karansingh22
Aviroop- Let me put it this way for you. You can get all the opportunities that you would from HKUST even from UCLA but not vice versa.
talk2vj- HKUST is a great school to break into finance in APAC but coming to APAC with a UCLA MBA will be a different ball game.
HKUST does have a strong presence in Asia but the salaries and profiles offered to HKUST graduates are not at par with what is offered to UCLA, Duke, Chicago, NYU etc.
If I get into Duke, NYU or Chicago- I would not even consider HKUST for these reasons.
karan - good to know. Your take on this matter is quite true. The only challenge for me is that, post MBA (3 months after graduation), it will be quite difficult for me to come back to Asia and find a job as the market is well saturated and priority goes to the H/W/S guys. At least if I am in Asia already, I can find something through networking and hkust's career services. I spoke to UCLA alumni based in Asia and they told me that I have to put in extra effort to secure the Asian internship/job, which in these days is not a cake walk.
The other caveat is the $$. UCLA's expenses are a whopping 150K. The school told me I need to fork out 40K on my own. That is a boatload of money. I don't have that much so it means taking loans in India as well as USA. I will be spending a good 10 years of my life paying off loans, which will be a stiff burden.
In the long run UCLA can pay off more. It is an American degree, but then again, in the long run, the MBA degree pays off less while it is more of my experience, the people I know and what I do that matters.