ipsamolestiae
https://gmatclub.com/forum/for-profit-colleges-serve-far-fewer-students-than-either-public-or-pri-85314.html (is there a cause and effect being established here? The Cause:
Enrolling a greater proportion of financially disadvantaged students.
The Effect:
For-profit colleges drawing a disproportionate share of financial aid.?
Here we have two groups profit colleges and non-profit college (public or private) and given profit college have fewer student than non-profit college, additionally profit college gets by whatever means "disproportionate share of federal and state financial aid for their students", based upon this the author concludes " for-profit colleges enroll a greater proportion of financially disadvantaged students than do non-profit colleges"
The gap here is that "these students (financially disadvantaged) should be getting the financial aid which the profit college draw"
The option choices state
A: Public non-profit colleges and private non-profit colleges enroll a similar proportion of financially disadvantaged students "this goes against the fact about the two college group(wrong)"
B: For-profit colleges do not engage in fraudulent practices in helping their students obtain unneeded federal and state financial aid (this is what the logical gap between conclusion and the premise suggest, this has to be true for conclusion to hold true)
C: This option sets out a nice trap in terms of no. ("we cannot assume that the no. is high all we know that the profit group has fewer students")
D: Quality is not the point
E: default on repayment, "This is not discussed"