Last visit was: 27 Apr 2026, 07:36 It is currently 27 Apr 2026, 07:36
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Nihit
Joined: 02 Dec 2007
Last visit: 16 Sep 2017
Posts: 258
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Posts: 258
Kudos: 2,312
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Twoone
Joined: 02 Sep 2008
Last visit: 25 Oct 2008
Posts: 17
Posts: 17
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
scthakur
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Last visit: 30 Jul 2009
Posts: 608
Own Kudos:
Posts: 608
Kudos: 453
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
bigtreezl
Joined: 23 May 2008
Last visit: 30 Jul 2009
Posts: 364
Own Kudos:
Posts: 364
Kudos: 191
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
y>= 0

1) l x-3 l >= y
x-3 is equal or greater than 0, x could be anything from 3 up
insuff

2) l x-3 l <= -y
so - l x-3 l >= y

x has to be 0 since y>=0
suff

i go with B
User avatar
vishalgc
Joined: 09 Oct 2008
Last visit: 02 Nov 2008
Posts: 48
Own Kudos:
Posts: 48
Kudos: 86
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IMO B:

2) l x-3 l <= -y
so - l x-3 l >= y => -ve >= +ve ..this is possible only when y = 0 so |x-3| =0 and x =3..

What is OA...its good one
User avatar
amitdgr
Joined: 30 Jun 2008
Last visit: 21 May 2013
Posts: 534
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 534
Kudos: 3,214
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
bigtreezl
y>= 0

1) l x-3 l >= y
x-3 is equal or greater than 0, x could be anything from 3 up
insuff

2) l x-3 l <= -y
so - l x-3 l >= y

x has to be 0 since y>=0
suff

i go with B

x cant be zero.
if x is zero then -3 >= 0 which is not possible.
User avatar
spriya
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Last visit: 18 Nov 2010
Posts: 615
Own Kudos:
Posts: 615
Kudos: 3,093
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IMO B
given : y>=0
Question x=?

1)|x-3|>=y
2)|x-3|<=-y

considr 1) when y>=0 |x-3| is always +ve hence >=y

for all x ,hence INSUFFI

2) |x-3|is postive hence <=-y is only vali for y=0

hence x-3=0 or -x+3=0 =>x=3 only unique soln of x => SUFFi

IMO B
Good question
User avatar
domleon
Joined: 14 Jun 2007
Last visit: 22 May 2009
Posts: 77
Own Kudos:
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 77
Kudos: 88
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
guys,

can someone tell me why 2) |x-3|is postive hence <=-y is only vali for y=0 ??

what´s the reason for Y being 0??

thanks
User avatar
amitdgr
Joined: 30 Jun 2008
Last visit: 21 May 2013
Posts: 534
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 534
Kudos: 3,214
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
domleon
guys,

can someone tell me why 2) |x-3|is postive hence <=-y is only vali for y=0 ??

what´s the reason for Y being 0??

thanks

mod of |any variable| is always positive.

Now if given |x-3| <= -(y) ---- where y is always 0 or positive

method 1 )

we know |x-3| cant be negative. and we know y cant be negative either to make -(y) positive.

The only possibility the above equation will hold true is y=0.

method 2)

we know |anything| is always >=0.

what if -(y) is negative ---- The equation does not hold good .. a positive (|x-3|) cannot be less than negative
what if -(y) is positive ----- This cant be true, for -(y) to be positive y has to be negative, but we have been given y>=0
what if -(y) is zero ---- Yes !! This is possible. |something| can be zero.
User avatar
domleon
Joined: 14 Jun 2007
Last visit: 22 May 2009
Posts: 77
Own Kudos:
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 77
Kudos: 88
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
thanks amitdgr!!

i really aprpeciate the that you´ve take you the time to type the comprehensive explaintion into the forum!

cheers
User avatar
JohnLewis1980
Joined: 21 Apr 2008
Last visit: 04 Nov 2010
Posts: 285
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 13
Concentration: Industrial Sector
Schools:Kellogg, MIT, Michigan, Berkeley, Marshall, Mellon
Posts: 285
Kudos: 104
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi guys,

IMO: B

1 |x-3|>=3 for me, this statement does not help to limit the range of x (the absolute value function is always >=0, like y). Therefore, becasue we don't know y, x can be any integer. Not suff.

2 for me it's easier to rewrite the eq as -|x-3|>=y. Because it's given that y>=0, the only possible value for x that satisfies the eq is x=3

OA?

Cheers
User avatar
yezz
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 05 Jul 2006
Last visit: 26 Apr 2022
Posts: 830
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 49
Posts: 830
Kudos: 1,688
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
amitdgr
domleon
guys,

can someone tell me why 2) |x-3|is postive hence <=-y is only vali for y=0 ??

what´s the reason for Y being 0??

thanks

mod of |any variable| is always positive.

Now if given |x-3| <= -(y) ---- where y is always 0 or positive

method 1 )

we know |x-3| cant be negative. and we know y cant be negative either to make -(y) positive.

The only possibility the above equation will hold true is y=0.

method 2)

we know |anything| is always >=0.

what if -(y) is negative ---- The equation does not hold good .. a positive (|x-3|) cannot be less than negative
what if -(y) is positive ----- This cant be true, for -(y) to be positive y has to be negative, but we have been given y>=0
what if -(y) is zero ---- Yes !! This is possible. |something| can be zero.

Text book answer +2 for u :lol:
User avatar
rampuria
Joined: 04 Sep 2008
Last visit: 06 May 2019
Posts: 147
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 56
Location: Kolkata
Concentration: Strategic Management
Schools:La Martiniere for Boys
Posts: 147
Kudos: 312
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Please consider my approach below. Where have i gone wrong?

y =< -|x-3|

since 0 =< y, 0 must also be =< -|x-3|

i.e. |x-3| =< 0

which gives us the solution x>= 3 and x =< 3

Hence not solvable.

Why is my answer not correct. Please can someone help me.
User avatar
madsun
Joined: 15 Apr 2008
Last visit: 03 Jul 2009
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
Posts: 15
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IMO B.

From (1) -> x-3<= -y or x-3>=y not suf.

From (2) -> y<= x-3<=-y
But y>=0 so y must be 0 -> x-3=0 -> x=3 suf.

B it is.
User avatar
klb15
Joined: 21 May 2008
Last visit: 15 Jun 2012
Posts: 64
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 64
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Since y >= 0,
(1) Many values of X possible for equation to hold => Insuff
(2) Since |x-3| >= 0, for equation to hold, y must be 0. Hence unique value for X => Suff.

Ans is B.



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Data Sufficiency (DS) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
Math Expert
109928 posts
GMAT Tutor
1922 posts