > (R + 11)?
Let's simplify to get: 4R > R + 11
Subtract R from both sides to get: 3R > 11
Divide both sides by 3 to get: R > 11/3
MUST this be TRUE?
Yes. It must be true, because we earlier concluded that it must be the case that R is greater than 5
So statement III must be true.

Answer: E

RELATED VIDEO FROM OUR COURSE

_________________

Brent Hanneson – Founder of gmatprepnow.com

Image

Re: Five years ago Jim was three times as old as Raoul was and Monica was   [#permalink] 03 Apr 2018, 08:16
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Five years ago Jim was three times as old as Raoul was and Monica was

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.