Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
0%
(00:00)
correct 0%
(00:00)
wrong
based on 5
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
From a letter to the commercial editor of a newspaper: Your article of January 9 drew attention to the large deficit in Playland's balance of payments that has worsened over the past three years. Yet, you favor the recent trade treaty signed between Playland and Workland. That treaty results in a lowering of our import duties that will flood us with Workland's goods. This will only exacerbate our balance of trade. How can you be in favor of the treaty?
Which of the following considerations would weaken the letter writer's argument?
(A)Import diversion versus import creation.
(B)Prices paid by importers versus prices paid by consumers
(C)Economic goals versus political goals
(D) Duties levied increase government revenue
(E)Free trade versus protectionism
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
(A)Import diversion versus import creation
I don't see any import creation over here and so its out of scope.
(B)Prices paid by importers versus prices paid by consumers
If the prices paid by importers are reduced, then the prices paid by consumer are also reduced.
(C)Economic goals versus political goals
Out of Scope
(D) Duties levied increase government revenue
It strengthens it.
(E)Free trade versus protectionism
It could be true and might not hold in all cases.
I thought it was E because when it comes to free market the import duties hardly some into picture and the journal/whatever is justified in atleast tending towards such an economy.
This is a hard one for me too. I have to use POE for this, I think.
The argument:
Fact: Playland has large balance of payment deficit
Fact: Trade treaty between P and W requires lowering of P's import duties and will make worse of P's balance of trade.
Conclusion: The treaty should not be supported.
Ask for weakening.
(A)Import diversion versus import creation.
Not sure.
(B)Prices paid by importers versus prices paid by consumers
Lowering of prices by importers and consumers is a good thing. However it doesn't solve the trade balance problem.
(C)Economic goals versus political goals
Not sure.
(D) Duties levied increase government revenue
Duties levid increase government revenue, therefore less import duties means less gov revenue, making the BOP even worse. Support the argument.
(E)Free trade versus protectionism
Not sure. Seems out of scope since the argument is not really about protecting domestic industries.
In the end I was able to eliminate only two choices with confidence, and a third one with reluctance. Choose from (A) and (C), it seems that (A) directly talks about the issue of trade while the other is a little out of scope. So I would pick (A).
Assuming P has to rely only on imports, by reducing the taxes on import from W, P can consolidate the buying power and can bargain, because of its buying power.
--== Message from the GMAT Club Team ==--
THERE IS LIKELY A BETTER DISCUSSION OF THIS EXACT QUESTION. This discussion does not meet community quality standards. It has been retired.
If you would like to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum. Thank you!
To review the GMAT Club's Forums Posting Guidelines, please follow these links: Quantitative | Verbal Please note - we may remove posts that do not follow our posting guidelines. Thank you.
Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).
Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.