Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 02:32 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 02:32
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Vijo
Joined: 01 Jan 2005
Last visit: 11 Jul 2005
Posts: 76
Own Kudos:
Location: NJ
Posts: 76
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
MA
Joined: 25 Nov 2004
Last visit: 09 Aug 2011
Posts: 697
Own Kudos:
Posts: 697
Kudos: 515
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
FN
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Last visit: 07 May 2012
Posts: 1,576
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Location: New York City
Concentration: Social Enterprise
Schools:Wharton'11 HBS'12
Posts: 1,576
Kudos: 675
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
kevinw
Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Last visit: 14 Jun 2006
Posts: 56
Own Kudos:
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 56
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
what happens is you plug 3 into II) ???

:?
avatar
jma123
Joined: 04 Feb 2005
Last visit: 30 Aug 2005
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
Posts: 7
Kudos: 47
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I thought this could be done using algebra:

S1: x* = x
x(x-1) = x
x-1=1
x=2
sufficient

S2:
(x-1)(x-2)=x-2
x-1=1
x=2
suff

what am I doing wrong?
avatar
HongHu
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Last visit: 25 Apr 2011
Posts: 966
Own Kudos:
Posts: 966
Kudos: 796
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
You thinking process is correct and very good, but you made an algebra mistake.

S1: x* = x
x(x-1) = x
x(x-1)-x=0
x(x-2)=0
x=0 or x=2

non unique solution
insufficient

S2:
(x-1)(x-2)=x-2
(x-1)(x-2)-(x-2)=0
(x-2)(x-2)=0
x=2
unique solution
sufficient
avatar
jma123
Joined: 04 Feb 2005
Last visit: 30 Aug 2005
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
Posts: 7
Kudos: 47
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hmm, I had thought I could divide through:

S1: x(x-1) = x
divide both side by x --> x-1 = 1

S2: (x-1)(x-2) = (x-2)
divide both sides by x-2 --> x-1 = 1

So to be on the safe side for the test, that we should multiply out instead of cancelling out?
User avatar
Arsene_Wenger
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Last visit: 27 Nov 2006
Posts: 286
Own Kudos:
Posts: 286
Kudos: 55
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
HongHu
You thinking process is correct and very good, but you made an algebra mistake.

S1: x* = x
x(x-1) = x
x(x-1)-x=0
x(x-2)=0
x=0 or x=2

non unique solution
insufficient

S2:
(x-1)(x-2)=x-2
(x-1)(x-2)-(x-2)=0
(x-2)(x-2)=0
x=2
unique solution
sufficient


I solved this problem and arrived at (D) in about 30 seconds, even though i agree it is (B). I was glad because to me, i may have made up a lot of time by answering it in 30 secs. But what happens when one faces these questions on matchday? Wont it seem to be a waste of time plugging in nos. (-2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 1/4, etc) when simple algebra seems to work in solving the problem?
User avatar
banerjeea_98
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Last visit: 17 May 2012
Posts: 676
Own Kudos:
Posts: 676
Kudos: 201
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Arsene_Wenger
HongHu
You thinking process is correct and very good, but you made an algebra mistake.

S1: x* = x
x(x-1) = x
x(x-1)-x=0
x(x-2)=0
x=0 or x=2

non unique solution
insufficient

S2:
(x-1)(x-2)=x-2
(x-1)(x-2)-(x-2)=0
(x-2)(x-2)=0
x=2
unique solution
sufficient

I solved this problem and arrived at (D) in about 30 seconds, even though i agree it is (B). I was glad because to me, i may have made up a lot of time by answering it in 30 secs. But what happens when one faces these questions on matchday? Wont it seem to be a waste of time plugging in nos. (-2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 1/4, etc) when simple algebra seems to work in solving the problem?


my personal opinion, if u see eqn always use algebra, my personal opinion is plugging no is waste of time, more importantly u always have doubts whether u covered all possinbilities, algebra sol is bullet proof. Offcourse, there r cases when only plugging will work.
User avatar
MA
Joined: 25 Nov 2004
Last visit: 09 Aug 2011
Posts: 697
Own Kudos:
Posts: 697
Kudos: 515
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Arsene_Wenger
HongHu
You thinking process is correct and very good, but you made an algebra mistake.
I solved this problem and arrived at (D) in about 30 seconds, even though i agree it is (B). I was glad because to me, i may have made up a lot of time by answering it in 30 secs. But what happens when one faces these questions on matchday? Wont it seem to be a waste of time plugging in nos. (-2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 1/4, etc) when simple algebra seems to work in solving the problem?

my personal opinion, if u see eqn always use algebra, my personal opinion is plugging no is waste of time, more importantly u always have doubts whether u covered all possinbilities, algebra sol is bullet proof. Offcourse, there r cases when only plugging will work.


Absoutly right. I agree with Banerjee. Plugging in is last resort.
User avatar
Arsene_Wenger
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Last visit: 27 Nov 2006
Posts: 286
Own Kudos:
Posts: 286
Kudos: 55
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jma123
Hmm, I had thought I could divide through:

S1: x(x-1) = x
divide both side by x --> x-1 = 1

S2: (x-1)(x-2) = (x-2)
divide both sides by x-2 --> x-1 = 1

So to be on the safe side for the test, that we should multiply out instead of cancelling out?


This was also my approach. Can anyone tell why we cannot divide both sides by a common term as in jma's approach in S1?
User avatar
vprabhala
Joined: 21 Sep 2004
Last visit: 10 Aug 2005
Posts: 223
Own Kudos:
Posts: 223
Kudos: 161
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I too did the same as jma123. can somebody explain why i shouldn't be doing that/
avatar
HongHu
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Last visit: 25 Apr 2011
Posts: 966
Own Kudos:
Posts: 966
Kudos: 796
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
You need to be very careful when you do algebra derivations. One of the common mistake is to divide both side by "a common term". Remember you can only do this safely if the "common term" is a constant. However you CAN't do it if it contains a variable.

Example:

x(x-2)=x
You can't cancel out the x on both side and say x=3 is the solution. You must move the x on the right side to the left side.
x(x-2)-x=0
x(x-2-1)=0
The solutions are: x=0 and x=3
The reason why you can't divided both sides by x is that when x is zero, you can't divide anything by zero.
User avatar
Arsene_Wenger
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Last visit: 27 Nov 2006
Posts: 286
Own Kudos:
Posts: 286
Kudos: 55
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks HongHu 8-)



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Data Sufficiency (DS) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
Math Expert
105379 posts
GMAT Tutor
1924 posts