Last visit was: 24 Jun 2025, 15:12 It is currently 24 Jun 2025, 15:12
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
555-605 Level|   Non-Math Related|                  
User avatar
parkhydel
Joined: 03 Jun 2019
Last visit: 27 Mar 2025
Posts: 216
Own Kudos:
16,934
 [36]
Given Kudos: 60
Posts: 216
Kudos: 16,934
 [36]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
32
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
ChiranjeevSingh
Joined: 22 Oct 2012
Last visit: 24 Jun 2025
Posts: 394
Own Kudos:
2,854
 [12]
Given Kudos: 150
Status:Private GMAT Tutor
Location: India
Concentration: Economics, Finance
Schools: IIMA  (A)
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V85 DI85
GMAT Focus 2: 735 Q90 V85 DI85
GMAT Focus 3: 735 Q88 V87 DI84
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V47
GRE 1: Q170 V168
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: IIMA  (A)
GMAT Focus 3: 735 Q88 V87 DI84
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V47
GRE 1: Q170 V168
Posts: 394
Kudos: 2,854
 [12]
11
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
Apt0810
Joined: 15 Jul 2018
Last visit: 24 Oct 2020
Posts: 337
Own Kudos:
570
 [1]
Given Kudos: 94
Posts: 337
Kudos: 570
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
hassan233
Joined: 28 Dec 2020
Last visit: 16 Feb 2022
Posts: 53
Own Kudos:
54
 [2]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: United States
Posts: 53
Kudos: 54
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Health advocate: The government’s current farm-subsidy system primarily rewards large farms for planting monocultures of corn, soybeans, wheat, and rice. Most of the crops produced in this way go to feed livestock in factory farms, which results in a glut of fatty meats in the marketplace. A large proportion of such crops that are not used to feed livestock are used to make sugary processed foods. These subsidies promote unhealthy diets by making sugary foods and fatty meats artificially cheap. Obviously, it is important for the government to avoid these effects.

The bolded words are what you need. It is saying that the subsidies are bad (and should be changed) because they promote unhealthy diets (so getting rid of these subsidies should better people's diets).
User avatar
krndatta
Joined: 09 Feb 2020
Last visit: 17 Oct 2024
Posts: 383
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 433
Location: India
Posts: 383
Kudos: 43
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
hassan233
Can you explain why "Improve the overall quality of livestock feed" cannot be the recommended action?

Thanks
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 24 Jun 2025
Posts: 15,671
Own Kudos:
45,876
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6,066
GPA: 3.62
Posts: 15,671
Kudos: 45,876
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
krndatta
hassan233
Can you explain why "Improve the overall quality of livestock feed" cannot be the recommended action?

Thanks

Take this question as GMAT CR question, read the statement carefully and keep CR logic in mind. According to the passage livestock feed and sugary processed food are produced from the plantation of monocultures of corn, soybeans, wheat, and rice. Hence livestock feed is one of the two products produced. The government wants one of them to be reduced or eliminated. The pattern of the reasoning tells that the quality of livestock feed can be if any, a result of an action, not the action itself. "Improve the overall quality of livestock feed" is nowhere related to the recommended action.
User avatar
krndatta
Joined: 09 Feb 2020
Last visit: 17 Oct 2024
Posts: 383
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 433
Location: India
Posts: 383
Kudos: 43
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sajjad1994
Hi,
So basically quality of livestock feed is not the concern of the author.
He is interested in artificially cheap diets?
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 24 Jun 2025
Posts: 15,671
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,066
GPA: 3.62
Posts: 15,671
Kudos: 45,876
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
krndatta
Sajjad1994
Hi,
So basically quality of livestock feed is not the concern of the author.
He is interested in artificially cheap diets?

The government's main concern is "sugary processed food".
User avatar
krndatta
Joined: 09 Feb 2020
Last visit: 17 Oct 2024
Posts: 383
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 433
Location: India
Posts: 383
Kudos: 43
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sajjad1994
Alright. The government's concern is sugar processed foods.
The concern of the author is the actions following the subsidies.
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 24 Jun 2025
Posts: 15,671
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,066
GPA: 3.62
Posts: 15,671
Kudos: 45,876
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
krndatta
Sajjad1994
Alright. The government's concern is sugar processed foods.
The concern of the author is the actions following the subsidies.

Health advocate is representative of the government he is saying what government wants. There is only one party involved here that is the government or health advocate whatever you name it.
User avatar
krndatta
Joined: 09 Feb 2020
Last visit: 17 Oct 2024
Posts: 383
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 433
Location: India
Posts: 383
Kudos: 43
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sajjad1994
Alright.
Thanks :)
User avatar
Sneha2021
Joined: 20 Dec 2020
Last visit: 10 Jun 2025
Posts: 319
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 525
Location: India
Posts: 319
Kudos: 35
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja KarishmaB Sajjad1994

A large proportion of such crops that are not used to feed livestock are used to make sugary processed foods. These subsidies promote unhealthy diets by making sugary foods and fatty meats artificially cheap. Obviously, it is important for the government to avoid these effects.

Prevent the manufacture of sugary processed food.- Why we cant select this option under "Recommends"
The passage says that unhealthy diet is promoted by sugary food and to prevent that we need to prevent manfacture of this food. It will help to promote healthy diet.

Please help to reject this option
User avatar
satish_sahoo
Joined: 02 Jul 2023
Last visit: 23 Jun 2025
Posts: 162
Own Kudos:
148
 [2]
Given Kudos: 162
Posts: 162
Kudos: 148
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sneha2021
GMATNinja KarishmaB Sajjad1994

A large proportion of such crops that are not used to feed livestock are used to make sugary processed foods. These subsidies promote unhealthy diets by making sugary foods and fatty meats artificially cheap. Obviously, it is important for the government to avoid these effects.

Prevent the manufacture of sugary processed food.- Why we cant select this option under "Recommends"
The passage says that unhealthy diet is promoted by sugary food and to prevent that we need to prevent manfacture of this food. It will help to promote healthy diet.

Please help to reject this option
Hi Sneha2021,

I'll try to help. Just in case this is still a doubt.

It is a great way to treat these text-heavy TPA questions like any RC passage. If you have seen GMATNinja 's video and how Charles approaches any passage is to get the main idea of it.

Here also you may do the same.

So, the health advocate's major concern was with the govt subsidy which encouraged the farms to produce all these crops leading to fatty meats/ sugary processed items. Which then leads to unhealthy diet consumed by the consumers of the marketplace (basically we people). And at the end health advocate suggests that the govt should avoid these effects i.e. Stop or change or modify the SUBSIDY, which doesn't lead to bad diet.

Coming to rejecting the option of - Prevent the manufacture of sugary processed food.
Advocate does say these are unhealthy diet but is it what he actually recommends? His whole idea was based on this particular subsidy harming the diets.

This is how i approached. Hope this made some sense.
User avatar
MohdZaidKhan
Joined: 23 Jun 2024
Last visit: 28 Nov 2024
Posts: 23
Given Kudos: 8
Location: India
Posts: 23
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ChiranjeevSingh

­Understanding the Passage
Health advocate: The government’s current farm-subsidy system primarily rewards large farms for planting monocultures of corn, soybeans, wheat, and rice.
  • Health Advocate (HA) is the author here.
  • The government has a farm-subsidy program
  • The program primarily rewards LARGE farms for planing certain crops.

Most of the crops produced in this way go to feed livestock in factory farms, which results in a glut of fatty meats in the marketplace.
  • MOST crops produced this way (this way likely means monocultures of the four crops) are used as feed for livestock in factory farms.
  • This results in an abundance of fatty meats in the marketplace.
  • This statement presents a problem with the crops produced with the help of the government’s subsidy program. The problem is the presence of excess fat in the meats of livestock fed on such crops.

A large proportion of such crops that are not used to feed livestock are used to make sugary processed foods.
  • Out of the remaining crops, a large proportion is used to make sugary processed foods.
  • This seems to be another problem related to the crops produced with the help of the government's subsidy program. (I am calling it a problem because I know, from common knowledge, that sugary processed foods are not good for health. Besides, the context so far supports this interpretation. As I read the next statement, I see that the next statement makes this connection clear. Thus, one doesn’t need to have this common knowledge to understand this text.)

These subsidies promote unhealthy diets by making sugary foods and fatty meats artificially cheap.
  • Using the above two statements, HA makes a claim that the subsidies promote unhealthy diets by
    • making sugary foods artificially cheap
    • making fatty meats artificially cheap
  • How do subsidies make these things artificially cheap?
  • By providing subsidies, the government brings down the costs of the producers. Thus, these products become ‘artificially’ cheap. (Against something that is naturally cheap because of being abundant in nature or inexpensive to produce)

Obviously, it is important for the government to avoid these effects.
  • Avoiding these effects is important for the government. Which effects?
  • The last statement talks about the promotion of unhealthy diets because of artificially cheap sugary foods and fatty meats. However, this is one effect, not multiple effects.
  • The other effects could be referring to the second and third statements of the passage.

Overall, this passage by HA says that the government’s farm-subsidy program leads to certain outcomes whose avoidance is important to the government.

Understanding the Question Stem

On the basis of the information above, select Recommends for the option that describes the government action that the health advocate most likely recommends,
  • We’re looking for an option that tells us what government action that HA most likely recommends. (Given our understanding of the passage, one recommendation could be changing the existing farm-subsidy program so that it doesn’t lead to the stated problems)

and select Intended for the option that describes what the health advocate likely hopes will be the result of that action. Make only two selections, one in each column.
  • We’re looking for an option that is hoped to be the likely result of the action
As I evaluate the options, I will first look for the recommended action and then, based on that, will look for the intended result of that action.

Evaluating the Options

A. Improve the overall quality of livestock feed.
  • The existing livestock feed is identified as a problem since it leads to fatty meats in the market and thus negatively impacts people's health.
  • Thus, it makes sense to recommend improving the overall quality of livestock feed.
  • However, improving the quality of livestock can be a GOAL but cannot be an ACTION.
  • Thus, this can be the answer to the second part but not the first part.

B. Improve the overall quality of people's diets.
  • Unhealthy diet is identified as a problem
  • Thus, it makes sense to recommend this option.
  • However, like A, B can be a GOAL but cannot be an ACTION.
  • Between A and B, B is more likely to be the goal since B will include A. In other words, improving the quality of people’s diets will include improving the overall quality of livestock feed since the existing livestock feed leads to fatty meats (low-quality people's diet).
  • Besides, HA uses the quality of livestock feed to discuss its impact on people’s diets. Thus, the quality of people’s diets is the main concern of HA.
  • I’ll keep this option on hold for “Intended Result.”

C. Reduce the overall financial cost of people's diets.
  • This option is incorrect.
  • HA suggests that the existing diet is cheap and unhealthy and suggests a path that may increase the cost of people’s diets.

D. Prevent the manufacture of sugary processed food.
  • This option is incorrect.
  • While the crops produced with the help of the farm subsidy program help manufacture sugary processed food, we’re not told that these crops are the ONLY raw material for such food.
  • Thus, the passage is not about “preventing” the manufacture of sugary processed food. (preventing the manufacture means no manufacturing anymore)

E. Change the farm-subsidy system.
  • This option seems most suitable to be the recommended action.
  • Given the flow of the passage, farm-subsidy leads to two outcomes - fatty meats and sugary processed foods. These things then harm people’s diets.
  • Thus, changing the farm-subsidy program will solve the problems discussed in the passage.
  • Also, this is an ACTION that the government can take.
  • Given our evaluation of the remaining option, we can see that option B fits perfectly as the intended result of option E.
­
Great Explanation Sir .I have a doubt regarding your selection of E for the first part . Your explanation's 3rd point saying that changing the farm subsidy program will solve the problems ..., But change can be negative also ... it may be changed in both the positive way and negative way ... which leads to ambiguity ... So I chose option A for first part and B for second part .. .Please help clear my doubt .Regards...
Moderators:
Math Expert
102292 posts
425 posts