mpobisetty
AndrewN
I remember one tutor submitting that the reason for the interim period between successive attempts at a center was that a new question pool would need to be cycled in
Hi AndrewN, I am reading this thread with lot of interest. Can you kindly explain what you mean by this?
Pardon the delay in my response,
mpobisetty. I was hoping to convey that I recall one tutor having said that a plausible explanation for why a test-taker is prohibited from taking the GMAT™ at a test center twice within 16 days is that that period (15-16 days) is most likely the duration for each cycle of questions to appear on the test. To illustrate, take the following hypothetical scenario:
Question Batch #1 → 16 days
Question Batch #2 → 16 days (32 days total)
Question Batch #3 → 16 days (48 days total)
.
.
.
In this manner, no test-taker would see the same questions as before. Over the course of the year, there would be just under two dozen batches of questions that would have appeared on the test. Now, with the GMAT™ Online, the cycle could be quite different, and the dedicated question pool itself would almost certainly be independent of the one used for the test center exam. Thus, there would be no danger of taking back-to-back exams, one at the test center and the other online, and seeing overlapping questions.
GMAC™ holds the answers, of course, but I was reporting what I had read on the matter in another thread.
AjiteshArun
AndrewN
Wow. I guess the standards are a little relaxed between EA and GMAT™ question pools. Maybe GMAC™ is banking on students entering one type of MBA program or another? I wonder whether such a pattern has continued. (I could see some unscrupulous students running things in reverse in an effort to boost their GMAT™ scores.)
That was my reaction as well ("wow"). I don't know how reliable that (one?) post bb refers to is, but if what that member reported is true, I hope GMAC is aware of and does something about the issue.
I cannot imagine such an oversight would persist, given the level of scrutiny GMAC™ engages in to protect the integrity of its questions. At the same time, I tend to give people the benefit of the doubt until I see proof to the contrary, and my naïveté has been exposed before. Bottom line: I cannot say that I have read anything one way or the other on the matter, apart from the above, so I really should not speculate.
- Andrew