Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Aug 1410:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
Top Scores Start with a Elite Online Prep Course. Enroll for 6 months of access to over 400 hours of GMAT video lessons AND 715+ Score Guarantee!
Aug 1410:00 AM IST
-10:00 PM IST
Start your journey with a fully customized action plan and work with a dedicated mentor to achieve a 735+ score.
Aug 1512:01 AM PDT
-11:59 PM PDT
On the 15th, GMAT Club Tests will be Free! Including all the Quizzes, Questions, and Tests. 12 AM - 11:59 PM PST- Aug 11
12:00 PM PDT
-01:00 PM PDT
- Know exactly what to study, every day - Built by the GMAT Club community - 100% free, no sign-up needed - Aug 18
08:30 AM PDT
-09:30 AM PDT
Strong applicants do not always write strong MBA essays. In this session, we break down 5 common MBA essay mistakes that can quietly weaken an otherwise competitive application. These are not beginner mistakes .... - Aug 18
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Is GMAT Quant really a math test? Many test takers approach GMAT Quant with one of two beliefs: either “I’m not a math person, so I’ll struggle,” or “I’m good at math, so Quant should be easy.” But the GMAT often surprises both groups. - Aug 18
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
In this episode of the GMAT Ninja Podcast, Charles and Brian Prestia bring six of the wildest GMAT improvement stories they’ve seen across decades of teaching. 
Aug 2210:00 AM EDT
-01:00 PM EDT
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Saturdays August 22, 2026 - Nov. 14, 2026, 10:00am-1:00pm EST
30 Jul 2026, 22:09
Kudos
Bookmarks
How I used a two-week retake window to push a 685 up to a 715, by fixing one section instead of all three.
I scored a 715, with a V86, Q87, and DI84.
Why I went back in:
I had scored a 685 about three weeks earlier and honestly I was happy with it, but there was one section where I felt I had left points on the table, and I wanted to push for a 705 or 715 before applications. I gave myself a two-week timeline so I would still have enough time for applications. The thing I kept reminding myself is that with a window that short you cannot fix everything, so you have to be honest about the one section where the points are actually sitting.
Verbal:
My verbal was already strong, but on the 685 breakdown my reading comprehension was around the 95th percentile while my critical reasoning was sitting somewhere in the 70th, so CR was clearly where the room was. I narrowed it down to the question types I was weak in, which were strengthen and weaken questions, and bold face. For bold face the fix was going back to the process skills in the e-GMAT course and actually writing down the function of each bold sentence, what bold face one and bold face two are doing in the larger argument, before letting myself look at the choices. If you read the choices first you talk yourself into one that sounds right but has one wrong word in it. Once I had a clear idea of what each line was doing, I could go in and eliminate the ones that were not accurate. The resource that made this work was Scholaranium in the e-GMAT course. The hard-level questions there are genuinely hard, hard enough that on the real exam some questions actually felt easy by comparison. I used cementing quizzes, smaller practice exams, and guided practice where I could see the worked solution after each question, which is how I learn best, because I see what went wrong on one question and apply it to the next. It takes more time than grinding a large volume, but going through the solution properly is what teaches you. My CR moved from the 78th percentile to the 90th, and verbal came out at a V86.
Quant:
Quant was the section I decided to really go after, because it was where I could see the biggest opportunity. On the 685 I was at a Q83, around the 80th percentile, and my hard-level accuracy was not consistent across all the topics. If you want to get above a Q84 or Q85, that consistency at the hard level across every topic is exactly what you need, and that is where I still had gaps. I zeroed in on algebra and word problems, because those were the blocks that needed more cementing. I went through multiple hard cementing quizzes for both blocks and used Neuron in the e-GMAT course for untimed practice alongside that. Something I did not expect was that working through the data sufficiency course for Data Insights fed back into quant, because a lot of the word-problem concepts showed up there too, so that preparation helped my word problems in quant as well. On top of that I leaned on my checklist. After every mock, cementing quiz, and sectional you have an error log of what you got wrong, and the checklist was my way of taking the mistakes I kept repeating and consolidating them into one quick bullet I could review before the next mock. Things like reviewing the constraints in the prompt and making sure I had captured positive, negative, or integer before choosing an answer. Those are the misses that cost you points, because getting a medium-level question wrong on a missed constraint drives the algorithm down. That focus took me from Q83 to Q87, from the 80th percentile to the 94th.
Data Insights:
My Data Insights was already at the 97th percentile, so the goal was simply not to let it slip while I put my energy into quant and verbal, and it was the section I spent the least time on by design. I did put a little more time into data sufficiency, since that was the one part of DI I felt was a relative weakness. Mostly, maintenance looked like five or six focused MSR and data sufficiency questions every few days, never large sets, then a full mock in the e-GMAT course to check the concepts were still cemented. When I missed something it was almost never a concept gap, it was a process skill I had let slip, and my error log kept me honest about that.
Changing my section order:
The one structural change I made was my section order. For the 685, and the months before, I ran verbal, then Data Insights, then quant. Verbal had to stay first because it needs the most focus. But a couple of days before the exam I switched quant and DI, so it was verbal, then quant, then Data Insights. The quant questions I was missing were mostly missed constraints, the silly fatigue-induced errors where you go too fast and miss a keyword, and doing quant earlier while I was less fatigued cut those out. Quant is different from verbal in that even if you have seen a quant question before, you could still solve it from scratch, whereas a verbal passage is familiar the second time you see it. I tested the new order across three mocks, including a brand new one, felt more confident going into quant each time, and kept it for the exam.
Mock Exams:
By this point I had used most of the mocks, even the SigmaX ones, so I was revisiting them, and a lot of people assume you cannot get much out of a repeated mock. I did not find that. The exam is very long, so going through the whole process again is useful, and for quant and DI a repeated question is basically a brand new process unless you have seen it many times. My scores on the revisited mocks were a little inflated and some still landed below my real score, but I did not let that get in my head, because the number I cared about was not the overall mock score. It was my L20 hard accuracy, the metric my mentor Kavya and I tracked the whole way, the accuracy on the last twenty hard questions broken down subtopic by subtopic rather than lumped together. At that detail you know your algebra accuracy is real and not luck. For a Q87 you want around 80 to 85 percent hard accuracy across the subtopics, and once I saw I was consistently there, I had the confidence to walk in regardless of what a repeated mock said.
Deciding whether to retake?
If you are sitting at a 685 deciding how to spend a two-week retake window, the one thing I would tell you is to focus on the single section where you can improve the most, rather than spreading yourself across all three. Two weeks is short and there is only so much you can do, so the time should go to the section where you can move your accuracy the most. For me that was quant, because above a V84 verbal gets incrementally harder to move by even a point, whereas quant, when the issue is process skills or a couple of weak topics or missed constraints, is a much easier pull. That focus, and the e-GMAT course analytics showing me exactly where quant was leaking, is what turned a 685 into a 715.
I scored a 715, with a V86, Q87, and DI84.
Why I went back in:
I had scored a 685 about three weeks earlier and honestly I was happy with it, but there was one section where I felt I had left points on the table, and I wanted to push for a 705 or 715 before applications. I gave myself a two-week timeline so I would still have enough time for applications. The thing I kept reminding myself is that with a window that short you cannot fix everything, so you have to be honest about the one section where the points are actually sitting.
Verbal:
My verbal was already strong, but on the 685 breakdown my reading comprehension was around the 95th percentile while my critical reasoning was sitting somewhere in the 70th, so CR was clearly where the room was. I narrowed it down to the question types I was weak in, which were strengthen and weaken questions, and bold face. For bold face the fix was going back to the process skills in the e-GMAT course and actually writing down the function of each bold sentence, what bold face one and bold face two are doing in the larger argument, before letting myself look at the choices. If you read the choices first you talk yourself into one that sounds right but has one wrong word in it. Once I had a clear idea of what each line was doing, I could go in and eliminate the ones that were not accurate. The resource that made this work was Scholaranium in the e-GMAT course. The hard-level questions there are genuinely hard, hard enough that on the real exam some questions actually felt easy by comparison. I used cementing quizzes, smaller practice exams, and guided practice where I could see the worked solution after each question, which is how I learn best, because I see what went wrong on one question and apply it to the next. It takes more time than grinding a large volume, but going through the solution properly is what teaches you. My CR moved from the 78th percentile to the 90th, and verbal came out at a V86.
Quant:
Quant was the section I decided to really go after, because it was where I could see the biggest opportunity. On the 685 I was at a Q83, around the 80th percentile, and my hard-level accuracy was not consistent across all the topics. If you want to get above a Q84 or Q85, that consistency at the hard level across every topic is exactly what you need, and that is where I still had gaps. I zeroed in on algebra and word problems, because those were the blocks that needed more cementing. I went through multiple hard cementing quizzes for both blocks and used Neuron in the e-GMAT course for untimed practice alongside that. Something I did not expect was that working through the data sufficiency course for Data Insights fed back into quant, because a lot of the word-problem concepts showed up there too, so that preparation helped my word problems in quant as well. On top of that I leaned on my checklist. After every mock, cementing quiz, and sectional you have an error log of what you got wrong, and the checklist was my way of taking the mistakes I kept repeating and consolidating them into one quick bullet I could review before the next mock. Things like reviewing the constraints in the prompt and making sure I had captured positive, negative, or integer before choosing an answer. Those are the misses that cost you points, because getting a medium-level question wrong on a missed constraint drives the algorithm down. That focus took me from Q83 to Q87, from the 80th percentile to the 94th.
Data Insights:
My Data Insights was already at the 97th percentile, so the goal was simply not to let it slip while I put my energy into quant and verbal, and it was the section I spent the least time on by design. I did put a little more time into data sufficiency, since that was the one part of DI I felt was a relative weakness. Mostly, maintenance looked like five or six focused MSR and data sufficiency questions every few days, never large sets, then a full mock in the e-GMAT course to check the concepts were still cemented. When I missed something it was almost never a concept gap, it was a process skill I had let slip, and my error log kept me honest about that.
Changing my section order:
The one structural change I made was my section order. For the 685, and the months before, I ran verbal, then Data Insights, then quant. Verbal had to stay first because it needs the most focus. But a couple of days before the exam I switched quant and DI, so it was verbal, then quant, then Data Insights. The quant questions I was missing were mostly missed constraints, the silly fatigue-induced errors where you go too fast and miss a keyword, and doing quant earlier while I was less fatigued cut those out. Quant is different from verbal in that even if you have seen a quant question before, you could still solve it from scratch, whereas a verbal passage is familiar the second time you see it. I tested the new order across three mocks, including a brand new one, felt more confident going into quant each time, and kept it for the exam.
Mock Exams:
By this point I had used most of the mocks, even the SigmaX ones, so I was revisiting them, and a lot of people assume you cannot get much out of a repeated mock. I did not find that. The exam is very long, so going through the whole process again is useful, and for quant and DI a repeated question is basically a brand new process unless you have seen it many times. My scores on the revisited mocks were a little inflated and some still landed below my real score, but I did not let that get in my head, because the number I cared about was not the overall mock score. It was my L20 hard accuracy, the metric my mentor Kavya and I tracked the whole way, the accuracy on the last twenty hard questions broken down subtopic by subtopic rather than lumped together. At that detail you know your algebra accuracy is real and not luck. For a Q87 you want around 80 to 85 percent hard accuracy across the subtopics, and once I saw I was consistently there, I had the confidence to walk in regardless of what a repeated mock said.
Deciding whether to retake?
If you are sitting at a 685 deciding how to spend a two-week retake window, the one thing I would tell you is to focus on the single section where you can improve the most, rather than spreading yourself across all three. Two weeks is short and there is only so much you can do, so the time should go to the section where you can move your accuracy the most. For me that was quant, because above a V84 verbal gets incrementally harder to move by even a point, whereas quant, when the issue is process skills or a couple of weak topics or missed constraints, is a much easier pull. That focus, and the e-GMAT course analytics showing me exactly where quant was leaking, is what turned a 685 into a 715.
31 Jul 2026, 05:46
Kudos
Bookmarks
Great work getting a 715! Best of luck to you as you dive into applications.
31 Jul 2026, 09:53
Kudos
Bookmarks
congrats for score.. all the best with applications...
