Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Join us in a live GMAT practice session and solve 25 challenging GMAT questions with other test takers in timed conditions, covering GMAT Quant, Data Sufficiency, Data Insights, Reading Comprehension, and Critical Reasoning questions.
Scoring 329 on the GRE is not always about using more books, more courses, or a longer study plan. In this episode of GRE Success Talks, Ashutosh shares his GRE preparation strategy, study plan, and test-day experience, explaining how he kept his prep....
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight Fair – the world’s premier event for serious MBA candidates. This is your chance to hear directly from Admissions Directors at nearly every Top 30 MBA program..
So, I know I can calculate the possibilities w/o constraints and subtract the possibilities with constraints and get the answer as 6! - 5! to get 480. What I am trying to think is in terms of the following (which works for most problems, but I can't figure out why this model doesn't fit this situation)
I have 6 possibilities for Seat 1 and I assume its M, so possibilities = 6. Now, I have 4 possibilities for Seat 2 because J won't sit with M, so possibilities = 4 Now, I have 4 possibilities again for Seat 3 because M is back in the group, so possibilities = 4 And then finally 3 and 2, so possibilities = 3 * 2
Multiplying, 6 * 4 * 4 * 6 = 576 possibilities.
Where am I formulating this wrongly?
Thanks in advance.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
G, M, P, J, B and C are supposed to sit in 6 different seats. But M and J won't sit together, how many different arrangements are possible?
So, I know I can calculate the possibilities w/o constraints and subtract the possibilities with constraints and get the answer as 6! - 5! to get 480. What I am trying to think is in terms of the following (which works for most problems, but I can't figure out why this model doesn't fit this situation)
I have 6 possibilities for Seat 1 and I assume its M, so possibilities = 6. Now, I have 4 possibilities for Seat 2 because J won't sit with M, so possibilities = 4 Now, I have 4 possibilities again for Seat 3 because M is back in the group, so possibilities = 4 And then finally 3 and 2, so possibilities = 3 * 2
Multiplying, 6 * 4 * 4 * 6 = 576 possibilities.
Where am I formulating this wrongly?
Thanks in advance.
Show more
To solve this you can do one of two things: 1. find the total number of outcomes and then subtract the number of invalid outcomes based on the constraints 2. Count the number of valid outcomes based on the constraints
1) total number of outcomes = 6! invalid outcomes would be when M & J sit together can be visualized by the following:
M J _ _ _ _ _ M J _ _ _ _ _ M J _ _ _ _ _ M J _ _ _ _ _ M J
this equals 5*4! = 5! but you need to consider that M J do not need to be in that order, it could be J M, so multiply your outcomes by 2. Therefore your total invalid outcomes based on the constrains is 2*5! = 240
and thus the answer is 6! - 2*5! = 720-240 = 480
(looks like you forgot the 2 multiplier in your answer)
2) the number of valid outcomes can be visualized as follows:
M _ J _ _ _ M _ _ J _ _ M _ _ _ J _ M _ _ _ _ J
_ M _ J _ _ _ M _ _ J _ _ M _ _ _ J
_ _ M _ J _ _ _ M _ _ J
_ _ _ M _ J
so we have (4+3+2+1)*4! = 10*4!
but we have to consider that M J do not to need to be in that order, it could be J M, so double what we got to get: 2*10*4! = 480
your logic in trying to this problem using approach #2 is off. Although you can use this method when doing permutations, the constraints don't allow you to do it this way because depending on who is in the first seat the values for the other seats will be different. Avoid using this when there are dependencies on position. In your calculations, first you are saying that there is 6 possibilities for the first seat, but then you calculate for when that seat is for M, this would invalidate the first 6 because setting that seat to M as in your assumption would make the first value a 1.
whenever you see dependencies, keep it simple and avoid confusion, use the following principles: 1. find the total number of outcomes and then subtract the number of invalid outcomes based on the constraints 2. Count the number of valid outcomes based on the constraints
Hope that helps..
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.