Quote:
Your
error log must be ongoing and continuous. The
MGMAT error log helps you identify weak subsections. You must take this to figure out WHY you getting certain topics incorrect (weak in SC, weak in area equations, weak with geo, etc.). Your verbal score at a 38 is around that 80 percentile mark and enough for break a 700. You need to get your quant score to a 48 or so to be 80 percentile in both sections.
The MGAMT
error log will get you part way there. You need to analyze the data and figure out the WHY aspect of this. My own personal experience: On my first GMAT attempt, I would solve SC questions in my head. Little did I recognize that my thoughts were grammatically incorrect. Once I realized this (through an analysis of my own personal
error log and the
MGMAT error log), I set a goal to force myself to "think" in more grammatically correct terms. This helped me inch my verbal score from a 36 to a 38.
Thanks for the help. I used two tools in my
MGMAT student center:
- Analysis on my two most recent practice tests
-
OG Archer stat tracker - tracks stats on my
OG problems
I found the following
QUANT:
-
PROBLEM SOLVING OVERALL: I have no issues with the 300 to 600 level questions - The 600 to 800 level questions I have a low success rate
-
DATA SUFFICIENCY OVERALL: I have no issues at the 300 to 500 level questions - The 500 to 800 level questions I am pretty spotty.
-
WEAK AREAS: Probability & Combinatorics, Algebraic Translations, Basic Equations, Equations with Exponents, Functions, Circles & Cylinders, Odds & Evens, Exponents & Roots, Fractions, Decimals, and Percents
VERBAL:
-
RC: My worst area. Miss questions at all levels 300 to 800. I am weak across the board on all RC ? types: Inference, Detail, Main Idea, Structure
-
CR: Need to focus on 600 to 800 Level questions. Weak at strengthen & weaken, explain a situation, and mimic the argument
-
SC: Solid at the 300 to 700 Level. Need to focus on 700 to 800 Level. Weak performance on modifiers, concision, verbs, and comparisons
Now that I have some focus areas though, I'm not sure where to direct my attention regarding these areas. I don't want to kill time unnecessarily by working problems without knowing material, but I also don't want to cover redundant material in strategy guides. This is where I am confused...If I should just re work the problems I worked in the past from the 12th ed. and review them thoroughly. Last time I was working with 4 months. This time I have about 2.
Thanks for the help again!