Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 06:43 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 06:43
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Rewards
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
   1   2   3 
805+ Level|   Inference|               
User avatar
DmitryFarber
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,020
Own Kudos:
8,563
Given Kudos: 57
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 3,020
Kudos: 8,563
Half of Metroburg's operating budget comes from a payroll tax of 2 per Updated on: 28 Sep 2024, 23:04
Originally posted by DmitryFarber on 28 Sep 2024, 22:54.
Last edited by DmitryFarber on 28 Sep 2024, 23:04, edited 1 time in total.
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dbrunik

I wouldn't recommend judging an older problem by more recent developments--it's not live on the test. But in any case, since the argument talks about people being "employed at" a particular location, we can figure that they are actually going to a physical workplace. Also, since E is just about a change in proportion, we don't have to worry about the number of workers. The answer isn't quantified at all, so any change in number will create a change in proportion.
User avatar
CorporateAsset
User avatar
Joined: 25 Aug 2024
Last visit: 23 Jul 2025
Posts: 48
Own Kudos:
32
Given Kudos: 255
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Strategy
GPA: 4
Products:
My Reviews
Posts: 48
Kudos: 32
Half of Metroburg's operating budget comes from a payroll tax of 2 per 30 Sep 2024, 01:30
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
All math based:

Facts given-
1% people employed in company
contribute to 50% operating budget
by 2% tax on salary

If current total employed in city = 100
city population = 1000
1% employed in firm = 1
contributes to 50% operating budget via 2% salary

if this 1 leaves,

A. not 1% revenue reduction, 50% reduction
B. unemployment rate decreased 100/1000 = 10% to 99/999 =8~9%
C. we don't know
D. similar to A
E. If out of 100 people employed in public = 60, private = 40, now it's 60 : 39, proportion of public increased
User avatar
desertEagle
User avatar
Joined: 14 Jun 2014
Last visit: 03 Aug 2025
Posts: 567
Own Kudos:
344
Given Kudos: 413
Posts: 567
Kudos: 344
Half of Metroburg's operating budget comes from a payroll tax of 2 per 14 Apr 2025, 17:59
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
For option E, What if before the departure, there were zero public employees. Then public sector participation would have been zero. And after the departure of the pvt company, the proportion of public sector employment will still be zero. So, No change.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,783
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,783
Half of Metroburg's operating budget comes from a payroll tax of 2 per 19 Apr 2025, 08:10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
desertEagle
For option E, What if before the departure, there were zero public employees. Then public sector participation would have been zero. And after the departure of the pvt company, the proportion of public sector employment will still be zero. So, No change.
Show more
We attempted to address this concern in this post earlier in the thread.

Also, we're looking for an answer choice that can most properly be concluded, not something that can be 100% proven. Similarly, "will tend to increase... " isn't quite the same as "will definitely increase...".

(E) is a reasonable conclusion based on the information given, and it's certainly the best available option.
User avatar
Addu.23
User avatar
Joined: 04 Jul 2017
Last visit: 18 Jul 2025
Posts: 17
Own Kudos:
5
Given Kudos: 102
Posts: 17
Kudos: 5
Half of Metroburg's operating budget comes from a payroll tax of 2 per 24 Jun 2025, 12:11
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Soo according to ChatGPT, the answer was D (I got the same answer too). Lol I'm so confused. It's a great question no doubt. Not sure what the answer is. GPTs response to your point was this:

You're asking whether this explanation is correct for eliminating Options A and D in the Metroburg question. Let's break it down and assess the logic.
[hr]
🧠 First: Recap the relevant part of the question
We're told:
  • 50% of the city’s operating budget comes from a 2% payroll tax on salaries paid to people working in the city.
  • A large company that employs 1% of all workers in Metroburg is moving outside the city.
  • We must find what can properly be concluded.
[hr]
✅ Your Explanation: Evaluated Point-by-Point
🔹 Claim 1: “We don’t know how much revenue the FS company contributes; salaries may be above or below average.”
Assessment: Partially true — but not the reason why D is wrong.
  • You're absolutely right that the actual dollar amount lost in payroll tax revenue depends on total salary paid, not just headcount.
  • BUT Option D doesn't claim a specific dollar value — it just says "revenue will decline by 1% if no new jobs replace those lost."
  • That statement is based on the given fact that the company employs 1% of the workforce. So if we assume average salaries (which we must unless told otherwise), it's fair to infer a 1% drop in payroll tax revenue.
  • So D is valid as a conclusion using only the information given and a reasonable assumption of proportionality.
🟩 So this reasoning would be valid if Option D referred to specific tax dollars or made assumptions about salary levels — but it doesn’t.
[hr]
🔹 Claim 2: “A and D are essentially saying the same thing, so either both are right or both are wrong.”
Assessment: Not quite.
Let’s look at the actual wording of A vs D:
  • Option A:
    "Unless other employers add a substantial number of jobs in Metroburg, the company's relocation is likely to result in a 1 percent reduction in the revenue for the city's operating budget."
  • Option D:
    "Revenue from the payroll tax will decline by 1 percent if there is no increase in jobs within the city to compensate, fully or partially, for the company's departure."
🔍 Key Differences:
  • A talks about a 1% reduction in the overall operating budget.
    • Payroll tax is only 50% of the budget → so losing 1% of that means only a 0.5% budget hit, not 1%.
    • ❌ So A overstates the impact on the budget — it’s not logically valid.
  • D talks only about a 1% reduction in payroll tax revenue, not the whole budget.
    • Since 1% of employees leave, it’s reasonable to infer 1% drop in that revenue stream.
    • ✅ So D is correct.
🟥 So they are not saying the same thing. A talks about the whole budget, D talks about the payroll tax only.
[hr]
✅ Final Verdict on Your Explanation:
Part of ExplanationVerdictReason
We don’t know the salary levels, so can’t assume the impact❌GMAT lets you assume average unless told otherwise; D uses proportion (not absolute)
A and D are essentially the same❌A overstates (operating budget), D stays within scope (payroll tax)
Therefore both must be wrong❌D is correctly inferred; A is not

[hr]
:lol::dontknow:
Quote:
"Option A is incorrect because it assumes a 1% drop in the city’s operating budget, but only half the budget comes from the payroll tax. So losing 1% of the tax base would cause less than 1% drop overall, making A an overstatement.
Option D, however, refers only to the payroll tax itself and correctly states that if no jobs are added, payroll tax revenue will decline by 1% — which follows directly from the information given about the company employing 1% of the workforce. So D is correct and A is not."
Show more

Kritisood
generis
Half of Metroburg's operating budget comes from a payroll tax of 2 percent on salaries paid to people who work in the city. Recently a financial services company, one of Metroburg's largest private-sector employers, announced that it will be relocating just outside the city. All the company's employees, amounting to 1 percent of all people now employed in Metroburg, will be employed at the new location.

From the information given, which of the following can most properly be concluded?


A) Unless other employers add a substantial number of jobs in Metroburg, the company's relocation is likely to result in a 1 percent reduction in the revenue for the city's operating budget.

B) Although the company's relocation will have a negative effect on the city's tax revenue, the company's departure will not lead to any increase in the unemployment rate among city residents.

C) One of the benefits that the company will realize from its relocation is a reduction in the taxes paid by itself and its employees.

D) Revenue from the payroll tax will decline by 1 percent if there is no increase in jobs within the city to compensate, fully or partially, for the company's departure.

E) The company's relocation will tend to increase the proportion of jobs in Metroburg that are in the public sector, unless it results in a contraction of the public-sector payroll.


CR08540.02

The reason why A and D are incorrect is that we are not told how much revenue is actually contributed by this financial services (FS) private sector giant. The salaries that it pays to its employees could be well above the average of Metroburgs salary or well below as well. In this case, we cannot conclude whether A or D is for sure correct. Also, another reason should come to mind before choosing A or D is that what is so different bw either? both are stating more/less the same thing. Hence, either both will be correct (which isn't poss) or both will be incorrect.

The reason why E is correct and so tricky to spot (i also fell for the trap btw) is that the private sector FS co comprises of 1% of the employees. if they relocate then all things being equal the PROPORTION of the employees in the public sector domain will rise in comparison to before. BUT not if this relocation leads to a decrease in the salaries of the public sector employees.

AHH, subtle but a very good question!!
Show more
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,783
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,783
 [1]
Half of Metroburg's operating budget comes from a payroll tax of 2 per 30 Jun 2025, 08:52
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Addu.23
Soo according to ChatGPT, the answer was D (I got the same answer too). Lol I'm so confused. It's a great question no doubt. Not sure what the answer is.
Show more
My favorite part of ChatGPT's explanation, with the juiciest part highlighted in blue:

Quote:
✅ Final Verdict on Your Explanation:
Part of ExplanationVerdictReason
We don’t know the salary levels, so can’t assume the impact❌GMAT lets you assume average unless told otherwise; D uses proportion (not absolute)
A and D are essentially the same❌A overstates (operating budget), D stays within scope (payroll tax)
Therefore both must be wrong❌D is correctly inferred; A is not

[hr]
:lol::dontknow:
Show more
"GMAT lets you assume average unless told otherwise." Sorry Mr. Robot, but you cannot "assume average salaries". Where did ChatGPT get that idea??!?

And that's exactly why (D) must be eliminated, as explained by other users earlier in the thread. If, say, the average salary at the financial services company is double the average salary everywhere else, revenue will decline by more than 1 percent.
User avatar
GMATQuizMaster
User avatar
Joined: 17 Jun 2025
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 37
Own Kudos:
18
Given Kudos: 3
Status:Prep Company
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 37
Kudos: 18
Half of Metroburg's operating budget comes from a payroll tax of 2 per 28 Oct 2025, 05:50
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Two traps in one question:

Trap 1: Company relocates all employees => no unemployment increase in city
Trap 2: 1% employees leave => 1% revenue drop

Both sound logical. Both are wrong.

Why? Watch the solution:
   1   2   3 
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
miag
188 posts