GMAT Changed on April 16th - Read about the latest changes here

It is currently 25 Apr 2018, 05:41

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and hav

  post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Jul 2010
Posts: 129
Re: Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and hav [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Oct 2010, 08:16
adishail wrote:

Now go back to D. Building still there - > original carpentry is good quality - > it is not the workmanship, but the quality of material. Hence, weakens the claim of high quality of workmanship by the author.



Where does it specify about quality of material? It just says that building is still there because of good work done by workers.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Planning to retake.
Affiliations: Alpha Psi Omega
Joined: 25 Oct 2010
Posts: 86
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 650 Q42 V37
GRE 1: 1310 Q630 V680
GPA: 3.16
Re: Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and hav [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Nov 2010, 02:09
After going back and forth between D and E, I chose E after 1:44. Oops.
_________________

Did I help you? Please give me kudos.

Each moment of time ought to be put to proper use, either in business, in improving the mind, in the innocent and necessary relaxations and entertainments of life, or in the care of the moral and religious part of our nature.

-William Andrus Alcott

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Status: Can't give up
Joined: 20 Dec 2009
Posts: 274
Re: Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and hav [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Nov 2010, 07:15
Was not happy with the answer. I was btw B and D, choose D because of the word "quality"

Only thing I got to say, grumpyoldman, thank you for the amazing explanation. I understand indeed why it is D.
Verbal Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 31 Jan 2010
Posts: 442
WE 1: 4 years Tech
Re: Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and hav [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Dec 2010, 06:42
unplugged wrote:
I think A also weakens the argument

If the carpentry in only the hotels is good then there is a possibility that only a few number of carpenters specialized in hotel carpentry were good(I'm assuming that majority of the carpenters, who were pathetic, in 1930s worked for houses, stores etc - makes sense because there must have been hardly a hand few hotels in that period)

So, the author's point of comparison is illogical - he cannot compare only a handful of carpenters of one era with the ones in some other era and make a conclusion about the carpenters as a whole

Cheers,
Unplugged

The person who is making the staement is only talking about Hotels and the carpentry he observed in hotels that he visited
_________________

My Post Invites Discussions not answers
Try to give back something to the Forum.I want your explanations, right now !
Please let me know your opinion about the Chandigarh Gmat Centrehttp://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-experience-at-chandigarh-india-centre-111830.html

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 15 Nov 2009
Posts: 29
Schools: Kelley
Re: Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and hav [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Dec 2010, 09:30
Survivorship bias - so D.

The good hotels are overrepresented in the pre-1930s pool, becuase the bad ones got demolished. In the post 1930s pool (1930 to 2010), the bad to good ratio is not as skewed - since the recent bad ones are still in the sample.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Status: Preparing again for second attempt....
Joined: 11 Dec 2010
Posts: 21
WE 1: 6 years
Re: Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and hav [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Dec 2010, 03:58
Hi Guys, Thanks for the explanation to every option. I am however not convinced as to how D can be the correct answer. Here is my reasoning....

D - in D, you are comparing hotels that are still standing to hotels that were demolished. It makes sense to me that hotels with good carpentary were least likely to be demolished, so the carpenters who made them must have done a good job. On the other hand, the ones that were demolished lacked this sort of carpentary. Now if the author has not seen the ones that were demolished, how can he comment on the skill and hard work of the carpenters who made such hotels? Agreed....But i think we are missing something in this explanation.

Author compares hotels (that are standing - because he visited them) before and after 1930. He isnt even bothered about the quality of carpentary in the hotels that were demolished. So he is comparing GOOD vs EXCELLENT carpentary that was used in the hotels that are still standing. That makes option D do no good.

Please explain if ive missed something here...........thanks
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: I am Midnight's Child !
Joined: 04 Dec 2009
Posts: 120
WE 1: Software Design and Development
Re: Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and hav [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Dec 2010, 08:01
good one and nice explanation grumpy !
_________________

Argument : If you love long trips, you love the GMAT.
Conclusion : GMAT is long journey.

What does the author assume ?
Assumption : A long journey is a long trip.


GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Jan 2011
Posts: 73
Re: Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and hav [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Apr 2011, 23:06
Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and have noticed that in those built before 1930 the quality of the original carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward. Clearly carpenters working on hotels before 1930 typically worked with more skill, care, and effort than carpenters who have worked on hotels built subsequently.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the guidebook writer’s argument?
A. The quality of original carpentry in hotels is generally far superior to the quality
of original carpentry in other structures, such as houses and stores.
B. Hotels built since 1930 can generally accommodate more guests than those built
before 1930.
C. The materials available to carpenters working before 1930 were not significantly
different in quality from the materials available to carpenters working after 1930.
D. The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less likely that
building is to fall into disuse and be demolished.
E. The average length of apprenticeship for carpenters has declined significantly
since 1930.
1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Feb 2011
Posts: 255
Concentration: General Management, Social Entrepreneurship
Schools: HBS '14 (A)
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V47
Re: Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and hav [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Apr 2011, 23:37
1
This post received
KUDOS
A. is irrelevant- Quality of houses and stores is not being discussed here.

B. While it compares favorably hotels built after 1930, does it praise the carpentary? Is the fact that new hotels can accomodate more people that older ones because of their better carpentary? An assumption we cannot make. A likely trap!

C. Materials were not different- so any difference in carpentary might be attributed to skills- strengthens, or neutral- doesnt weaken definitely

D. Correct option- It is simply saying that if the carpentary is good, it is more likely that the structure will not be demolished or fall out of use, and continue serving as a hotel. But what about probability of mnay of hotels built before 1930, which had bad original carpentary and were demolished or fell into disuse, so that the guidebook author never visited them. In the comparison he makes, therefore, he is comparing only the 'good carpentary' cases of hotels before 1930s with those afte 1930s, and is clearly disregarding many possible examples of bad carpentary before 1930s. Unfair comparison - hence weakening to the argument.

E. Seems to imply that therefore the quality of carpentay skills might be going down- which strengthens rather than weaken the argument
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Jan 2011
Posts: 73
Re: Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and hav [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Apr 2011, 05:13
Thnx for the explaination....

Posted from my mobile device
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Posts: 568
Re: Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and hav [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Apr 2011, 07:46
excellent explanation grumpy , thanks for letting me know that i need to revise the power score CR bible.
_________________

What is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy.

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: ==GMAT Ninja==
Joined: 08 Jan 2011
Posts: 220
Schools: ISB, IIMA ,SP Jain , XLRI
WE 1: Aditya Birla Group (sales)
WE 2: Saint Gobain Group (sales)
Re: Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and hav [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Jun 2011, 03:41
vaivish1723 wrote:
I have visited hotels throughout the country and have noticed that in those built before 1930 the quality of the original carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward. Clearly carpenters working on hotels before 1930 typically worked with more skill, care, and effort than carpenters who have worked on hotels built subsequently.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the guidebook writer’s argument?

A. The quality of original carpentry in hotels is generally far superior to the quality of original carpentry in other structures, such as houses and stores.
B. Hotels built since 1930 can generally accommodate more guests than those built before 1930.
C. The materials available to carpenters working before 1930 were not significantly different in quality from the materials available to carpenters working after 1930.
D. The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less likely that building is to fall into disuse and be demolished.
E. The average length of apprenticeship for carpenters has declined significantly since 1930.


I dont know the answer, Kindly explain along with the right answer


I got it wrong
i was confused by E
however now i have to take it as D after reading the explanation :? :?
_________________

WarLocK
_____________________________________________________________________________
The War is oNNNNNNNNNNNNN for 720+
see my Test exp here http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-test-experience-111610.html
do not hesitate me giving kudos if you like my post. :)

Director
Director
avatar
Status: Prep started for the n-th time
Joined: 29 Aug 2010
Posts: 592
Re: Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and hav [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Jun 2011, 04:05
D it is.

D tells us Writer visited only those before-1930-hotels that had better quality of carpentary. Otherwise those hotels would have not in use as hotels at all. Hence it weakens writer's claim
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: ==GMAT Ninja==
Joined: 08 Jan 2011
Posts: 220
Schools: ISB, IIMA ,SP Jain , XLRI
WE 1: Aditya Birla Group (sales)
WE 2: Saint Gobain Group (sales)
Re: Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and hav [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Jun 2011, 04:09
crick20002002 wrote:
D it is.

D tells us Writer visited only those before-1930-hotels that had better quality of carpentary. Otherwise those hotels would have not in use as hotels at all. Hence it weakens writer's claim


Excellent man
nice and different explanation
kudos to you :) :)
_________________

WarLocK
_____________________________________________________________________________
The War is oNNNNNNNNNNNNN for 720+
see my Test exp here http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-test-experience-111610.html
do not hesitate me giving kudos if you like my post. :)

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 14 Apr 2011
Posts: 16
Re: Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and hav [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jun 2011, 20:21
The essence of the argument is that better quality hotels is a result of working with more skill, care, and effort prior to 1930. So we need to find a case that refutes this claim. Look for the option disproving that all buildings in this era were of good quality.

D. The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less likely that building is to fall into disuse and be demolished.

If this is true, then we can't say that all hotels were quality hotels prior to 1930 because there could be thousands built at this time that were of poor qualilty which fell into disuse and were demolished. So it correctly weakens the argument.
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2011
Posts: 7
Schools: Ohio State University
Re: Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and hav [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Jul 2011, 01:55
for D...if the original carpentry work is better before 1930 than since 1930, then why can't we conclude that the worker before 1930 is better than that after 1930? Even the less quality carpentry could be demolished, we can still get that conclusion since worse carpentry is easier to be demolished...

can anyone help me on this?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Single
Joined: 05 Jun 2011
Posts: 111
Location: Shanghai China
Re: Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and hav [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Aug 2011, 08:02
114. Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and have noticed that in those built before 1930 the quality of the orginal carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward. Clearly carpenters working on hotels before 1930 typically worked with more skill, care, and effort than carpenters who have worked on hotels built subsequently

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the guidebook writer's argument

a) The quality of orginal carpentry in hotels is generally far superior to the quality of original carpentry in other structures, such as houses and stores

b) Hotels built since 1930 can generally accommodate more guests than those built before 1930

c) The materials available to carpenters working before 1930 were not signficantly different in quality from the materials available to carpenters working after 1930

d) The better the quality of orginal carpentry in building, the less likely taht building is to fall into disuse and be demolished

e) The average length of apprenticeship for carpenters has declined significantly since 1930.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Jun 2009
Posts: 419
Location: United States (MA)
Re: Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and hav [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Aug 2011, 14:01
Argument: quality of carpentry in old hotels is better than new ones , hence the old carpenters were more skilled than newer.
Missing link : why the old carpentry has good quality?

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the guidebook writer's argument

a) - out of scope

b) - less use, more intact build. correct

c) - neutral

d) - Neutral

e) - Strengthens the argument.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Single
Joined: 05 Jun 2011
Posts: 111
Location: Shanghai China
Re: Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and hav [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Aug 2011, 22:23
Hey,buddy. the official answer is D not B, I chose B firsthand like you but it is wrong.

Can someone explain this type of question in more detail?


piyatiwari wrote:
Argument: quality of carpentry in old hotels is better than new ones , hence the old carpenters were more skilled than newer.
Missing link : why the old carpentry has good quality?

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the guidebook writer's argument

a) - out of scope

b) - less use, more intact build. correct

c) - neutral

d) - Neutral

e) - Strengthens the argument.
Director
Director
avatar
Status: Prep started for the n-th time
Joined: 29 Aug 2010
Posts: 592
Re: Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and hav [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Aug 2011, 22:40
This problem has been discussed earlier.

http://gmatclub.com/forum/cr-guidebook-writer-47863.html

Crick
Re: Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and hav   [#permalink] 02 Aug 2011, 22:40

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9    Next  [ 167 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and hav

  post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Moderators: GMATNinja, GMATNinjaTwo



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.