Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 15:07 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 15:07

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 22 Apr 2004
Posts: 108
Own Kudos [?]: 1313 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Nov 2004
Posts: 263
Own Kudos [?]: 83 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Chicago
Send PM
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 29 Sep 2005
Posts: 16
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 22 Jun 2005
Posts: 166
Own Kudos [?]: 54 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: London
Send PM
Re: government economists [#permalink]
I'd go with A on this one.
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 03 Aug 2005
Posts: 60
Own Kudos [?]: 8 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: government economists [#permalink]
I pick E.
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 14 Sep 2005
Posts: 525
Own Kudos [?]: 1212 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: South Korea
Send PM
Re: government economists [#permalink]
I vote for (A).

We don't have to assuem (E) since some government economists are already ignoring the outside effects (such as international trades).

If we do not assume (A), to say, if a national economy can prosper without examining all the significant influences on it, we can also say that we don't have to look beyond the national borders.
User avatar
SVP
SVP
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 2004
Own Kudos [?]: 1899 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Singapore
Send PM
Re: government economists [#permalink]
I'll take A. The passage states that the economists need to review every external factor (look beyong borders) if the economy is to grow.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 21 Sep 2005
Posts: 147
Own Kudos [?]: 6 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: government economists [#permalink]
ok, I now strongly think A is the answer..

But could someone explain why "economics is weakly analogous to the physical sciences" is way off? I mean...if it were "economics is STRONGLY analogous to the physical sciences", could it have possibly been an answer...After all, in the conclusion, the passage does express some kind of an analogy between Physical sciences and economics...what am I missing?
User avatar
SVP
SVP
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 2004
Own Kudos [?]: 1899 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Singapore
Send PM
Re: government economists [#permalink]
mohish wrote:
ok, I now strongly think A is the answer..

But could someone explain why "economics is weakly analogous to the physical sciences" is way off? I mean...if it were "economics is STRONGLY analogous to the physical sciences", could it have possibly been an answer...After all, in the conclusion, the passage does express some kind of an analogy between Physical sciences and economics...what am I missing?


The assumption needs to be an unstated piece of premise that will hold up the conclusion. In this passage, the conclusion is "government economists must look beyond national borders if their nations' economies are to prosper.". If we said the assumption was "economics is weakly analogous to the physical sciences", we could quite prop up the conclusion.

Here's one way of looking at it:
- economics is weakly analogous to the physical sciences
- (therefore) economists must look beyond national borders if their nations' economies are to prosper

Doesn't sound very good and very convincing does it?

Now, if you consider A, and using the same method:
- a national economy cannot prosper unless every significant influence on it has been examined by the nation's government economists
- (therefore) economists must look beyond national borders if their nations' economies are to prosper

Now it looks more complete doesn't it? :wink:
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 132
Own Kudos [?]: 24 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: government economists [#permalink]
Folks,

my take is C

My reasoning :

The Conclusion "government economists must look beyond national borders if their nations' economies are to prosper" is based on the premise that "idealisations" is false.

OA / OE please ?
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 21 Sep 2005
Posts: 147
Own Kudos [?]: 6 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: government economists [#permalink]
ywilfred wrote:
mohish wrote:
ok, I now strongly think A is the answer..

But could someone explain why "economics is weakly analogous to the physical sciences" is way off? I mean...if it were "economics is STRONGLY analogous to the physical sciences", could it have possibly been an answer...After all, in the conclusion, the passage does express some kind of an analogy between Physical sciences and economics...what am I missing?


The assumption needs to be an unstated piece of premise that will hold up the conclusion. In this passage, the conclusion is "government economists must look beyond national borders if their nations' economies are to prosper.". If we said the assumption was "economics is weakly analogous to the physical sciences", we could quite prop up the conclusion.

Here's one way of looking at it:
- economics is weakly analogous to the physical sciences
- (therefore) economists must look beyond national borders if their nations' economies are to prosper

Doesn't sound very good and very convincing does it?

Now, if you consider A, and using the same method:
- a national economy cannot prosper unless every significant influence on it has been examined by the nation's government economists
- (therefore) economists must look beyond national borders if their nations' economies are to prosper

Now it looks more complete doesn't it? :wink:


Thanks ywilfred for your lucid explanation. Really helps...
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 22 Apr 2004
Posts: 108
Own Kudos [?]: 1313 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: government economists [#permalink]
OA is A.



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
GMAT Club Bot
Re: government economists [#permalink]
Moderators:
Retired Moderator
654 posts
Current Student
733 posts
Current Student
278 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne