Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon, Tues, Wed, Thur, Fri Sept. 28, 2026 - Oct. 16, 2027, 7:00pm-10:00pm EST
" Description: Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thur Sept. 29, 2026 - Dec. 3, 2026, 11:00am-1:00pm EST
Welcome to the GMAT Club's Free Interview Prep Event for Top MBA Programs! Buy tickets - Virtual series that’s all set to equip you to -excel in your MBA interviews.
Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Saturdays Oct. 3, 2026 - Dec. 26, 2026, 1:00pm-4:00pm EST
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
This is a Yes/No question. For sufficiency, a definite "yes" would show that the product (x + 3)(x2 + 3x + 2) is divisible by 4, or a definite "no" would show that it is not.
Let’s simplify the product by factoring it:
(x + 3)(x^2 + 3x + 2)
(x + 3)(x^2 + 3x + 2)
(x + 3)(x + 2)(x + 1)
If the value of x makes any of these three factors divisible by 4, then the entire product will be divisible by 4.
In any set of four consecutive integers, exactly one will be a multiple of 4. Therefore, if x is a multiple of 4, then neither (x + 3), (x + 2), nor (x + 1) will be. However, if x is not a multiple of 4, exactly one of (x + 3), (x + 2), and (x + 1) must be.
Therefore, for sufficiency we need to know whether x is a multiple of 4.
Evaluate the Statements:
Statement (1): We are told that (x+3)/5 is an odd integer. Let’s translate this into an equation so we can learn about x:
(x+3)/5 = odd
x + 3 = 5(odd)
x = 5(odd) – 3
This tells us that x is even, so it might be a multiple of 4 but also might not. Statement (1) is Insufficient.
Picking Numbers can illustrate this. If = 1, then x + 3 = 5. This yields x = 2. Hence, (x + 3)(x + 2)(x + 1) = (5)(4)(3). This must be divisible by 4, as 4 is one of the terms.
But it could be that = 3, then x + 3 = 15. This yields x = 12. Hence, (x + 3)(x + 2)(x + 1) = (15)(14)(13). This is not divisible by 4.
Since (x + 3)(x + 2)(x + 1) might or might not be divisible by 4, Statement (1) is Insufficient to answer the question with a definite "yes" or a definite "no." Eliminate choices (A) and (D).
Statement (2): We are told that that x is divisible by 16. If x is divisible by 16, we also know that x is divisible by 4, since 16 is a multiple of 4. This is what we needed; Statement (2) is Sufficient.
We can also use Picking Numbers. If x = 16, then (x + 3)(x + 2)(x + 1) = (19)(18)(17). We wouldn’t want to actually calculate this, but there is a way around the calculations. Since 4 = 2 x 2, a number must have at least two factors of 2 to be divisible by 4. The product (19)(18)(17) has only one factor of 2, so it is not divisible by 4.
If x = 32, then (x + 3)(x + 2)(x + 1) = (35)(34)(33), which also has only one factor of 2 and is thus not divisible by 2.
Since (x + 3)(x + 2)(x + 1) cannot be divisible by 4, Statement (2) is Sufficient to answer the question with a definite "no." Eliminate choices (C) and (E).
I got a question regarding statement 2. x is divisible by 16 means 0,16,32,48 are the potential values for x. But 0 won't make (x+3)*(x+2)*(x+1) divisible by 4. Hence, stmt 2 is insuffienct, is it not?
For all values of the integer x, is the product (x + 3)(x^2 + 3x + 2) divisible by 4?
(1) (x + 3)/5 is an odd integer (2) x is divisible by 16
Show more
(x+3)(x^2+3x+2)=(x+3) (x+2) (x+1)
We need to check if (x+3) (x+2) (x+1)/4
(1) x+3/5 does not help much with the equation. Not sufficient.
(2) x is divisible by 16, then x must be some multiple of 16. When we take x as 16, x+3=19, x+2=18, x+1=17 None of the numbers are divisible by 4. Statement 2 helps us in answering teh question.
I got a question regarding statement 2. x is divisible by 16 means 0,16,32,48 are the potential values for x. But 0 won't make (x+3)*(x+2)*(x+1) divisible by 4. Hence, stmt 2 is insuffienct, is it not?
Mbat
Show more
you see MunkhbatBat 16 is even since X is div 4 16 is a multiple of 4 so Stmt2 is sufficient to deduce it will be divisible
What about 0 as a solution for statement two? 0 is divisible by 16. Yet by substituting 0 into (x+3)*(x+2)*(x+1) we wont get a multiple of 4. Hence stmt two is insufficient?
A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.
This is a Yes/No question. For sufficiency, a definite "yes" would show that the product (x + 3)(x2 + 3x + 2) is divisible by 4, or a definite "no" would show that it is not.
Let’s simplify the product by factoring it:
(x + 3)(x2 + 3x + 2)
(x + 3)(x2 + 3x + 2)
(x + 3)(x + 2)(x + 1)
If the value of x makes any of these three factors divisible by 4, then the entire product will be divisible by 4.
In any set of four consecutive integers, exactly one will be a multiple of 4. Therefore, if x is a multiple of 4, then neither (x + 3), (x + 2), nor (x + 1) will be. However, if x is not a multiple of 4, exactly one of (x + 3), (x + 2), and (x + 1) must be.
Therefore, for sufficiency we need to know whether x is a multiple of 4.
Evaluate the Statements:
Statement (1): We are told that is an odd integer. Let’s translate this into an equation so we can learn about x:
= odd
x + 3 = 5(odd)
x = 5(odd) – 3
This tells us that x is even, so it might be a multiple of 4 but also might not. Statement (1) is Insufficient.
Picking Numbers can illustrate this. If = 1, then x + 3 = 5. This yields x = 2. Hence, (x + 3)(x + 2)(x + 1) = (5)(4)(3). This must be divisible by 4, as 4 is one of the terms.
But it could be that = 3, then x + 3 = 15. This yields x = 12. Hence, (x + 3)(x + 2)(x + 1) = (15)(14)(13). This is not divisible by 4.
Since (x + 3)(x + 2)(x + 1) might or might not be divisible by 4, Statement (1) is Insufficient to answer the question with a definite "yes" or a definite "no." Eliminate choices (A) and (D).
Statement (2): We are told that that x is divisible by 16. If x is divisible by 16, we also know that x is divisible by 4, since 16 is a multiple of 4. This is what we needed; Statement (2) is Sufficient.
We can also use Picking Numbers. If x = 16, then (x + 3)(x + 2)(x + 1) = (19)(18)(17). We wouldn’t want to actually calculate this, but there is a way around the calculations. Since 4 = 2 x 2, a number must have at least two factors of 2 to be divisible by 4. The product (19)(18)(17) has only one factor of 2, so it is not divisible by 4.
If x = 32, then (x + 3)(x + 2)(x + 1) = (35)(34)(33), which also has only one factor of 2 and is thus not divisible by 2.
Since (x + 3)(x + 2)(x + 1) cannot be divisible by 4, Statement (2) is Sufficient to answer the question with a definite "no." Eliminate choices (C) and (E).
Therefore, Choice (B) is correct.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.