Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
0%
(00:00)
correct 0%
(00:00)
wrong
based on 1
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
practice question from MBAdotcom. Issue: What if S is larger than r? That will give us a fraction and not an integer.
Q: "If r and s are positive integers, is r over s an integer?
(1) Every factor of s is also a factor of r.
(2) Every prime factor of s is also a prime factor of r.
Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient. Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient. BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient. EACH statement ALONE is sufficient Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient
Provided explanation with the question: Arithmetic | Properties of numbers (1) The integer s is by definition a factor of itself. From this, every factor of s is also a factor of r. Therefore, r over s must be an integer; SUFFICIENT.
(2) From this, by example, if r = 18 and s = 6, then 6 has the prime factors 2 and 3, each of which is also a factor of 18, and r over s equals eighteen sixths, which is an integer. However, if r = 18 and s = 8, then r has the prime factors 2 and 3, and s has a prime factor 2, which satisfies this condition. Even though in this case the prime factor of s is a prime factor of r, r over s equals eighteen eighths, which is not an integer; NOT sufficient.
The correct answer is A; statement 1 alone is sufficient."
again, my concern is, what if S>R?
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
As per statement 1, If every factor of s is also a factor of r, it should mean that both the numbers should be equal. For example, if r =10 and s=5, then r will have 10 as an additional factor, which is not possible. Likewise, if s=10 and r=5, that case is also not possible. Hence, both numbers should be same and r/s will yield an integer. Statement 1 is sufficient.
practice question from MBAdotcom. Issue: What if S is larger than r? That will give us a fraction and not an integer.
Q: "If r and s are positive integers, is r over s an integer?
(1) Every factor of s is also a factor of r.
(2) Every prime factor of s is also a prime factor of r.
Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient. Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient. BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient. EACH statement ALONE is sufficient Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient
Provided explanation with the question: Arithmetic | Properties of numbers (1) The integer s is by definition a factor of itself. From this, every factor of s is also a factor of r. Therefore, r over s must be an integer; SUFFICIENT.
(2) From this, by example, if r = 18 and s = 6, then 6 has the prime factors 2 and 3, each of which is also a factor of 18, and r over s equals eighteen sixths, which is an integer. However, if r = 18 and s = 8, then r has the prime factors 2 and 3, and s has a prime factor 2, which satisfies this condition. Even though in this case the prime factor of s is a prime factor of r, r over s equals eighteen eighths, which is not an integer; NOT sufficient.
The correct answer is A; statement 1 alone is sufficient."
again, my concern is, what if S>R?
Show more
Hello there,
You can find a detailed discussion of this question at this link. If you have any further questions, please feel free to ask in the discussion thread. I hope you find the information helpful.
Additionally, I kindly request that you carefully read and follow our posting rules, which can be found at at this link. Thank you for your cooperation!
Please note that this topic has been locked and archived.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.