Last visit was: 11 Dec 2024, 07:55 It is currently 11 Dec 2024, 07:55
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
ChinusGomes
Joined: 17 Oct 2019
Last visit: 21 Oct 2019
Posts: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatRichC
User avatar
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Last visit: 31 Dec 2023
Posts: 21,807
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 450
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 21,807
Kudos: 12,053
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ccooley
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 04 Dec 2015
Last visit: 06 Jun 2020
Posts: 932
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 115
GMAT 1: 790 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 790 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 932
Kudos: 1,582
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ChinusGomes
Does anyone have a strong structure for how to approach DS problems? In terms of minimum data to solve the problem, and not wasting the time to try and solve it with I and then II and then combined? I'm afraid of wasting time getting actual answers to DS problems, not simply answering the 'sufficiency' question.

Two Three examples:

First Example:
Is sqrt((x-3)2 ) = 3-x?
Given:

x≠3

-x|x| > 0

What is the smartest way to approach the problem? After getting it wrong on a practice test, I can see why the answer is what it is; but not how to come to that conclusion in a time-efficient manner.

Second Example:
In the x-y plane, does y=3x+2 contain (r,s)?
Given:

(3r+2-s)(4r+9-s)=0(4r-6-s)(3r+2-s)=0

Here, I'm at a bit of a loss - is the right approach to plug it into I, and recognize either 3r+2-s could be 0, or 4r+9-s could be? And a similar conclusion for II, but 4r+9-s and 4r-6+s cannot both be zero for a given (r,s)? Basically, do I have to accept this one is going to take longer than the target time?

This article walks through solving a DS problem: https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/blog ... ss-part-1/

A more detailed overview is also at the beginning of each of the MPrep Quant Strategy Guides.

I'll give a very quick outline here, and run through your second problem:

1. Understand the question. This might mean simplifying the math, translating the question into plain English, etc.

In the x-y plane, does y=3x+2 contain (r,s)?

You can tell that a line contains a point, if you can plug the coordinates of the point into the equation of the line, and get a correct result. So, what this is really asking is the following:

Does s = 3r + 2?

Also, note that this is a yes/no question. To answer it, you don't need to know the exact values of s and r. You only need to know whether s = 3r + 2 or not.

2. Pick a statement and understand it.

Statement 1: (3r+2-s)(4r+9-s)=0

This looks like a product of two expressions. I know that if the product of two expressions equals 0, then one or both of those expressions has to equal 0. So, what this is really telling me, is:

Either 3r + 2 - s = 0, OR 4r + 9 - s = 0, or both.

Simplify the math a bit:

Either s = 3r + 2, or s = 4r + 9.

3. Figure out whether that statement gives you enough info to answer the question. Eliminate wrong answers.

One possibility is that s = 3r + 2; in that case, the answer to the question would be 'yes'. But, there's another possibility, that s = 4r + 9. In that case, I don't know whether or not s = 3r + 2, so I couldn't answer the question. Since I'm not sure that I can answer the question, it's insufficient. So, I eliminate A and D (because 1 is insufficient.)

4. Repeat with the other statement:

(4r-6-s)(3r+2-s)=0

Either s = 4r + 6, or s = 3r + 2

But, I don't know which. So, insufficient as well. Eliminate B.

5. If necessary, put the two statements together.

I now know two things. First, I know that s equals either 3r + 2, or 4r + 9. Second, I know that s equals either 3r + 2, or 4r + 6.

The only possibility that matches both of these is that s equals 3r + 2. If s didn't equal 3r + 2, then it would have to equal 4r + 9 (to make the first statement true), but it would also have to equal 4r + 6 (to make the second statement true.) Since those can't both be true, that's impossible. So, the only possibility, given that both statements have to be true at the same time, is that s = 3r + 2. Since you know that, you know the answer to the question is 'yes', so the statements together are sufficient and the answer is C.
Moderator:
Math Expert
97806 posts