Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
\((125.4 - \frac{12}{5}) = 124.4 - 2.4 = 122\) . 34% of 122 is a little more than \(\frac{122}{3} = 41\) . Among the listed choices, C is the closest.
Am I mistaken or did it change from 125.4 to 124.4 incorrectly? I think the answer is the same but there might be something wrong with the explanation.
1 Jack is painting twice as fast as Tom. 2 If Tom painted twice as fast as he actually does, the brothers would finish the work in 3 hours Explanation: Statement (1) by itself is sufficient. S1 reduces to equation 1/J + 1/(2J) = 1/4, where J denotes the time it takes Jack to paint the wall alone. From this equation J=6 Statement (2) by itself is sufficient. S2 reduces to equation: 1/J + 2*(1/4 – 1/J) = 1/3 ; J=6 **** When you say Jack painted twice as fast as Tom it means - Toms time is double or rate is 1/2 - explanation for 1 is fine. When you move on to 2: If Tom painted twice as fast as he actually did - maintaining the same symbology as in statement 1, statement 2 should be 1/J + 1/2(1/4-1/J) = 1/3. (With this equation you dont get a unique solution using statements 1 and 2 individually). I understand 1/J and (1/4-1/J )are rates and twice as fast means work is done in half the time or at double the rate. It would have been nice if the problem statement/solution were consistent !
Problem statement seems open ended. A 5 meter long wire is cut into two pieces. If the longer piece is then used to form a perimeter of a square, what is the probability that the area of the square will be more than 1 if the original wire was cut at an arbitrary point?
I agree with the explanation given in the solution, but there can be infinite points in the first or the last 1 meter. I mean you can cut it at 0.1,0.11,0.2....similarly on the other side you can cut it at 4.1,4.11,4.12,4.13 etc. If I were the problem-setter I would put in a rider/statement that in someway restricts the number of favorable outcomes.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
Archived GMAT Club Tests question - no more replies possible.